运动式治理与常规治理：关系机制及融合路径

Campaign Governance and Conventional Governance: Relationship Mechanism and Integration Path

摘要: 运动式治理与常规治理是两种不同的政府治理工具。从“运动”到“治理”，对于运动式治理关注焦点的变化使得二者的关系逐渐从对立走向共生、融合，二者在工具属性上的互补性逐渐明晰，形成了贴合中国治理实际、富有中国治理特色的运动式治理常规化和科层运动化的融合路径。运动式治理常规化机制旨在通过专业化、制度化、常态化的科层再造以建立政策执行的长效机制对治理成果加以维续；科层运动化机制旨在运用运动式治理工具实现常规任务，将常规任务“嵌入”到运动式治理中以增强治理效能。二者融合路径的探索关键在于如何将两种不同的治理工具混合运用以实现治理效能的最大化。因此，只有不断提高政府治理工具混合运用技术与制度安排技术，将二者调试至最佳的协同状态，才能真正实现政府治理能力的现代化。

Abstract: Campaign governance and conventional governance are two different government governance tools. From “movement” to “governance”, the change in the focus of the movement governance makes the relationship between the two gradually from opposition to symbiosis and integration, and the complementarity of the two in the instrumental attributes is gradually clear, forming the integration mechanism of the routine and bureaucratic movement of the movement governance that fits the reality of Chinese governance and is rich in Chinese governance characteristics. The regularization mechanism of movement governance aims to establish a long-term mechanism of policy implementation to maintain the governance results through professional, institutionalized and normalized hierarchical reengineering. The movement mechanism of bureaucracies aims to use the tools of movement governance to realize routine tasks and “embed” routine tasks into movement governance to enhance governance efficiency. The key to explore the mechanism of their integration lies in how to use the two different governance tools to achieve the maximum governance efficiency. Therefore, only by continuously improving the technology of mixed application of government governance tools and institutional arrangement, and debugging them to the best collaborative state, can we truly realize the modernization of government governance ability.