5G背景下大数据知识管理能力对高新技术企业创新绩效的组态路径研究——基于fsQCA的实证分析
Research on the Configuration Path of Big Data Knowledge Management Capabilities on the Innovation Performance of High-Tech Technology Enterprises under the Background of 5G—Empirical Analysis Based on fsQCA
DOI: 10.12677/sd.2024.147210, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈康健, 袁建林:辽宁工业大学经济管理学院,辽宁 锦州
关键词: 5G知识管理fsQCA大数据创新绩效5G Knowledge Management fsQCA Big Data Innovation Performance
摘要: 数据处理技术的不断突破,改变了原有的生产、生活模式,使社会发展进入一个全新的境界。本文以东北、华北高新技术企业为切入点,研究知识管理能力对高新技术企业创新所带来的影响。采取问卷调查方法,取得172份调查问卷,完成高新技术企业知识管理能力对创新绩效影响调查,采用fsQCA方法,分析高新技术企业创新绩效的实现路径。为高新技术企业创新能力培育,突破知识管理能力的瓶颈,提供了有益的佐证。
Abstract: The continuous breakthroughs in data processing technology have changed the original production and life patterns, and social development has entered a new realm. This paper takes high-tech enterprises in Northeast and North China as the starting point to study the impact of knowledge management capabilities on the innovation of high-tech enterprises. A questionnaire survey method was adopted to obtain 172 questionnaires to complete the investigation of the impact of knowledge management capabilities of high-tech enterprises on innovation performance. The fsQCA method was used to analyze the implementation path of innovation performance of high-tech enterprises. It provides useful evidence for cultivating the innovation capabilities of high-tech enterprises and breaking through the bottleneck of knowledge management capabilities.
文章引用:陈康健, 袁建林. 5G背景下大数据知识管理能力对高新技术企业创新绩效的组态路径研究——基于fsQCA的实证分析[J]. 可持续发展, 2024, 14(7): 1823-1832. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2024.147210

参考文献

[1] Tanriverdi, H. (2005) Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms. MIS Quarterly, 29, 311-334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Gold, A.H., Malhotra, A. and Segars, A.H. (2001) Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 185-214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 秦璇. 员工绩效与知识管理能力的相关性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学, 2008.
[5] 俞兆渊, 鞠晓伟, 余海晴. 企业社会网络影响创新绩效的内在机理研究——打开知识管理能力的黑箱[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(12): 149-159.
[6] Sonenshein, S. (2014) How Organizations Foster the Creative Use of Resources. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 814-848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B. and Neale, M.A. (1999) Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 杰勒德∙德兰迪. 知识社会中的大学[M]. 黄建如, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2010.
[9] 万涛. 隐性知识转化为显性知识的评价判断规则研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015, 27(7): 66-75.
[10] Leenders, M.A.A.M. and Wierenga, B. (2002) The Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms for Integrating Marketing and R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 305-317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Doty, D.H. and Glick, W.H. (1998) Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? Organizational Research Methods, 1, 374-406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Adam, W.M., Aaron, M.W. and Christina, M.K. (2007) Assessing Common Methods Bias in Organizational Research. The 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York, 345-356.
[13] 黄芳铭. 结构方程模型理论与应用[M]. 台北: 五南书局, 2005.
[14] Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1988) On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Ragin, C.C. (2008) The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Oakland.
[16] 徐海宁. 动态知识管理能力模型及其效用研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 同济大学, 2008.
[17] Zhang, Y. and Li, H. (2009) Innovation Search of New Ventures in a Technology Cluster: The Role of Ties with Service Intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 88-109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 尤天慧, 李飞飞. 组织知识转移能力评价方法及提升策略[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2010(1): 121-124.
[19] Todorova, G. and Durisin, B. (2007) Absorptive Capacity: Valuing a Reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32, 774-786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Christensen, J.F. (1995) Asset Profiles for Technological Innovation. Research Policy, 24, 727-745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Lall, S. (1992) Technological Capabilities and Industrialization. World Development, 20, 165-186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Flatten, T.C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S.A. and Brettel, M. (2011) A Measure of Absorptive Capacity: Scale Development and Validation. European Management Journal, 29, 98-116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Zahra, S.A., Ireland, R.D. and Hitt, M.A. (2000) International Expansion by New Venture Firms: International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Technological Learning, and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 925-950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Kang, T., Maliphol, S., Kogler, D.F. and Kim, K. (2021) Regional Knowledge Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Activity, and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Italian NUTS-3 Regions. International Regional Science Review, 45, 293-320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Singh, J. (2005) Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns. Management Science, 51, 756-770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Audretsch, D.B., Bönte, W. and Keilbach, M. (2008) Entrepreneurship Capital and Its Impact on Knowledge Diffusion and Economic Performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 687-698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Lichtenthaler, U. (2008) Relative Capacity: Retaining Knowledge outside a Firm’s Boundaries. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 25, 200-212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Podsakoff, P.M. and Organ, D.W. (1986) Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] 徐广平, 张金山, 杜运周. 环境与组织因素组态效应对公司创业的影响——一项模糊集的定性比较分析[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020(1): 3-16.
[30] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.