论犯罪未遂形态的认定
On the Identification of Criminal Attempt Morphology
DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.127646, PDF,   
作者: 马肖光:长春理工大学法学院,吉林 长春
关键词: 未遂形态认定标准刑事责任Incomplete Form Identification Standards Criminal Responsibility
摘要: 关于犯罪未遂形态的认定,一直是学术界争论不休的热点话题。一方面,在未遂形态的认定上,有关未遂形态的认定标准和构成要件存在各种不同观点的学说,从而很难对未遂形态的认定上形成统一的共识;另一方面,在实践中,各种犯罪行为方式层出不穷,许多犯罪行为介于预备与着手、中止与未遂的中间地带,故对于犯罪形态的认定上,也具有复杂性。而犯罪的未遂形态与犯罪预备、中止以及既遂形态具有密切联系,因此,通过对犯罪未遂形态的认定进行探讨和研究,有利于正确认定犯罪形态,并指导司法实践,从而正确地追究行为人的刑事责任。
Abstract: The identification of criminal attempt morphology has always been a hot topic of debate in the academic community. On the one hand, there are various different views on the identification standards and constitutive requirements of the incomplete form of crime, which makes it difficult to reach a unified consensus on the identification of incomplete forms of crime. On the other hand, in practice, various criminal behavior methods emerge endlessly, and many criminal behaviors are located between preparation and onset, between interruption and incomplete form, making the identification of criminal behavior complex. The incomplete form of crime is closely related to the preliminary stage of crime, interruption and completion stage. Therefore, through the exploration and research on the identification of incomplete form of crime, it is conducive to correctly identifying the morphology of crime, guiding judicial practice, and correctly pursuing the criminal responsibility of the perpetrator.
文章引用:马肖光. 论犯罪未遂形态的认定[J]. 法学, 2024, 12(7): 4530-4534. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2024.127646

参考文献

[1] 彭文华. 犯罪既遂原理[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2013: 48.
[2] 高铭暄, 马克昌. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 高等教育出社, 2000: 149.
[3] 杨春燕. 刑法学[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2015: 130.
[4] 林亚刚, 沈明. 如何确定犯罪未遂中“意志以外的原因” [N]. 检察日报, 2004-02-25(8).
[5] 张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 1997: 258.
[6] 刘博卿. 实行行为着手研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2016.
[7] 马荣春, 霍立群. 与犯罪形态有关的三个特别问题[J]. 山东警察学院学报, 2013, 25(1): 51-55.
[8] 张钟祺. 论犯罪中止的有效性[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2021.