基于语料库的《中国日报》对新能源汽车报道的批评话语分析
Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of New Energy Vehicle Report in the China Daily
摘要: 当前，国家未来可持续发展的关键问题在于能源安全和生态环境的保护。为应对此挑战，许多国家将发展新能源汽车作为实现节能减排目标的战略重点，积极推进技术创新和产业升级。《中国制造2025》正式将新能源汽车纳入国家战略规划，为新能源汽车产业的发展注入了新的活力，提供了广阔的发展契机，进一步推动了技术创新和市场拓展。本文以批评话语分析为视角，选取2021年1月1日至2023年12月31日的《中国日报》新能源汽车报道为研究对象，研究发现：近3年，新能源汽车报道急剧增加，报道主题围绕中国新能源汽车发展，汽车市场，销量，行业现状以及汽车制造商动态等展开。报道中强调我国新能源汽车发展迅猛引领全球，呈现良好势态；国家为新能源汽车行业保驾护航，出台政策补贴帮助产业发展。
Abstract: The pivotal issues for a nation’s sustainable development currently lie in energy security and environmental protection. To address these challenges, many countries have designated the development of new energy vehicles (NEVs) as a strategic priority to achieve energy conservation and emission reduction goals, vigorously promoting technological innovation and industrial upgrading. The “Made in China 2025” initiative has officially integrated NEVs into the national strategic framework, infusing new vitality into the NEV industry, providing extensive development opportunities, and further advancing technological innovation and market expansion. This paper adopts a critical discourse analysis perspective, selecting NEV reports from the China Daily from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, as the research corpus. The study reveals that in the past three years, there has been a significant surge in NEV coverage, with themes focusing on the development of NEVs in China, the automotive market, sales figures, industry status, and the dynamics of car manufacturers. The reports highlight China’s rapid progress in the NEV sector, leading globally and demonstrating a positive trajectory; the state supports the NEV industry with protective policies and subsidies to facilitate its growth.
文章引用：罗可意. 基于语料库的《中国日报》对新能源汽车报道的批评话语分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2024, 12(6): 640-650. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2024.126511

参考文献

[1] Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) Critical Discourse Analysis. In: van Dijk, T., Ed., Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Sage Publications, London, 2, 258-284.
[2] Baker, P. and McEnery, T. (2005) A Corpus-Based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts. Journal of Language and Politics, 4, 197-226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Gales, T. (2009) “Diversity” as Enacted in US Immigration Politics and Law: A Corpus-Based Approach. Discourse & Society, 20, 223-240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] O’Regan, V. and Riordan, E. (2018) Comparing the Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Migrants in the Irish and UK Press: A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 17, 744-768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Efe, İ. (2018) A Corpus-Driven Analysis of Representations of Syrian Asylum Seekers in the Turkish Press 2011-2016. Discourse & Communication, 13, 48-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Salama, A.H.Y. (2011) Ideological Collocation and the Recontexualization of Wahhabi-Saudi Islam Post-9/11: A Synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 22, 315-342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Baker, P. (2012) Acceptable Bias? Using Corpus Linguistics Methods with Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9, 247-256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Törnberg, A. and Törnberg, P. (2016) Muslims in Social Media Discourse: Combining Topic Modeling and Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse, Context & Media, 13, 132-142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Griebel, T. and Vollmann, E. (2019) We Can(’t) Do This: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of Migration in Germany. Journal of Language and Politics, 18, 671-697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 钱毓芳, 黄晓琴. 英美主流报刊关于“中国梦”的话语建构研究[J]. 天津外国语大学学报, 2016, 23(4): 15-21+80.
[11] 韩艳方, 陈令君. 及物性系统与中国形象建构——基于语料库的中西方“中国梦”新闻语篇研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018(1): 19-30.
[12] 刘鼎甲. 基于语料库的多方话语历时对比研究——以“中国梦”在美英印的传播与接受为例(2012-2020) [J]. 外语教学, 2022, 43(1): 17-22
[13] 邵斌, 回志明. 西方媒体视野里的“中国梦”——一项基于语料库的批评话语分析[J]. 外语研究, 2014(6): 28-33.
[14] 刘曼. 日本主流报刊对“一带一路”的认知变化研究——基于语料库的批评话语分析[J]. 外语电化教学, 2020(5): 108-113+16.
[15] 辛斌, 时佳. 《人民日报》和《纽约时报》南海仲裁案报道中的中美官方转述言语对比分析[J]. 外语教学, 2018(5): 17-20.
[16] 胡江. 意义单位与批评话语分析——基于语料库的西方媒体涉华军事报道意识形态分析[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2016, 39(5): 73-81.
[17] 杨敏, 侍怡君. 中美贸易战中美方“合法化”话语建构——基于语料库的话语历史分析[J]. 外语研究, 2021(3): 7-13.
[18] 胡元江, 李艳. 媒体话语合法化建构的历史语篇分析——中美主流媒体贸易摩擦报道的对比研究[J]. 外国语文, 2023, 39(4): 92-101.
[19] 刘鼎甲. 新冠肺炎疫情中美国媒体涉华报道的语料库历时分析[J]. 外国语, 2021(6): 52-64.
[20] 王文静. 《中国日报》和《纽约时报》新能源汽车新闻报道中凸显和抹除的生态话语分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2023.
[21] 郑艳萍. 介入系统视角下新能源汽车相关新闻的生态话语分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2021.
[22] 穆军芳, 张青青. 视觉语法视域下新能源汽车广告的生态性建构研究——以2020年奥迪新能源汽车广告为例[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 38(4): 419-428.
[23] 王亦男. 中美新能源汽车企业社会责任报告的生态话语对比分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京第二外国语学院, 2023.
[24] 高洁, 慕媛媛. 语篇-历史分析视角下新能源车企比亚迪身份建构研究[J]. 淮北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 44(5): 120-128.
[25] 钱毓芳. 《纽约时报》关于低碳经济的话语建构[J]. 天津外国语大学学报, 2019, 26(2): 30-41+159.