基于卷积神经网络加速的计算鬼成像物体识别仿真
Simulation of Computational Ghost Image Object Recognition Accelerated by Convolutional Neural Networks
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2024.134385, PDF,   
作者: 陈耀东:上海理工大学光电信息与计算机工程学院,上海;上海理工大学光子芯片研究院,上海;华怡林:上海理工大学光子芯片研究院,上海
关键词: 计算鬼成像卷积神经网络物体识别Computational Ghost Imaging Convolutional Neural Network Object Recognition
摘要: 鬼成像是利用两束光的空间相关性来进行成像的一种新的成像方式,具有成像方式灵活,探测器易获取等优势。作为其中的重要分支,计算鬼成像直接采用随时间变化的散斑照明图像,利用多个散斑模式和穿过物体后的总光子计数之间的关联性来计算恢复图像,可结合单像素相机,在遥感、光学加密以及边缘检测等方向发挥重要作用,同时使得通过计算机仿真鬼成像结果成为可能。然而,为了获取高的成像质量,切换大量散斑图是必要的,这阻碍了它在快速成像和图像处理等方面的应用,因此,快速获取物体信息成为计算鬼成像的核心。基于此,本文设计了一个带有全连接层的四层卷积神经网络(CNN)用于计算鬼成像图像的快速识别,可以在一些物体识别比成像更重要的场景下(如医学图像诊断)发挥作用。通过对差分鬼成像的数值仿真结果的分析,证明了所提出的卷积神经网络可以在散斑数量是相对于完整测量的1/20的情形下,实现对低分辨率物体的接近1的识别准确度。使得CGI物体识别的等效采样率约为0.05,这大大提高了计算鬼成像中的信息获取速度。这种先于成像过程的卷积神经网络可广泛应用于与经典和量子鬼成像及其他计算成像方案如单像素成像,散射成像和无透镜成像等。
Abstract: Ghost imaging is a new paradigm of imaging that harness the spatial correlation of the two separated light fields for reconstruction of an unknown image. It has the advantages of flexible imaging strategies and easily accessible imaging equipment. As an important branch, computational ghost imaging (CGI) directly uses time-varying speckles to illuminate anobject, utilizing the correlation between multiple speckle patterns and the total photon counts after passing through the object to calculate the restored the image. It can be combined with a single pixel camera to play an important role in various areas such as remote sensing, optical encryption, and edge detection, meanwhile providing the possibility to simulate the ghost imaging process through computer calculation. However, in order to achieve a high image contrast, it is necessary to switch a large number of speckle patterns, which hinders its application in fast imaging and image processing. Therefore, quickly obtaining object information has become the core of computational ghost imaging. Therefore, quickly obtaining object information has become the core of computing ghost imaging. Here, we designed a four-layer convolutional neural network (CNN) with fully connected layers for fast recognition of ghost imaging images, which can be effective in the scenarios (medical image diagnosis for instance) that recognition of objects is more important than imaging. Through the analysis of numerical simulation results of differential ghost imaging under different speckle numbers, we proved that the proposed convolutional neural network can achieve near-unity recognition accuracy of the low-resolution objects restored with a 1/20th of the number of speckles relative to the complete measurement. This leads to an equivalent sampling ratio of approximately 0.05 for the CGI object recognition, which greatly improves the speed of information acquisition in computing ghost imaging. This recognition method prior to the imaging process can be widely used in classical and quantum ghost imaging as well as other computation imaging schemes like single-pixel imaging, scattering imaging and lensless imaging.
文章引用:陈耀东, 华怡林. 基于卷积神经网络加速的计算鬼成像物体识别仿真[J]. 建模与仿真, 2024, 13(4): 4249-4257. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2024.134385

参考文献

[1] Paul-Antoine, M., Ermes, T., et al. (2017) Ghost Imaging Using Optical Correlations. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 12, Article 1700143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 吴自文, 邱晓东, 陈理想. 关联成像技术研究现状及展望[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2020, 57(6): 1-17.
