基于数值模拟的双隧道净距对地表沉降的影响分析
Analysis of the Effect of the Clear Distance between Two Tunnels on Surface Subsidence Based on Numerical Simulation
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2024.134412, PDF,   
作者: 王 帅, 苏哲阳, 于王成, 李佩青:上海理工大学环境与建筑学院,上海
关键词: 地表沉降数值模拟双线隧道Surface Subsidence Numerical Simulation Double-Track Tunnels
摘要: 为了解决设计施工不当引发的地表沉降过大、上方路面塌陷、构筑物沉降等问题。利用MIDASGTSNX软件建立隧道三维数值模型,通过研究双隧道的隧道净距对地表沉降的影响情况。结果表明:双隧道净距较小时,地表沉降曲线呈“V”型,最大沉降位于两隧道中间;当两隧道净距不断增大,地表沉降曲线形状发生改变,逐渐转变为“W”型,地表最大沉降值随着净距增大而减小,且位于先行隧道上方,为保证工程安全,选择双隧道净距为15 m的工况。
Abstract: In order to solve the problems caused by improper design and construction, such as excessive surface subsidence, upper road collapse and structure settlement. The tunnel three-dimensional numerical model is setup by using MIDAS GTSNX software, through changing the clear distance between two tunnels to show the influence on surface subsidence. The results show that: when the clear distance between the two tunnels is small, the surface settlement curve is “V”, and the maximum settlement is located in the middle of the two tunnels; when the clear distance between the two tunnels is increasing, the shape of the surface settlement curve changes, gradually transforming into a “W”, the maximum surface settlement value decreases with the increase of the clear distance, and is located above the first tunnel. The maximum settlement value decreases with the increase of the clear distance, and it is located above the first tunnel, to ensure the safety of the project, choose the working condition that the clear distance between the two tunnels is 15 m.
文章引用:王帅, 苏哲阳, 于王成, 李佩青. 基于数值模拟的双隧道净距对地表沉降的影响分析[J]. 建模与仿真, 2024, 13(4): 4549-4557. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2024.134412

参考文献

[1] 杨福麟, 刘永林, 胡斌. 武汉地铁隧道开挖引起地表沉降的数字模拟研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2013, 21(1): 85-91.
[2] Peck, R.B. (1969) Deep Excavations and Tunneling in Soft Ground. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, 225-290.
[3] O’Reilly, M.P. and New, B.M. (1982) Settlement above Tunnels in the United Kingdom—Their Magnitude and Prediction. In: Jones, M.J., Ed., Tunnelling ’82, Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, 173-181.
[4] 刘建航, 侯学渊. 盾构隧道[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 1991.
[5] Wei, G. (2013) Prediction of Soil Settlement Caused by Double-Line Parallel Shield Tunnel Construction. Disaster Advances, 6, 23-27.
[6] 姜忻良, 赵志民, 李园. 隧道开挖引起土层沉降槽曲线形态的分析与计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2004(10): 1542-1544.
[7] 孙玉永, 周顺华, 宫全美. 软土地区盾构掘进引起的深层位移场分布规律[J]. 岩土力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(3): 500-506.
[8] 郭社军, 郝晓龙, 舒国明. Peck公式在小半径曲线隧道沉降分析的应用[J]. 公路, 2020, 65(8): 405-408.
[9] 赵菁菁, 宿文姬. 深圳地铁近接隧道暗挖施工地表沉降控制[J]. 隧道建设, 2014, 34(11): 1055-1061.
[10] Miliziano, S. and Lillis, A.D. (2019) Predicted and Observed Settlements Induced by the Mechanized Tunnel Excavation of Metro Line C near S. Giovanni Station in Rome. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 86, 236-246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 鲍先凯, 曹嘉星, 段东明, 等. Midas/GTS在软岩隧道施工设计中的应用[J]. 公路, 2019, 7(7): 321-325.
[12] Ding, Z., Ji, X., Lin, X., et al. (2019) Numerical Investigation of 3D Deformations of Existing Buildings Induced by Tunneling. Geotech Geology, 37, 2611-2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 董立鹏, 聂清浩, 孙晓坤, 曹伍富, 寇鼎涛, 白志强, 杨陕南. 基于皮尔逊相关系数法的盾构掘进参数对地表沉降影响分析[J]. 施工技术(中英文), 2024, 53(1): 116-123.
[14] 樊虎, 庄妍, 宋相伟. 运营期浅埋公路隧道拱顶覆土层力学分析模型及沉降规律研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 55(1): 20-241.
[15] 宫志群, 王永志, 廖少明, 唐聪. 地铁车站明暗挖施工引起的地表沉降叠加效应研究[J]. 施工技术(中英文), 2024, 53(3): 6-13.