无“归”与有“归”:《渔家傲》与《如梦令》之比较阅读教学
Without “Return” and with “Return”: The Comparative Reading Teaching of Yu Jia Ao and Ru Meng Ling
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2024.1471156, PDF,   
作者: 张好玲:佛山大学人文与教育学院,广东 佛山
关键词: 比较阅读李清照教学法Comparative Reading Qingzhao Li Didactics
摘要: 传统古诗词教学中的单篇“精读精讲”模式潜存着割裂诗词与关联诗词的链接关系、僵硬化诗词外显内容与内隐意蕴关系的弊端,无法让学生真正体会诗词背后的意蕴。然而教师却能借助诗词比较阅读的方法,帮助学生在比较阅读中整体认知与深层把握诗词内容,不断丰富自身对诗词的独特审美体验。
Abstract: The single mode of “intensive reading and intensive speaking” in the traditional teaching of ancient poetry has the disadvantages of separating the link between poetry and related poetry, and rigid the relationship between the explicit content and implicit implication of poetry, which cannot make students truly understand the implication behind poetry. However, teachers can use the method of comparative reading of poetry to help students with the overall cognition and deep grasp of the content of poetry in comparative reading, and constantly enrich their own unique aesthetic experience of poetry.
文章引用:张好玲. 无“归”与有“归”:《渔家傲》与《如梦令》之比较阅读教学[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(7): 267-271. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2024.1471156

参考文献

[1] 徐晓博. 诗歌鉴赏中的“四维比较阅读法” [J]. 吉林教育, 2015(1): 33-34.
[2] 池丽. 意象互文性与古诗词深层阅读——以李清照《声声慢》为例[J]. 中学语文, 2024(1): 49-51.
[3] 祝伟. 香远益清 婉丽可爱——李清照《如梦令·常记溪亭日暮》解析[J]. 临沂师专学报, 1990(1): 49-54.
[4] 张忠纲, 綦维. 李清照的女性意识[J]. 文史哲, 2001(5): 38-42.
[5] 陈祖美. 李清照诗词文选注[M]. 上海: 上海远东出版社, 2011.
[6] 夏承焘. 唐宋词欣赏[M]. 杭州: 浙江古籍出版社, 2012.
[7] 杜丽萍. 李清照《渔家傲·天接云涛连晓雾》文本解读[J]. 长江小说鉴赏, 2023(27): 93-96.