论上市公司“忽悠式”股份回购的法律规制
On the Legal Regulation of the “Fraudulent” Share Repurchase of Listed Companies
摘要: 2023年修订的《公司法》延续了此前的股份回购规定,较为宽松的回购条件旨在激活上市公司的股份回购功能,但实践中“忽悠式”股份回购频发,回购计划仅仅停留在“纸面功夫”,不仅损害了投资者、中小股东等多方主体的利益,还降低了股份回购方案的可信度,导致市场反应下降。股份回购决议程序不严格、信息披露机制落实不到位以及“忽悠式”股份回购的责任与救济不明,三者共同构成这一问题的法律成因。基于此,建议弥补上市公司股份回购决议中的疏漏,并通过细化回购信息披露的阶段性内容和发挥第三方在信息披露中的作用来规范相关义务主体的信息披露义务,并完善“忽悠式”股份回购的责任追究机制。
Abstract: The Company Law amended in 2023 continues the previous share repurchase provisions, and the relatively loose repurchase conditions aim to activate the share repurchase function of listed companies. However, in practice, “flickering” share repurchases are frequent, and repurchase plans only stay on paper. This not only harms the interests of investors and small- and medium-sized shareholders, but also reduces the credibility of share repurchase plans, leading to a decrease in market reaction. The share repurchase resolution procedure is not strict, the information disclosure mechanism is not in place, and the responsibility and relief of "fraudulent" share repurchase are unclear, which all constitute the legal cause of this problem. Based on this, it is recommended to make up for the omissions in the resolution on share repurchase of listed companies, and standardize the information disclosure obligations of relevant obligation subjects by refining the phased content of repurchase information disclosure and leveraging the role of third parties in information disclosure, and improve the accountability mechanism for "fraudulent" share repurchase.
文章引用:闻洪丽. 论上市公司“忽悠式”股份回购的法律规制[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(8): 22-28. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2024.108348

参考文献

[1] 许可. 股东会与董事会分权制度研究[J]. 中国法学, 2017(2): 126-145.
[2] 莫志. 中国上市公司股份回购规则的结构主义检视[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2022(5): 220-233.
[3] 张微微. 中国上市公司信息披露效应研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2016.
[4] 杨海静. 单方允诺视角下的证券市场公开承诺[J]. 南方金融, 2018(7): 92-102.
[5] 李晓春. 公司违法买回自己股份的效力认定及法律责任[J]. 政治与法律, 2015(8): 96-103.
[6] 刘俊海. 上市公司股份回购方案的法律性质与规制策略——民法、公司法与证券法的三重维度[J]. 当代法学, 2022, 36(5): 14-28.
[7] 刘俊海. 论公司生存权和发展权原则——兼议《公司法》修改[J]. 清华法学, 2022, 16(2): 6-22.