二次创作之合理使用边界认定
Fair Use Boundary Identification of Secondary Creation
摘要: 近年来,二次创作激增,常引发版权纠纷,而合理使用判定主要有“三步检验法”和“四要素检验法”,我国采用前者,但需融合后者元素;笔者建议细化使用目的和性质的判定,定义“转换性”使用的界限,识别更有利于合理使用的作品类型,以及制定引用比例计算方法,由此本文旨在为我国著作权法的合理使用条款提供改进建议。
Abstract: In recent years, the proliferation of secondary creations often leads to copyright disputes, and reasonable use judgment mainly are the “three-step test” and “four-factor test”, our country uses the former, but need to integrate the latter element; The author proposes to refine the judgment of the purpose and nature of use, to define the boundaries of “transformational” use, to identify the types of works that are more conducive to fair use, and to formulate a method for calculating the proportion of citations. Therefore, this paper aims to provide some suggestions for improving the fair use clause of copyright law in our country.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
熊琦. “视频搬运”现象的著作权法应对[J]. 知识产权, 2021(7): 39-49.
|
|
[2]
|
孙玉荣, 李贤. 同人作品著作权合理使用问题探析[J]. 科技与法律, 2020(6): 1-8.
|
|
[3]
|
刘晓春, 李鸣宇. 短视频版权保护中的合理使用分析——美国判例的启发[J]. 中国对外贸易, 2021(9): 36-38.
|
|
[4]
|
Kwok, K.H.F. (2015) Google Book Search, Transformative Use, and Commercial Intermediation: An Economic Perspective. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 17, 283-318.
|
|
[5]
|
李蔷, 魏伟. 合理使用视阈下的互联网混剪视频保护困境及出路[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2019, 21(5): 96-105.
|
|
[6]
|
曾琳. 著作权法第三次休整下的“限制与例外”制度应用研究[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2016: 14.
|