儿童青少年攻击性行为干预效果的元分析

A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Intervention on Aggressive Behavior in Children and Adolescents

摘要: 目的：采用元分析方法梳理儿童青少年攻击性行为的干预效果及影响因素，以期为有效干预攻击性行为提供参考依据。方法：检索知网、万方等数据库所收录的有关儿童青少年攻击性行为干预效果的文献，采用Review Manager 5.3软件进行元分析。结果：本研究共纳入23篇文献，总效应量d = −1.19，95% CI (−1.49, −0.90)；针对儿童青少年攻击性行为的干预方式大多数是社会技能训练(d = −0.89)，其次是综合干预(d = −4.21)和艺术类干预(d = −1.69)；进一步分析发现，干预效果受干预总时长、单次干预时间、干预次数、干预对象学习阶段和干预被试组织方式等因素的影响。结论：儿童青少年攻击性行为的干预措施总体有效，其中综合干预、适当时长(8~12周)、较长单次干预时间(超过90分钟)、干预次数较少(低于8次)、针对低年龄层学生的干预和家庭干预的效果尤为显著。

Abstract: To explore the intervention effect and influencing factors of aggressive behavior in children and adolescents by meta-analysis, so as to provide reference for effective intervention of aggressive behavior. Pieces of literature on the intervention effect of aggressive behavior in children and adolescents were retrieved from CNKI, Wanfang and other databases. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software. A total of 23 articles were included in this study, with a total effect size of d = −1.19, 95% CI (−1.49, −0.90). Most of the interventions for children and adolescents’ aggressive behavior were social skills training (d = −0.89), followed by comprehensive intervention (d = −4.21) and art intervention (d = −1.69). Further analysis found that the intervention effect was affected by factors such as the total duration of intervention, the time of a single intervention, the number of interventions, the learning stage of the intervention subjects, and the organization of the intervention subjects. The intervention measures for children and adolescents’ aggressive behavior are generally effective. Among them, comprehensive intervention, appropriate duration (8~12 weeks), longer single intervention time (more than 90 minutes), fewer interventions (less than 8 times), intervention for low-age students and family intervention are particularly effective.