我国规制电商平台滥用“相对优势地位”的困境
The Dilemma of Regulating the Abuse of “Relatively Dominative Position” on E-Commerce Platforms in China
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.133619, PDF,   
作者: 陈丞锐:浙江理工大学法政学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 电商平台相对优势地位困境E-Commerce Platforms Relatively Dominative Position Dilemma
摘要: 我国《反不正当竞争法》的第三次修订再次引发了关于“相对优势地位”条款的讨论,电商平台作为该条款欲规制的重点对象,也受到较多关注。事实上,我国当前并不具备引入专门条款规制电商平台滥用“相对优势地位”行为的条件。立法上,不论是《反垄断法》、《反不正当竞争法》还是《电子商务法》,都难以与该条款合理融合;实践中,则存在成本高而收益小、规制必要性不足、条款本身概念不明晰的适用困境。对此,立法上,应以《电子商务法》第35条为基础进行针对性立法完善;实践中,要建立多元化的规制体系,改善竞争环境。
Abstract: The third revision of China’s Anti Unfair Competition Law has once again sparked discussions on the “relatively dominative position” clause, and e-commerce platforms, as the key object of regulation in this clause, have also received more attention. In fact, China currently does not have the conditions to introduce specialized clauses to regulate the abuse of “relatively dominative position” by e-commerce platforms. In terms of legislation, whether it is the Anti Monopoly Law, the Anti Unfair Competition Law, or the E-Commerce Law, it is difficult to reasonably integrate with this provision. In practice, there are difficulties in the application of high costs but low benefits, insufficient regulatory necessity, and unclear concepts of the terms themselves. In terms of legislation, targeted legislative improvements should be made based on Article 35 of the Electronic Commerce Law. In practice, it is necessary to establish a diversified regulatory system and improve the competitive environment.
文章引用:陈丞锐. 我国规制电商平台滥用“相对优势地位”的困境[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(3): 5044-5050. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.133619

参考文献

[1] 陈丹舟. 相对优势地位理论基础研究[J]. 竞争政策研究, 2016(3): 19-31.
[2] 王亚南. 经营者相对优势地位的反垄断法规制[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2011(2): 122-127.
[3] 剌森. 互联网平台滥用相对优势地位的规制理论与制度构成[J]. 环球法律评论, 2023, 45(1): 156-173.
[4] 王晓晔. 论滥用“相对优势地位”的法律规制[J]. 现代法学, 2016, 38(5): 79-92.
[5] 王琲琲. 竞争法规制下滥用市场相对优势地位的理性思考[J]. 中国商论, 2022(3): 36-39.
[6] 许光耀. “相对优势地位”与“市场支配地位”的法理辨析——对《反不正当竞争法(征求意见稿)》第6条的不同阐释[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2016(5): 43-45.
[7] 刘大洪, 段宏磊. 谦抑性视野中经济法理论体系的重构[J]. 法商研究, 2014, 31(6): 45-54.
[8] 张占江. 论反不正当竞争法的谦抑性[J]. 法学, 2019(3): 45-59.
[9] 郭骁. 电商平台滥用相对优势地位规制的检讨与修正——基于《电子商务法》第35条的分析[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2022(6): 73-79.
[10] 陈永伟. 滥用相对优势地位的经济学分析[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2023(2): 49-53.
[11] 袁康, 刘汉广. 平台内经营者权益保护的法律困境与破解——回归相对优势地位理论的视角[J]. 学习与探索, 2022(10): 80-89.
[12] 朱理. 滥用相对优势地位问题的法律规制——虚幻的敌人与真实的危险[J]. 电子知识产权, 2016(6): 31-39.
[13] 孙良国, 赵梓晴. 效率违约理论的价值冲突[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(5): 79-89.
[14] 戴龙. 关于《电子商务法》对滥用优势地位规制的适用研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2019(2): 28-32.
[15] 赵雪. 电商平台滥用相对优势地位行为的法律规制[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报, 2021, 12(6): 101-105.