隔代探望权：实践、困境与规范

Intergenerational Visitation Rights: Practice, Dilemmas and Norms

摘要: 司法裁判对于隔代探望权的认识存在较大差异，导致裁判结果和标准并不一致，甚至出现“同案不同判”的现象。在是否支持隔代探望权上，法无禁止即可为、权利义务相一致以及老年人权益保护原则等理由存在适用困境。应坚持“儿童利益最大化”原则，对隔代探望权进行类型化区分，并通过发布指导性案例的方式确立隔代探望权的行使条件、行使方式，有利于促进裁判统一。

Abstract: There are great differences in the understanding of intergenerational visitation right in judicial adjudication, resulting in inconsistent results and standards, and even the phenomenon of “different sentences in the same case”. In terms of whether to support the right of intergenerational visitation, there are difficulties in the application of the reasons such as the law can be done without prohibition, the rights and obligations are consistent, and the principle of protecting the rights and interests of the elderly. We should adhere to the principle of “maximizing the interests of children”, distinguish the types of intergenerational visitation right, and establish the exercise conditions and ways of intergenerational visitation right by issuing guiding cases, which is conducive to promoting the unification of judgment.