播放速度与知识类型对不同学习风格学生视频学习效果影响的眼动研究
An Eye Movement Study on the Effects of Playing Speed and Knowledge Type on Video Learning of Students with Different Learning Styles
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2024.146432, PDF,   
作者: 王红丽:济南大学,教育与心理科学学院,山东 济南
关键词: 播放速度知识类型视频学习眼动Playback Speed Knowledge Type Video Learning Eye Movement
摘要: 为了探究播放速度和知识类型对不同学习风格大学生视频学习效果的影响,共找到自愿参与实验的学生64名。采用2 × 2 × 4的混合实验设计,自变量为知识类型(陈述性知识、程序性知识)、播放速度(1.0, 1.5)和学习风格(视觉型、听觉型、写读型、动觉型),因变量为平均注视点持续时间、注视次数与测验成绩。研究结果如下:1) 知识类型在眼动数据及测验成绩上都存在主效应。2) 学习风格在眼动数据的平均注视时间上存在主效应。
Abstract: In order to explore the learning effects of college students with different learning styles on different playback speeds and knowledge types of videos, a total of 64 subjects were recruited. A mixed experimental design of 2 × 2 × 4 was adopted. The independent variables were respectively knowledge types (declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge), playback speed (1.0, 1.5) and learning style (visual, auditory, writing, kinesthetic). The dependent variables are the average fixation duration, the number of fixations and test scores. The results of the research are as follows: 1) Knowledge types have main effects on eye movement data and test scores. 2) The learning style has a main effect on the average fixation time of the eye movement data.
文章引用:王红丽 (2024). 播放速度与知识类型对不同学习风格学生视频学习效果影响的眼动研究. 心理学进展, 14(6), 490-507. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.146432

参考文献

[1] 班子涵(2019). 面向学习风格的微视频学习资源设计研究. 硕士学位论文, 沈阳: 沈阳师范大学.
[2] 刁永锋, 刘春明(2014). 网络视频公开课程学习行为眼动实验研究. 现代教育技术, 24(11), 81-87.
[3] 赖文华(2015). 大学生在网络视频学习过程中的眼动行为研究. 教育技术, (6), 76-79.
[4] 马安然, 王燕青(2016). 教学微视频的播放速度对学习效果的影响. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 391-399.
[5] 王雪, 王志军(2016). 网络教学视频字幕设计的眼动实验研究. 现代教育技术, 26(2), 45-51.
[6] 杨娟, 宋晓玲, 乔兴媚(2017). 自主在线学习环境下学习行为与学习风格偏向性的关联分析研究. 心中国远程教育, (10), 47-54.
[7] 易田(2018). 在线教学视频中弹幕对不同类型知识学习的影响. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[8] 张燕南, 张力(2016). 教学习风格对网络学习的影响: 一项实证研究. 开放教育研究, (3), 160-166.
[9] 庄丽君(2015). MOOC视频的分类和吸引力研究. 当代继续教育, (5), 56-59.
[10] Al-Saud, L. M. S. (2013). Learning Style Preferences of First-Year Dental Students at King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Influence of Gender and GPA. Journal of Dental Education, 77, 1371-1378.[CrossRef
[11] Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architure of Cognition. Harvaed University Press.
[12] Fleming, N. D. (1995). I’m Different; Not Dumb: Modes of Presentation (VARK) in the Tertiary Classroom, In A. Zelmer (Ed.), Research and Development in Higher Education, Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference of the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), HERDSA 18 (pp. 308-313).
[13] Griffiths, R. (1990). Speech Rate and NNS Comprehension: A Preliminary Study in Time-Benefit Analysis. Language Learning, 40, 311-336.[CrossRef
[14] Rieber, L. P. (1989). The Effects of Computer Animated Elaboration Strategies and Practice on Factual and Application Learning in an Elementary Science Lesson. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 431-444.[CrossRef
[15] Schär, S. G., & Zimmermann, P. G. (2007). Investigating Means to Reduce Cognitive Load from Animations. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 64-78.[CrossRef
[16] Song, K., Chakraborty, A., Dawson, M., Dugan, A., Adkins, B., & Doty, C. (2018). Does the Podcast Video Playback Speed Affect Comprehension for Novel Curriculum Delivery? A Randomized Trial. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 19, 101-105.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Thomson, I. (2010). Acquiring Declarative and Procedural Knowledge with the Aid of the ClassPad Calculator. Science and Mathematics Education Centre Curtin University of Technology Western Australia.