以“感性确定性”观梁漱溟文化哲学方法论中的“现量”
Viewing “Pratyaksa” in Liang Shuming’s Cultural Philosophy by Sensuous-Certainty
DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2024.137242, PDF,   
作者: 路拓宇:中央民族大学哲学与宗教学学院,北京
关键词: 梁漱溟现量精神现象学黑格尔Liang Shuming Pratyaksa The Phenomenology of Spirit Hegel
摘要: 梁漱溟的文化哲学以唯识宗的“三量说”为基础,其中“现量”是唯识宗最为推崇的部分,梁漱溟在《唯识述义》中对其进行了讲解和批判。本文以黑格尔的《精神现象学》为基础以批判唯识宗的“现量”和梁漱溟对唯识宗的批判。本文同意梁漱溟对于“现量”的观点,但不同意其批判唯识宗的理由,认为其并未意识到“存在”的直接性和非谓词特性。
Abstract: Liang Shuming’s cultural philosophy is based on the “Three Quantities Theory” of the Vijnanavada, among which “pratyaksa” is the most respected part of the Vijnanavada, and Liang Shuming explained and criticized it in “The Meaning of Vijnaptimatra”. Based on Hegel’s The Phenomenology of Spirit, this paper criticizes the “pratyaksa” of Vijnanavada and Liang Shuming’s criticism of it. This paper agrees with Liang Shuming’s view of “pratyaksa”, but disagrees with his reasons for criticizing the Vijnanavada, and thinks that he does not realize the directness and non-predicative characteristics of “be”.
文章引用:路拓宇. 以“感性确定性”观梁漱溟文化哲学方法论中的“现量”[J]. 哲学进展, 2024, 13(7): 1621-1625. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2024.137242

参考文献

[1] 梁漱溟. 东西文化及其哲学[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2006.
[2] 黑格尔. 精神现象学[M]. 先刚, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2013: 10.
[3] 庞博阳, 陈清春. 论梁漱溟文化哲学中的三量说[J]. 五台山研究, 2021(4): 28-33.
[4] 陈永杰. 梁漱溟与唯识学[J]. 法音, 2014(7): 33-37.
[5] 梁漱溟. 梁漱溟全集(第一卷) [M]. 济南: 山东人民出版社, 2005: 5.
[6] 海德格尔. 黑格尔的精神现象学[M]. 英格特劳德∙古兰特, 编. 赵卫国, 译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2018: 3.