基于CiteSpace的国内外STEM教育研究比较分析
Comparative Analysis of STEM Education Research at Home and Abroad Based on CiteSpace
DOI: 10.12677/orf.2024.143359, PDF,   
作者: 樊 祺：南通大学教师教育学院，江苏 南通；陆海华*：南通大学数学与统计学院，江苏 南通
关键词: STEM教育；CiteSpace；计量研究；比较分析；STEM Education； CiteSpace； Metrological Research； Comparative Analysis
摘要: 随着21世纪社会对高素质人才培养的新要求，STEM教育迅速兴起和发展。以CNKI和Web of Science中收录的STEM教育相关的核心期刊为数据来源，基于文献计量学理论，利用CiteSpace软件对发文量、作者与机构、关键词进行分析，探索其研究热点、研究主题和发展趋势。研究发现，第一，发文量呈现先增长后波动的趋势，研究在不断深化和拓宽；第二，各研究作者和机构之间合作度不高；第三，研究热点、主题与国家政策联系密切，但国内外研究侧重点不尽相同；第四，国内外未来将从“计算思维”“设计思维”等思维的养成进行探索。
Abstract: With the new requirements of the 21st century society for the cultivation of high-quality talents, STEM education rises and develops rapidly. With the core journals related to STEM education included in CNKI and Web of Science as data sources, based on the theory of bibliometrics, CiteSpace software was used to analyze the number of publications, authors, institutions and keywords, and explore their research hotspots, research topics and development trends. The findings are as follows: First, the number of published papers shows a trend of first growth and then fluctuation, and the research is constantly deepening and broadening; Second, the degree of cooperation between the authors and institutions is not high; Third, the research hotspots and themes are closely related to national policies, but the research emphases at home and abroad are not the same; Fourth, the future at home and abroad will explore the cultivation of thinking such as “computational thinking” and “design thinking”.
文章引用：樊祺, 陆海华. 基于CiteSpace的国内外STEM教育研究比较分析[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2024, 14(3): 1303-1314. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2024.143359

参考文献

[1] 石倩, 何文涛, 梁晨, 等. 近十年国内外STEM课程研究的比较分析[J]. 比较教育学报, 2023(5): 133-146.
[2] 丁学东. 文献计量学基础[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1992.
[3] 陈超. 美国的世界一流大学战略与启示[J]. 中国高教研究, 2008(11): 48-50.
[4] Bybee, R.W. (2010) Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70, 30-35.
[5] National Research Council (2009) Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. The National Academies Press, Washington.
[6] Holdren, J.P., Marrett, C. and Suresh, S. (2013) Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education 5-Year Strategic Plan. National Science and Technology Council, Committee on STEM Education.
[7] Granovskiy, B. (2018) Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: An Overview. CRS Report R45223, Version 4. Updated. Congressional Research Service.
[8] 吕奕静, 张蓉. 近十年国内外在线学习研究综述——基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J]. 成人教育, 2023, 43(6): 47-58.
[9] 曾宁, 张宝辉, 王群利. 近十年国内外STEM教育研究的对比分析——基于内容分析法[J]. 现代远距离教育, 2018(5): 27-38.
[10] 杜文彬. 国外STEM教育研究的热点主题与特点探析[J]. 电化教育研究, 2018, 39(11): 120-128.
[11] 范文翔, 张一春. STEAM教育: 发展、内涵与可能路径[J]. 现代教育技术, 2018, 28(3): 99-105.
[12] 王卓玉, 谢双雪, 程明. 基于文献计量学的国内外STEAM教育研究比较分析[J]. 现代远距离教育, 2021(2): 81-88.
[13] 余胜泉, 胡翔. STEM教育理念与跨学科整合模式[J]. 开放教育研究, 2015, 21(4): 13-22.
[14] 周东岱, 樊雅琴, 于颖, 等. 基于STEAM教育理念的小学课程体系重构研究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2017, 38(8): 105-110, 128.
[15] 董宏建, 白敏. 中国理工科STEM教育发展探究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2016, 26(7): 12-17.
[16] 孟祥宏, 王晓莉. 基于深度学习的STEM教师教学设计能力培养研究[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2023, 41(12): 86-91.
[17] 杨翊, 赵婷婷. 中国大学生高阶思维能力测试蓝图的构建[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2018, 39(5): 54-62.
[18] 首新, 胡卫平, 刘念. 中小学STEM学习中高层次思维测评模型构建与应用[J]. 电化教育研究, 2020, 41(8): 82-89.
[19] 王素. 《2017年中国STEM教育白皮书》解读[J]. 现代教育, 2017(7): 4-7.
[20] Breiner, J.M., Harkness, S.S., Johnson, C.C. and Koehler, C.M. (2012) What Is STEM? A Discussion about Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 3-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Johnson, C.C. (2013) Conceptualizing Integrated STEM Education. School Science and Mathematics, 113, 367-368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Stout, J.G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M. and McManus, M.A. (2011) STEMing the Tide: Using Ingroup Experts to Inoculate Women’s Self-Concept in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255-270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] McGee, E.O. (2020) Interrogating Structural Racism in STEM Higher Education. Educational Researcher, 49, 633-644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Means, B., Wang, H., Young, V., Peters, V.L. and Lynch, S.J. (2016) STEM‐Focused High Schools as a Strategy for Enhancing Readiness for Postsecondary STEM Programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 709-736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Eagan, M.K., Hurtado, S., Chang, M.J., Garcia, G.A., Herrera, F.A. and Garibay, J.C. (2013) Making a Difference in Science Education. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 683-713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Hiğde, E. and Aktamış, H. (2022) The Effects of STEM Activities on Students’ STEM Career Interests, Motivation, Science Process Skills, Science Achievement and Views. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, Article 101000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] Johnson, C.C., Peters-Burton, E.E., Moores, J., et al. (2005) STEM Road Map: A Framework for Integrated STEM Education. Routledge, New York.
[28] Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., et al. (2014) Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410-8415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Fishman, E.J., Borko, H., Osborne, J., Gomez, F., Rafanelli, S., Reigh, E., et al. (2017) A Practice-Based Professional Development Program to Support Scientific Argumentation from Evidence in the Elementary Classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28, 222-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