意定监护协议的生效条件研究
Study on the Conditions for the Entry into Force of the Intended Guardianship Agreement
DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.128720, PDF,   
作者: 郭 慧:新疆大学法学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 意定监护生效条件行为能力Voluntary Guardianship Effective Conditions Capacity
摘要: 本文围绕意定监护协议的生效条件展开研究。意定监护制度在我国实施有段时间,尽管司法解释对其规定进行补充,但该制度的内容还比较粗略,在实践过程中出现生效条件不明确、行为能力认定标准机械、法定监护与意定监护衔接不明、行为能力宣告程序成障碍等问题。通过对域外实践的有益探索,可以总结出一些可供借鉴的宝贵经验。针对实践需求与发展趋势,我们应允许当事人约定协议的生效条件、实现行为能力认定与意定监护的“软脱钩”、合理构建意定监护与法定监护的过渡机制、优化行为能力宣告模式等,逐步化解意定监护协议生效过程中的难点与问题,构建一套完善的意定监护法律体系与配套机制,有效服务于人口多元化、个性化的养老新需求。
Abstract: This paper examines the conditions for the entry into force of an intended guardianship agreement. The system of intended guardianship has been implemented in China for a period of time, and although the judicial interpretation supplements its provisions, the content of the system is still relatively sketchy, and in the course of practice, there are problems such as unclear conditions for taking effect, mechanical standards for determining capacity, unclear connection between legal guardianship and voluntary guardianship, and obstacles to the procedures for declaring capacity. Through the useful exploration of extraterritorial practice, some valuable experiences can be summarized for reference. In view of the practical needs and development trends, we should allow the parties to agree on the effective conditions of the agreement, realize the “soft decoupling” between the determination of legal capacity and the intended guardianship, reasonably construct the transition mechanism between the voluntary guardianship and the legal guardianship, and optimize the mode of declaration of legal capacity, so as to gradually resolve the difficulties and problems in the process of the effective date of the intended guardianship agreement, and build a complete legal system and supporting mechanism for the voluntary guardianship, so as to effectively serve the new needs of the diversified and personalized elderly care population.
文章引用:郭慧. 意定监护协议的生效条件研究[J]. 法学, 2024, 12(8): 5049-5057. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2024.128720

参考文献

[1] 方勇男, 张璐. 我国成年监护制度之探讨与展望[J]. 延边大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 52(2): 91-98, 142-143.
[2] 冯浩, 朴宇芊. 我国现行成年监护制度的反思与完善——兼评《民法总则》成年意定监护相关条款[J]. 长沙大学学报, 2019, 33(1): 66-69.
[3] 郑晓剑. 后民法典时代意定监护制度的体系化建构[J]. 法学, 2024(5): 113-128.
[4] 刘征峰. 意定监护中的基础关系与授权关系[J]. 法商研究, 2022, 39(5): 187-200.
[5] 李霞. 成年监护制度的现代转向[J]. 中国法学, 2015(2): 199-219.
[6] 李国强. 成年意定监护法律关系的解释——以《民法总则》第33条为解释对象[J]. 现代法学, 2018, 40(5): 182-193.
[7] 张海燕, 苏捷. 老年人意定监护制度的域外考察与本土借鉴[J]. 国外社会科学, 2022(6): 87-99, 197-198.
[8] 鲁晓明. 《民法典》实施背景下意定监护功能异化之矫正[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2023(1): 69-80.
[9] 米婷. 实务中的意定监护问题及其改进[J]. 人民论坛∙学术前沿, 2020(20): 132-135.
[10] 杨立新. 民法总则重大疑难问题研究[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2011.
[11] 李欣. 意定监护的中国实践与制度完善[J]. 现代法学, 2021, 43(2): 31-43.
[12] 张素华. 意定监护制度实施中的困境与破解[J]. 东方法学, 2020(2): 121-130.
[13] 李霞. 成年监护制度研究: 以人权为视角[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2012: 255.
[14] 王竹青. 成年人监护中行为能力认定域外考察[J]. 法律适用, 2017(11): 115-120.
[15] 董思远. 协助决定范式下意定监护制度改革新径路[J]. 河北法学, 2022, 40(3): 112-133.
[16] 陈璐瑶. 发展中的上海意定监护公证[J]. 中国公证, 2020(12): 17-22.
[17] 中国公证协会业务规则委员会. 关于进一步加强和规范意定监护类公证业务发展的报告[J]. 中国公证, 2021(11): 22-25, 1.
[18] 周素英, 林俐. 《民法典》视域下意定监护启动条件研究[J]. 绥化学院学报, 2023, 43(8): 29-32.