电子商务平台经营者“相应的责任”的法律性质
The Legal Nature of the “Corresponding Responsibility” of E-Commerce Platform Operators
摘要: 随着电子商务经济的迅速发展,电商平台经营者的角色已从传统的“中立者”转变为营利者和控制者。《电子商务法》首次规定了电商平台在普通商品和服务领域的责任,以及在关系消费者生命健康的特殊领域的审核义务和安全保障义务。然而,该法中对于“相应的责任”的模糊表述导致了司法适用上的不一致,因此需要对其进行明晰。在此基础上,对电商平台经营者的具体责任形态进行认定,以决定其在不同领域的具体责任。其中,对于平台应尽的审核义务和安保义务,应进行区分并进行相应责任的界定。
Abstract:
With the rapid development of e-commerce economy, the role of e-commerce platform operators has changed from the traditional “neutral” to profit and control. For the first time, the E-commerce Law stipulates the responsibilities of e-commerce platforms in the field of general goods and services, as well as the audit obligations and security obligations in special fields related to the life and health of consumers. However, the vague expression of “corresponding responsibility” in the law leads to inconsistencies in judicial application, so it needs to be clarified. On this basis, the specific forms of responsibility of e-commerce platform operators are identified to determine their specific responsibilities in different fields. Among them, the audit obligations and security obligations of the platform should be distinguished and the corresponding responsibilities should be defined.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
赵旭东. 中华人民共和国电子商务法释义与原理[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2018: 239-240.
|
|
[2]
|
柴伟伟. 电子商务法第三十八条之解读[J]. 人民司法, 2019(1): 17-20.
|
|
[3]
|
王道发. 电子商务平台经营者安保责任研究[J]. 中国法学, 2019(6): 282-300.
|
|
[4]
|
孙晋, 袁野. 论平台经营者的民事法律责任——《电子商务法》第38条第2款的解释论[J]. 财经法学, 2020(1): 53-63.
|
|
[5]
|
王轶. 论侵权责任法中的损失分配制度[J]. 社会科学战线, 2010(9): 156-160.
|
|
[6]
|
马更新. 平台经营者“相应的责任”认定标准及具体化——对电子商务法第38条第2款的分析[J]. 东方法学, 2021(2): 86-97.
|
|
[7]
|
周樨平. 电子商务平台的安全保障义务及其法律责任[J]. 学术研究, 2019(6): 66-73.
|
|
[8]
|
薛亦飒. “电子商务平台”侵权“相应的责任”之定性分析——连带责任抑或按份责任? [J]. 北京化工大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(1): 48-54.
|
|
[9]
|
杨立新. 电子商务法规定的电子商务交易法律关系主体及类型[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(2): 110-120.
|
|
[10]
|
曾娜. 从“连带责任”到“相应责任”——《电子商务法》第38条第2款评析[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2019, 33(5): 128-134.
|
|
[11]
|
杨立新. 《侵权责任法》规定的网络侵权责任的理解与解释[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2010(2): 5.
|