基于Shapley值的犹豫模糊TODIM方法及其在可持续供应商选择中的应用
Shapley Value Based Hesitant Fuzzy TODIM Method and Its Application in Sustainable Supplier Selection
DOI: 10.12677/mse.2024.134076, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘小月, 宋嘉思：对外经济贸易大学信息学院，北京；鞠大伟：中国邮政集团有限公司邮政研究中心，邮政科学研究规划院，北京
关键词: 可持续供应商选择；TODIM方法；Shapley值；有限理性；Sustainable Supplier Selection； TODIM Method； Shapley Value； Bounded Rationality
摘要: 可持续供应商选择是指企业在考虑经济、社会和环境因素的基础上，选择最合适的供应商。为解决此问题，本文提出了基于Shapley值的犹豫模糊TODIM方法。首先，针对指标间存在的相互影响关系，使用基于模糊测度的Shapley值处理所有指标间的相互作用。其次，犹豫模糊数既可以有效反映决策者的意见，又能体现决策者的犹豫不决，针对犹豫模糊环境下决策者的有限理性问题，对TODIM方法进行拓展，提出犹豫模糊TODIM方法，求得备选方案的排序及择优。最后，将方法应用于可持续供应商选择问题，以说明方法的有效性。
Abstract: Sustainable supplier selection refers to the selection of the most appropriate supplier by a company considering economic, social and environmental factors. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a hesitant fuzzy TODIM method based on Shapley value. Firstly, for the interactions that exist between indicators, the Shapley value based on fuzzy measures is used to deal with the interactions between all indicators. Secondly, the hesitation fuzzy number can effectively reflect both the decision maker’s opinion and the decision maker’s indecision, and in order to address the bounded rationality of the decision maker in the hesitation fuzzy environment, the TODIM method is extended and the hesitation fuzzy TODIM method is proposed to find the ranking and optimization of the alternatives. Finally, the method is applied to the sustainable supplier selection problem to illustrate the effectiveness of the method.
文章引用：刘小月, 宋嘉思, 鞠大伟. 基于Shapley值的犹豫模糊TODIM方法及其在可持续供应商选择中的应用[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2024, 13(4): 726-735. https://doi.org/10.12677/mse.2024.134076

参考文献

[1] Xing, Y., Cao, M., Liu, Y., Zhou, M. and Wu, J. (2022) A Choquet Integral Based Interval Type-2 Trapezoidal Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making for Sustainable Supplier Selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 165, Article 107935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Zhang, S., Zhu, J., Liu, X. and Chen, Y. (2016) Regret Theory-Based Group Decision-Making with Multidimensional Preference and Incomplete Weight Information. Information Fusion, 31, 1-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Figueira, J., Greco, S. and Ehrogott, M. (2005) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Gomes, L.F.A.M. and Lima, M.M.P.P. (1991) TODIM: Basic and Application to Multicriteria Ranking of Projects with Environmental Impacts. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 16, 113-127.
[6] Li, M.-Y. and Cao, P.-P. (2019) Extended TODIM Method for Multi-Attribute Risk Decision Making Problems in Emergency Response. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 1286-1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Choquet, G. (1954) Theory of Capacities. Annales de l’institut Fourier, 5, 131-295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Wei, G. and Zhang, N. (2014) A Multiple Criteria Hesitant Fuzzy Decision Making with Shapley Value-Based VIKOR Method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 26, 1065-1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Lourenzutti, R., Krohling, R.A. and Reformat, M.Z. (2017) Choquet Based TOPSIS and TODIM for Dynamic and Heterogeneous Decision Making with Criteria Interaction. Information Sciences, 408, 41-69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 张永政, 叶春明, 耿秀丽, 等. 基于犹豫模糊广义Choquet积分的风险型供应商选择方法[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2019, 24(4): 47-54.
[11] Bellman, R.E. and Zadeh, L.A. (1970) Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment. Management Science, 17, B141-B164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Atanassov, K.T. (1986) Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Torra, V. (2010) Hesitant Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25, 529-539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Sugeno, M. (1974) Theory of Fuzzy Integrals and Its Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
[15] Joshi, D. and Kumar, S. (2016) Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Hesitant Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based TOPSIS Method for Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making. European Journal of Operational Research, 248, 183-191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Tan, C.Q., Jiang, Z.-Z. and Chen, X.H. (2015) An Extended TODIM Method for Hesitant Fuzzy Interactive Multicriteria Decision Making Based on Generalized Choquet Integral. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 29, 293-305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] 曲国华, 张汉鹏, 刘增良, 等. 基于直觉模糊λ-Shapley Choquet积分算子TOPSIS的多属性群决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(3): 726-742.
[18] Zhang, W., Ju, Y., Liu, X. and Giannakis, M. (2017) A Mathematical Programming-Based Method for Heterogeneous Multicriteria Group Decision Analysis with Aspirations and Incomplete Preference Information. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 541-557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Xia, M. and Xu, Z. (2011) Hesitant Fuzzy Information Aggregation in Decision Making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52, 395-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Xu, Z. and Xia, M. (2011) Distance and Similarity Measures for Hesitant Fuzzy Sets. Information Sciences, 181, 2128-2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] 张小路. 基于犹豫模糊信息的多属性决策方法研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 南京: 东南大学, 2016.
[22] Xu, Z. and Xia, M. (2011) On Distance and Correlation Measures of Hesitant Fuzzy Information. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 26, 410-425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] 牟能冶, 常建鹏, 陈振颂. 基于PD-HFLTS与群决策理论的可持续供应商选择[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(5): 1261-1278.

为你推荐