地势对北京避暑旅游气候舒适度的影响
The Influence of Topography on the Climate Comfortability of Cool Summer Tourism in Beijing
DOI: 10.12677/gser.2024.133057, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 沙 祎, 张爱英*, 白 帆:北京市气象服务中心,北京
关键词: 海拔高度避暑旅游气候舒适度日变化北京Altitude Cool Summer Tourism Climate Comfortability Daily Variation Beijing
摘要: 利用2010~2019年北京6个郊区的52个自动气象观测站的逐小时气象资料,分析了一天中北京郊区避暑旅游舒适度(B)的时间及空间变化特征,并探究了海拔高度对北京郊区适宜开展避暑旅游的时段及区域分布的影响。结果表明:海拔高度对避暑旅游舒适度日变化有明显影响,对最适宜开展避暑旅游的时段及区域有一定判断作用;随着海拔高度升高,北京郊区的B日变化可分为三类,适宜开展避暑旅游的区域海拔高度应高于400米,其中海拔高度高于900米的区域适宜开展避暑旅游时段为09~18时,与公众出游时间重合度更高,且舒适度更高,舒适时段也更长;按行政区划来看,适宜开展避暑旅游的地区主要为延庆、房山、门头沟的西部,以及平谷、密云区的东部。综合来看,海拔高度偏高的区域更适宜开展避暑旅游。
Abstract: Based on the hourly meteorological data from 52 automatic meteorological stations in 6 suburbs of Beijing from 2010 to 2019, the temporal and spatial daily variation characteristics of the climate comfortability of cool summer tourism (B) in Beijing suburbs were analyzed, and the influence of altitude on the suitable time period and regional distribution of cool summer tourism in Beijing suburbs was explored. The results are as follows: Altitude has a significant impact on the daily variation of B, and has a certain role in judging the most suitable time period and area for cool summer tourism. As the altitude increases, the daily variation of B in Beijing suburbs can be divided into three types. The suitable area for cool summer tourism should have an altitude higher than 400 meters, and the area with an altitude higher than 900 meters is suitable for cool summer tourism from 9 to 18 o’clock, which coincides with the public travel time more closely, and has a higher climate comfortability and a longer comfortable period. According to the administrative division, the suitable areas for cool summer tourism are mainly located in western Yanqing, western Fangshan, western Mentougou, eastern Pinggu and eastern Miyun District. In general, the higher the altitude is, the more suitable for cool summer tourism.
文章引用:沙祎, 张爱英, 白帆. 地势对北京避暑旅游气候舒适度的影响[J]. 地理科学研究, 2024, 13(3): 602-609. https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2024.133057

参考文献

[1] 马蔷. 互联网时代旅游气象服务建设探讨[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2021, 11(3): 26-27.
[2] 杨帆. 互联网+时代旅游气象服务建设探讨[J]. 农村实用技术, 2020(9): 171-172.
[3] 宋静, 姜有山, 张银意, 等. 连云港旅游气象指数研究及其预报[J]. 气象科学, 2001, 21(4): 480-485.
[4] 吴章文. 旅游气象学[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2002.
[5] 王远飞, 沈愈. 上海市夏季温湿效应与人体舒适度[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1998(3): 60-66.
[6] 杨成芳. 山东省人体舒适度的REOF分析[J]. 气象科学, 2006, 26(1): 103-109.
[7] 马丽君, 孙根年, 李馥丽, 等. 陕西省旅游气候舒适度评价[J]. 资源科学, 2007, 29(6): 40-44.
[8] 王华芳. 山西省旅游气候舒适度分析与评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 山西大学, 2007.
[9] 罗生洲. 青海省旅游气候指数分析及适宜旅游季节初步划分[J]. 青海科技, 2011, 18(3): 61-64.
[10] 刘少军, 张京红, 吴胜安, 等. 气候变化对海南岛旅游气候舒适度及客流量可能影响的分析[J]. 热带气象学报, 2014, 30(5): 977-982.
[11] 刘峰贵, 李春花, 陈蓉, 等. 避暑型旅游城市的“凉爽”气候条件对比分析——以西宁市为例[J]. 青海师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 31(1): 56-61.
[12] 罗艳, 杨彬, 樊凡, 等. 避暑旅游目的地评价指标构建探索——以安徽省为例[J]. 气象科技进展, 2021, 11(5): 187-189.
[13] 宋丹, 杜正静, 慕建利, 等. 贵州省避暑旅游气象适宜性分析[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2021, 15(2): 112-118.
[14] 吴普, 周志斌, 慕建利. 避暑旅游指数概念模型及评价指标体系构建[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(3): 128-134.
[15] 孙银川, 王素艳, 李浩, 等. 宁夏六盘山区夏季避暑旅游气候舒适度分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2018, 36(6): 1035-1042.
[16] 侯亚红, 息涛, 徐方姝, 等. 辽宁避暑旅游气候条件分析和气象指数研究[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2018, 41(4): 34-40.
[17] 魏凤英. 现代气候统计诊断与预测技术[M]. 第2版. 北京: 气象出版社, 2007: 271.