语义图示、语义图式和语义图之辨析
Concept Distinctions among Semantic Diagram, Semantic Schema and Semantic Map
DOI: 10.12677/ve.2024.134166, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘 畅：四川外国语大学中国语言文化学院，重庆
关键词: 语义图示；语义图式；语义图；Semantic Diagram； Semantic Schema； Semantic Map
摘要: 语义图示、语义图式和语义图，是一组较为相近的概念。三者既有联系，又有区别。对这三个概念做一个区分，有助于相关领域的研究者们开展各自领域的研究，以避免概念之间相互混用。实际上，这三个概念都是复合概念。三者之间的区别，可以从图示、图式和图这三个基本概念入手来做一个区分。图是一个统称概念，是各类图的上位概念，图示是一个具体概念，通常是由可视的图形或图像构成的，而图式则是一个心理学概念，用以指称个体心中的认知结构。
Abstract: Semantic diagram, semantic schema, and semantic map are a group of similar concepts. They are related and distinct. It helps researchers not mix them up by distinguishing these three concepts. In fact, all three concepts are compound concepts. The differences among them differ in the three basic concepts of diagram, schema and graph. Graph is a general concept which consists of various types of drawings. Diagram is a specific concept which usually composes of visual figures or images. Schema is a psychological concept which refers to the cognitive structure in the individual’s mind.
文章引用：刘畅. 语义图示、语义图式和语义图之辨析[J]. 职业教育发展, 2024, 13(4): 1027-1038. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2024.134166

参考文献

[1] 顾小清, 李利, 王为杰, 等. 以“语义图示”实现可视化知识表征与建模的理论与实践研究[EB/OL]. 2013-01-09.
http://www.deit.ecnu.edu.cn/1d/0c/c26179a269580/page.htm, 2024-02-01.
[2] 顾小清, 权国龙. 以语义图示实现可视化知识表征与建模的研究综述[J]. 电化教育研究, 2014, 35(5): 45-52.
[3] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 技术制图通用术语: GB/T 13361-2012[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012: 1.
[4] Mayer, R.E. (2009) Multimedia Learning. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, 223-280.
[5] Garland, K. (1979) Some General Characteristics Present in Diagrams Denoting Activity, Event and Relationship. Information Design Journal, 1, 15-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] 许哲. 教育语义图示的模型构建与应用验证[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2015.
[7] Burkhard, R.A. (2005) Knowledge Visualization: The Use of Complementary Visual Representation for the Transfer of Knowledge, a Model, a Framework and Four New Approaches. Ph.D. Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.
[8] 康德. 纯粹理性批判[M]. 邓晓芒, 杨祖陶, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2004: 140.
[9] Bartlett, F.C. (1932) Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press, 222.
[10] 皮亚杰, 英海尔德. 儿童心理学[M]. 吴福元, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1981: 5.
[11] 顾小清, 冯园园, 胡思畅. 超越碎片化学习: 语义图示与深度学习[J]. 中国电化教育, 2015(3): 43.
[12] Dragon, T., Mavrikis, M., McLaren, B.M., Harrer, A., Kynigos, C., Wegerif, R. and Yang, Y. (2013) Metafora: A Web-Based Platform for Learning to Learn Together in Science and Mathematics. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technology, 6, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Anderson, L.B. (1982) The “Perfect” as a Universal and as a Language-Particular Category. In: Hopper, P.J., Ed., Tense-Aspect: Between Semantic and Pragmatics, John Benjamins, 227-264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Haspelmath, M. (2000) The Geometry of Grammatical Meaning: Semantic Maps and Cross-Linguistic Comparison. In: Tomasello, M., Ed., The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1-30.
[15] 张定. “穿戴”动词语义图[J]. 当代语言学, 2017, 19(4): 546-560.
[16] Johnson, D.D., Pittelman, S.D. and Heimlich, J.E. (1986) Semantic Mapping. The Reading Teacher, 39, 779.
[17] Shrum, J.L. and Glisan, E.W. (2010) Teacher’s Handbook: Contextualized Language Instruction. 4th Edition, Heinle Cengage Learning, 107-505.
[18] Curtain, H.A. and Dahlberg, C.A. (2004) Languages and Children—Making the Match. 3rd Edition, Pearson Allyn & Bacon, 167.

为你推荐