人教版与浙教版初中数学例习题的比较研究——以乘法公式为例
A Comparative Study of Junior Middle School Mathematics Example Exercises between People’s Education Edition and Zhejiang Education Edition—Taking Multiplication Formula as an Example
摘要: 本文基于鲍建生提出的数学课程综合难度模型,以“乘法公式”为例,对人教版初中数学教材与浙教版初中数学教材的例习题部分进行比较研究。结果表明:浙教版教材和人教版教材的例习题编写在相同课程标准的统领下,总体趋势保持一致,但相比之下,人教版教材会更注重学生基础知识的掌握,同时也设置了一定比例的挑战练习,给学有余力的同学挑战自我的机会,满足不同能力学生的个性化需求。浙教版教材的例习题设置难度更大,适合基础较好的学生使用,在巩固基础的基础上进阶练习比较多。通过人教版与浙教版初中数学例习题的比较研究,希望对我国初中数学教师在讲解“乘法公式”以及学生在学习这一部分内容时,提供有益的启示。
Abstract: Based on the comprehensive difficulty model of mathematics curriculum proposed by Bao Jiansheng, this paper takes “multiplication formula” as an example, and conducts a comparative study on the example exercises of junior high school mathematics textbooks published by PEP and Zhejiang Education. The results show that under the same curriculum standard, the general trend of example exercises compilation in Zhejiang Education Edition textbooks and PEP textbooks is consistent, but in contrast, PEP textbooks will pay more attention to students’ mastery of basic knowledge, and at the same time set a certain proportion of challenge exercises to give students who have spare capacity to challenge themselves, and meet the individual needs of students with different abilities. The example exercises in Zhejiang Education Edition are more difficult to set, and are suitable for students with a better foundation. There are more advanced exercises on the basis of consolidating the foundation. Through the comparative study of junior high school mathematics exercises in PEP and Zhejiang Education Edition, I hope to provide beneficial enlightenment for junior high school mathematics teachers in our country when explaining “multiplication formula” and students when learning this part of the content.
文章引用:王明杨. 人教版与浙教版初中数学例习题的比较研究——以乘法公式为例[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(7): 1178-1186. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2024.1471291

参考文献

[1] Nohara, D. (2001) A Comparison of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the Third International Mathematics and Science Study Repeat (TIMSS-R), and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). NECS Working Paper, No. 2001-07.
[2] 鲍建生. 中英两国初中数学期望课程综合难度的比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2002, 31(9): 48-52.
[3] 王建磐, 鲍建生. 高中数学教材中例题的综合难度的国际比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2014, 43(8): 101-110.
[4] 吴立宝. 中澳数学教科书习题比较研究——以人教版和HMZ 8年级教科书为例[J]. 数学教育学报, 2013, 22(1): 1-4.
[5] 曹一鸣, 吴立宝. 初中数学教材难易程度的国际比较研究[J]. 数学教育学报, 2015, 24(4): 3-7.