人脸识别技术法律规制研究

Research on Legal Regulation of Face Recognition

摘要: 郭兵诉杭州动物世界采集游客人脸信息一案的判决存在对人脸生物识别信息获取和处理的必要性论证不足的问题，必要性应是比例原则在个人信息处理领域的展开，知情同意原则是意思自治在个人信息处理领域的体现。使用人脸识别技术在符合合法、正当、必要原则的前提下，还要严格遵守知情同意原则，不得以不同意为由拒绝提供服务。面对人脸识别技术运用扩大化趋势，应当严守上述两原则，并通过严格把控技术准入、增加公众参与、扩展救济渠道等加以规范。

Abstract: The judgment of Guo Bing v. Hangzhou Wildlife World on collecting tourists’ face information is insufficient to demonstrate the necessity of obtaining and processing facial information. The principle of necessity should be the expansion of proportional principle in the field of personal information processing, and the informed consent principle is the embodiment of autonomy of meaning in the field of personal information processing. The use of face recognition in accordance with the legal, legitimate and necessary principles of the premise, but also strictly abide by the informed consent principle, do not refuse service on the grounds of non-consent. In view of the trend of the expansion of face recognition technology, the above two principles should be strictly observed and regulated by strictly controlling technology access, increasing public participation, and expanding relief channels.