重大突发事件冲击下的高耗能行业与金融行业双向风险溢出效应分析
Analysis of Bidirectional Risk Spillover Effects between High-Energy-Consuming Industries and the Financial Industry under the Impact of Major Emergencies
DOI: 10.12677/orf.2024.143350, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 谢婉莹, 汪许健:南京信息工程大学管理工程学院,江苏 南京;赖登凌:中国人民解放军陆军勤务学院采购系,重庆
关键词: 风险溢出效应金融行业重大突发事件高耗能行业Risk Spillovers Effects Financial Industry Major Emergencies High-Energy-Consuming Industries
摘要: 本文基于后金融危机时代至俄乌战争爆发五百天这段时间申万一级行业指数中的高耗能行业部分和申万二级行业指数中的银行业、证券业、保险业和多元金融业指数,通过DCC-GARCH拟合,探究高耗能行业与金融行业间的双向风险溢出效应。研究结果表明:第一,高耗能行业与金融风险间的双向风险溢出效应在各重大突发事件中总体上趋势相近,具有相似的风险敏感性;第二,在重大突发事件中,非银金融业更易成为高耗能行业风险溢出的对象;第三,高耗能行业与金融风险间的双向风险溢出效应在不同重大突发事件中存在一定的差异性。研究高耗能行业与金融行业间的双向风险溢出效应对于我国迎接能源安全挑战,化解全球能源危机的风险冲击有着重要意义。
Abstract: Based on the high-energy-consuming industries in the SHENYIN & WANGUO Primary Industry Index and the banking, securities, insurance and diversified financial indices in the SHENYIN & WANGUO Secondary Industry Index during the period from the post-financial crisis era to the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine War for 500 days, this paper explores the two-way risk spillover effect between the high-energy-consuming industries and the financial industry through DCC-GARCH fitting. The results show that: first, the two-way risk spillover effect between energy-intensive industries and financial risks is generally similar in major emergencies and has similar risk sensitivity. Second, in major emergencies, the non-bank financial industry is more likely to become the target of risk spillovers in high-energy-consuming industries. Third, there are certain differences in the two-way risk spillover effect between energy-intensive industries and financial risks in different major emergencies. It is of great significance to study the two-way risk spillover effect between high-energy-consuming industries and financial industries to meet the challenges of energy security and resolve the risk impact of the global energy crisis.
文章引用:谢婉莹, 汪许健, 赖登凌. 重大突发事件冲击下的高耗能行业与金融行业双向风险溢出效应分析[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2024, 14(3): 1194-1208. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2024.143350

参考文献

[1] 杨子晖, 陈雨恬, 张平淼. 重大突发公共事件下的宏观经济冲击、金融风险传导与治理应对[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(5): 13-35+7.
[2] 谢赤, 莫廷程, 李可隆. 重大突发事件背景下金融行业间极端风险相依和风险溢出研究[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2021, 42(3): 2-10.
[3] 胡春阳, 马亚明, 马金娅. 重大事件冲击下金融市场与实体经济间双向尾部风险溢出效应[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2023, 38(2): 3-19.
[4] 曹志宏. 俄乌冲突对国际能源格局的影响及中国的应对[J]. 商业经济, 2022(9): 93-95+126.
[5] 冯保国. 能源安全中的能源金融问题[J]. 国际石油经济, 2023, 31(5): 1-10.
[6] 徐玉华, 黄意强. 碳市场对高耗能行业的风险传染研究[J]. 工业技术经济, 2023, 42(10): 128-138.
[7] 尹成远, 李雨豪. 中国碳市场与高耗能行业间的风险溢出效应研究[J]. 河北金融, 2023(7): 26-30.
[8] 邓晶, 郑雨洁, 顾雪松, 潘焕学. 中国碳市场与绿色金融市场溢出效应研究[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2023(7): 47-59.
[9] Engle, R. (2002) Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20, 339-350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Adrian, T. and Brunnermeier, M.K. (2011) CoVaR. NBER Working Paper No. 17454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef