伽达默尔的诠释学方法与康德的认识论:主观性与客观性之间的平衡
Gadamer’s Hermeneutic Approach and Kant’s Epistemology: The Balance between Subjectivity and Objectivity
摘要: 本论文旨在探讨德国哲学家伽达默尔的诠释学方法与康德的认识论之间的关系,特别关注主观性与客观性之间的平衡。伽达默尔的诠释学方法强调对历史性意识和理解的重视,而康德的认识论则关注主观性与客观性的关系。通过比较两者的观点,本文试图深入理解伽达默尔如何在诠释学方法中处理主观性和客观性之间的平衡,以及与康德认识论的异同点,并探讨它们在伦理维度上的意义。
Abstract: This paper aims to explore the relationship between the hermeneutic approach of German philosopher Gadamer and Kant’s epistemology, with a particular focus on the balance between subjectivity and objectivity. Gadamer’s hermeneutic approach emphasizes the importance of historical consciousness and understanding, while Kant’s epistemology focuses on the relationship between subjectivity and objectivity. By comparing the perspectives of both, this article attempts to gain a deeper understanding of how Gadamer balances subjectivity and objectivity in his hermeneutic approach, as well as the similarities and differences with Kant’s epistemology, and explores their ethical significance.
文章引用:朱云丹. 伽达默尔的诠释学方法与康德的认识论:主观性与客观性之间的平衡[J]. 哲学进展, 2024, 13(8): 1872-1878. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2024.138281

参考文献

[1] 格奥尔格∙伽达默尔. 真理与方法[M]. 洪汉鼎, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2004.
[2] 理查德∙E.帕尔默. 诠释学[M]. 潘德荣, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014.
[3] (德)康德. 纯粹理性批判[M]. 邓晓芒, 译. 杨祖陶, 校. 北京: 人民出版社, 2004.
[4] 康德, 著. 任何一种能够作为科学出现的未来形而上学导论[M]. 庞景仁, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1978.