商标反向混淆侵权损害赔偿研究
Research on Compensation for Infringement Damages of Trademark Reverse Confusion
摘要: 在商标侵权纠纷中,商标反向混淆是理论与实务界较为关注的论题。损害赔偿计算标准是商标侵权损害赔偿制度的重要内容,建立符合反向混淆特点的损害赔偿计算标准是解决我国商标反向混淆侵权损害赔偿问题的关键所在。在我国司法实践中,商标反向混淆损害赔偿存在侵权损害赔偿计算标准不一,法定赔偿的适用比例过高,损害赔偿数额确定依据模糊等问题。本文通过对美国相关反向混淆损害赔偿司法实践的梳理,结合我国立法规范,认为应当摒弃权利人损失计算方式,慎用侵权获利计算方式,并参考许可使用费的合理倍数确定损害赔偿数额,并且尽快建立法定赔偿的量化标准体系。
Abstract:
In the trademark infringement disputes, trademark reverse confusion is a hot topic in the field of theory and practice. The calculation standard of damages is an important part of the system of damages for trademark infringement. Establishing the calculation standard of damages according with the characteristics of reverse confusion is the key to solve the problem. In the judicial practice in China, with respect to compensation for damages of reverse trademark confusion, there are such problems as different calculation standards for infringement damages, too high a proportion of application of statutory compensation, and ambiguous basis for determining the amount of damages. This article, by sorting out the relevant judicial practices of reverse confusion damages in the United States and based on our legislative norms, believes that the loss calculation method of the right holder should be abandoned, the infringement profits calculation method should be used with caution, and the amount of damages should be determined with reference to a reasonable multiple of the royalty, and the quantitative standard system for statutory damages should be established as soon as possible.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
邓宏光. 商标反向混淆的司法应对[J]. 人民司法, 2017(10): 16-21.
|
|
[2]
|
王华钰. 对我国商标反向混淆侵权问题的反思[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 47(1): 81-88.
|
|
[3]
|
俞吟艳. 论商标反向混淆侵权损害赔偿数额的认定——以“新百伦”商标侵权案为例[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版), 2015(12): 27-29.
|
|
[4]
|
张萌. 从“非诚勿扰案”浅析商标反向混淆理论及其处理机制[J]. 黑河学刊, 2019(1): 109-112.
|
|
[5]
|
基芳婷. 商标反向混淆侵权赔偿研究[D]: 武汉: [硕士学位论文]. 中南财经政法大学, 2016.
|
|
[6]
|
吴汉东. 知识产权损害赔偿的市场价值基础与司法裁判规则[J]. 中外法学, 2016, 28(6): 1480-1494.
|
|
[7]
|
杨立新. 侵权责任法(第四版) [M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020.
|
|
[8]
|
詹映. 我国知识产权侵权损害赔偿司法现状再调查与再思考——基于我国11984件知识产权侵权司法判例的深度分析[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2020, 38(1): 191-200.
|
|
[9]
|
杜颖译. 美国商标法[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2013.
|
|
[10]
|
黄武双, 黄骥. 美国商标案件金钱偿还数额的计算: 原理与判例[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014.
|
|
[11]
|
李明德. 美国知识产权法(第二版) [M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014.
|
|
[12]
|
贺文奕. 论商标反向混淆中金钱救济的适用[J]. 电子知识产权, 2021(8): 86-100.
|