消费民事公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿金处置路径研究
Study on Punitive Damages Disposal Path of Consumer Civil Public Interest Litigation
DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.127629, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 郑科技:甘肃政法大学民商经济法学院,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 消费民事公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿金处置路径Consumer Civil Public Interest Litigation Punitive Damages Disposal Path
摘要: 我国法律未明文规定消费民事公益诉讼中惩罚性赔偿金的具体处置路径,但是在司法实务中法院似乎对这一问题已经有了明确的答案。在借鉴美国消费集团诉讼的多维度功能后,我国消费民事公益诉讼的功能应当被重构为“威慑–补偿”二元结构。在该二元结构功能指导下,对实务中的惩罚性赔偿金具体处置路径进行匹配性评估,并对适配性的处置路径进行系统矛盾的调适和内部结构的优化。
Abstract: China’s law does not explicitly stipulate the specific disposition path of punitive damages in consumer civil public interest litigation, but in judicial practice, the court seems to have a clear answer to this problem. After learning from the multi-dimensional function of American consumer group litigation, the function of China’s consumer civil public interest litigation should be reconstructed into the dual structure of “deterrence-compensation”. Under the guidance of the dual structure function, the matching evaluation is carried out on the specific disposal path of punitive damages in practice, and the adjustment of the system contradiction and the optimization of the internal structure of the adaptive disposal path are carried out.
文章引用:郑科技. 消费民事公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿金处置路径研究[J]. 法学, 2024, 12(7): 4424-4428. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2024.127629

参考文献

[1] 杜万华. 最高人民法院消费民事公益诉讼司法解释理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版, 2016.
[2] Barnett, K. (1987) Equitable Trusts: An Effective Remedy in Consumer Class Actions. The Yale Law Journal, 96, 1591-1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 杜乐其. 消费民事公益诉讼损害赔偿请求权研究[J]. 法律科学, 2017(6): 168-180.
[4] 颜卉. 检察机关在消费民事公益诉讼中提出惩罚性赔偿诉讼请求的规范化路径——(2017)粤01民初383号民事判决的启示[J]. 兰州学刊, 2018(12): 103-112.
[5] 刘水林, 芦波. 消费者权益保护法范式转化的经济学解释[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2016, 18(6): 93-104.
[6] 陶建国, 谢佳欣. 论现行立法背景下消费公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿请求的不当性[J]. 前沿, 2021(3): 66-74.
[7] 肖建国, 宋春龙. 检察机关提起消费公益诉讼范围分析[J]. 人民检察, 2016(14): 23-27.
[8] 杨雅妮, 刘磊. 消费民事公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿的实践与反思——以776份判决书为基础的分析[J]. 南海法学, 2022(3): 92-105.
[9] 章海珠. 检察机关提起惩罚性消费民事公益诉讼之探讨[J]. 社会科学家, 2019(7): 111-118.