综合微创技术在足踝内翻矫形手术中的效果评估
Evaluation of the Effect of an Integrated Minimally Invasive Technique in Ankle Varus Surgery
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2024.1472170, PDF,   
作者: 石守印*:新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院,新疆 乌鲁木齐;周 敏#:新疆生产建设兵团医院,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 足踝矫形手术微创技术疗效评估安全性Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Surgery Minimally Invasive Technique Efficacy Evaluation Safety
摘要: 目的:本研究旨在评估综合微创技术在足踝矫形手术中的应用效果和安全性。方法:2022年1月至2023年12月,本研究收治足踝内翻畸形疾病患者20例,男12例,女8例;年龄10~71岁,平均45.8岁。左侧8例,右侧12例。患者均行内侧撑开踝上截骨术联合腓骨截骨,且采用接骨板固定截骨。结果:术后患者的恢复情况良好,大多数患者在I或II期实现伤口愈合,未发现严重并发症。平均随访期为14个月,患者的足踝功能有显著改善,疗效评估结果表明手术效果良好。结论:综合微创技术在足踝矫形手术中显示出良好的应用效果和安全性。
Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the application effect and safety of comprehensive minimally invasive techniques in foot and ankle orthopaedic surgery. Methods: From January 2022 to December 2023, 20 patients with foot and ankle varus malocclusion were treated in this study, including 12 males and 8 females; Age 10~71 years old, average age of 45.8 years, 8 patients on the left side and 12 patients on the right side underwent medial supra-malleolar osteotomy combined with fibula osteotomy, and osteotomy was fixed with bone plate. Results: The postoperative recovery of the patients was good, most of the patients achieved wound healing in stage I or II, and no serious complications were found on average. The follow-up period was 14 months, the patient’s foot and ankle function were significantly improved, and the efficacy evaluation results showed that the surgical effect was good. Conclusion: The comprehensive minimally invasive technique showed good application effect and safety in foot and ankle orthopaedic surgery.
文章引用:石守印, 周敏. 综合微创技术在足踝内翻矫形手术中的效果评估[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(7): 1478-1481. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.1472170

参考文献

[1] Hawson, S.T. (2011) Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation of the Foot and Ankle in the Athlete. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, 28, 597-609.
[2] Li, J., Shen, X., Shao, J., Ze, R., Rai, S., Hong, P., et al. (2020) How to Manage Pediatric Orthopaedic Patients. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 102, e86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Li, B.Y. and Webster, T.J. (2018) Bacteria Antibiotic Resistance: New Challenges and Opportunities for Implant-Associated Orthopedic Infections. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 36, 1-12.
[4] Barg, A., Pagenstert, G., Leumann, A. and Valderrabano, V. (2013) Knöchelosteotomie—Die Osteotomie als Zugang. Der Orthopäde, 42, 309-321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Takakura, Y., Takaoka, T., Tanaka, Y., Yajima, H. and Tamai, S. (1998) Results of Opening-Wedge Osteotomy for the Treatment of a Post-Traumatic Varus Deformity of the Ankle. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume), 80, 213-218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Hintermann, B., Knupp, M. and Barg, A. (2016) Supramalleolar Osteotomies for the Treatment of Ankle Arthritis. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 24, 424-432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Peterson, J.R., et al. (2019) The Use of Bone Grafts, Bone Graft Substitutes, and Orthobiologics for Osseous Healing in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, 3, 1-7.
[8] Wendler, D., Shofoluwe, A. and Bailey, S.E.J. (2023) The Mini Bone Extra-Articular Reconstruction System for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity—Surgical Technique with Cadaveric Quantification of Surrounding Anatomy. Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery, 22, 185-193.