[3] Pittman, T.B., Shih, Y.H., Strekalov, D.V., et al. (1995) Optical Imaging by Means of Two-Photon Quantum Entanglement. Physical Review A, 52, R3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Bennink, R.S., Bentley, S.J. and Boyd, R.W. (2002) “Two-Photon” Coincidence Imaging with a Classical Source. Physical Review Letters, 89, Article 113601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Valencia, A., Scarcelli, G., D’Angelo, M., et al. (2005) Two-Photon Imaging with Thermal Light. Physical Review Letters, 94, Article 063601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Zhang, D., Zhai, Y.H., Wu, L.A., et al. (2005) Correlated Two-Photon Imaging with True Thermal Light. Optics Letters, 30, 2354-2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Pelliccia, D., Rack, A., Scheel, M., et al. (2016) Experimental X-Ray Ghost Imaging. Physical Review Letters, 117, Article 113902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Liu, X., Wang, F., Zhang, M., et al. (2015) Experimental Demonstration of Ghost Imaging with an Electromagnetic Gaussian Schell-Model Beam. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 32, 910-920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 赵生妹, 赵亮, 郭辉, 等. 鬼成像原理与进展研究[J]. 南京邮电大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(1): 65-77.
[10] Kong, L.J., Li, Y., Qian, S.X., et al. (2013) Encryption of Ghost Imaging. Physical Review A, 88, Article 013852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Liu, X.F., Yao, X.R., Lan, R.M., et al. (2015) Edge Detection Based on Gradient Ghost Imaging. Optics Express, 23, 33802-33811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Meyers, R.E., Deacon, K.S. and Shih, Y. (2011) Turbulence-Free Ghost Imaging. Applied Physics Letters, 98, Article 111115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Erkmen, B.I. (2012) Computational Ghost Imaging for Remote Sensing. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 29, 782-789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Zhang, Z., Ma, X. and Zhong, J. (2015) Single-Pixel Imaging by Means of Fourier Spectrum Acquisition. Nature Communications, 6, Article No. 6225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Wang, L. and Zhao, S. (2016) Fast Reconstructed and High-Quality Ghost Imaging with Fast Walsh-Hadamard Transform. Photonics Research, 4, 240-244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Katz, O., Bromberg, Y. and Silberberg, Y. (2009) Compressive Ghost Imaging. Applied Physics Letters, 95, Article 131110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Hu, X., Suo, J., Yue, T., et al. (2015) Patch-Primitive Driven Compressive Ghost Imaging. Optics Express, 23, 11092-11104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Zhao, Y.N., Chen, L.S., Chen, L.Y., et al. (2024) Computational Ghost Imaging with Hybrid Transforms by Integrating Hadamard, Discrete Cosine, and Haar Matrices. arxiv:2405.03729.
[19] Wang, W., Wang, Y, P., Li, J., et al. (2014) Iterative Ghost Imaging. Optics Letters, 39, 5150-5153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Wang, W., Hu, X., Liu, J., et al. (2015) Gerchberg-Saxton-Like Ghost Imaging. Optics Express, 23, 28416-28422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Liu, H.-C. (2020) Imaging Reconstruction Comparison of Different Ghost Imaging Algorithms. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 14626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. and Hinton, G. (2015) Deep Learning. Nature, 521, 436-444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Shinde, P.P. and Shah, S. (2018) A Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications. 2018 Fourth International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation, Pune, 16-18 August 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Jiao, L. and Zhao, J. (2019) A Survey on the New Generation of Deep Learning in Image Processing. Ieee Access, 7, 172231-172263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Barbastathis, G., Ozcan, A. and Situ, G. (2019) On the Use of Deep Learning for Computational Imaging. Optica, 6, 921-943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Rizvi, S., Cao, J., Zhang, K., et al. (2020) DeepGhost: Real-Time Computational Ghost Imaging via Deep Learning. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 11400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Lyu, M., Wang, W., Wang, H., et al. (2017) Deep-Learning-Based Ghost Imaging. Scientific Reports, 7, Article No. 17865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Wang, F., Wang, H., Wang, H., et al. (2019) Learning from Simulation: An End-to-End Deep-Learning Approach for Computational Ghost Imaging. Optics Express, 27, 25560-25572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Moodley, C., Ruget, A., Leach, J., et al. (2023) Time-Efficient Object Recognition in Quantum Ghost Imaging. Advanced Quantum Technologies, 6, Article 2200109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] 肖许意, 陈刘雅, 张学智, 等. 单像素成像及其概率统计分析综述[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2021, 58(10): 230-241.
[31] Boominathan, V., Robinson, J.T., Waller, L., et al. (2022) Recent Advances in Lensless Imaging. Optica, 9, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Postnov, D.D., Tang, J., Erdener, S.E., et al. (2020) Dynamic Light Scattering Imaging. Science Advances, 6, eabc4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Dong, C., Loy, C.C., He, K., et al. (2015) Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38, 295-307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Sun, Y., Zhang, W., Gu, H., et al. (2019) Convolutional Neural Network Based Models for Improving Super-Resolution Imaging. IEEE Access, 7, 43042-43051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef