从硅谷银行处置看我国问题银行风险监管存在的问题及对策
Problems and Countermeasures of China’s Problematic Bank Risk Supervision from the Disposal of Silicon Valley Bank
摘要: 随着银行业风险不断发生,引发各国银行的信任危机,因此需要厘清各国设计的问题银行处置机制,通过考虑银行风险处置制度的建构与立法目标,以更好地实现制度价值。本文通过对2023年硅谷银行的爆雷事件的介绍,梳理了各国问题银行的处置机制,进而分析我国目前银行风险监管的现状和问题,存在规则冲突、碎片化等问题,结合目前的《金融稳定法(草案)》内容,以及问题银行处置机制的国际经验,提出具体的应对之策。
Abstract: As banking risks continue to occur, triggering a crisis of confidence in banks in various countries, there is a need to clarify the problematic bank disposal mechanism designed by various countries, by considering the construction and legislative objectives of the bank risk disposal system, in order to better realise the value of the system. Through the introduction of the explosion of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023, this paper has sorted out the disposal mechanism of problem banks in various countries, and then analysed the current situation and problems of bank risk regulation in China, and put forward countermeasures by combining the contents of the current Financial Stability Law (Draft).
文章引用:陈颖. 从硅谷银行处置看我国问题银行风险监管存在的问题及对策[J]. 法学, 2024, 12(7): 4535-4542. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2024.127647

参考文献

[1] 蔡鹏程. 三天崩盘, 硅谷银行雷暴事件始末[EB/OL].
https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2023-03-11/doc-imykpkkm2457390.shtml, 2024-05-20.
[2] 孙世选. “硅谷银行事件”与银行服务科创企业的风险防范[J]. 清华金融评论, 2023(7): 93-98.
[3] Huang, Z. (2023) Analysis of Silicon Valley Bank Bankruptcy from the Perspective of Risk Management. Financial Engineering and Risk Management, 6, 75-80.
[4] 鲁莹. 存款保险制度下道德风险的成因及防范机制研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2015.
[5] Allen, K.D., Cyree, K.B., Whitledge, M.D. and Winters, D.B. (2018) An Event Study Analysis of Too-Big-to-Fail after the Dodd-Frank Act: Who Is Too Big to Fail? Journal of Economics and Business, 98, 19-31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 王欢星. 美国《多德弗兰克法》金融监管改革研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国社会科学院研究生院, 2020.
[7] 王欢星. 美国金融监管改革对金融稳定有效性研究——以《多德-弗兰克法》为中心[J]. 经济论坛, 2018(9): 112-116.
[8] 赵先信, 李岩. 国内外系统重要性银行监管比较与思考[J]. 清华金融评论, 2021(9): 61-65.
[9] Curi, C. and Murgia, L.M. (2023) Forecast Targeting and Financial Stability: Evidence from the European Central Bank and Bank of England. Finance Research Letters, 51, Article 103486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 孙天琦. 美国为什么能快速“扑灭”硅谷银行等三家银行的“火情” [EB/OL].
https://finance.sina.com.cn/china/2023-06-07/doc-imywmvhi3739938.shtml, 2024-06-01.
[11] 于品显. 欧盟银行单一处置机制研究[J]. 金融监管研究, 2019(10): 85-100.
[12] Chiarella, L. (2016) The Single Supervisory Mechanism: The Building Pillar of the European Banking Union. University of Bologna Law Review, 1, 34-90.
[13] 董鑫. 中小银行风险处置问题的思考[J]. 石家庄铁道大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 15(4): 17-22.
[14] 焦少飞. 问题银行处置: 框架、实践与启示[J]. 武汉金融, 2017(4): 39-41.
[15] 刘桂平. 建议制定“金融稳定法” [J]. 中国金融, 2021(6): 9-10.
[16] 刘向民. 我国金融机构风险处置的思考[J]. 中国金融, 2018(11): 42-44.
[17] 吴晋科. 运用存款保险机制处置金融机构风险的思考[J]. 征信, 2019, 37(4): 89-92.