认知负荷影响跨期决策的图形框架效应机制
Mechanism of Graphical Framing Effects on Intertemporal Decision-Making Influenced by Cognitive Load
摘要: 大学生存在跨期决策近期偏好,容易产生超前消费行为。本文采用经典选择任务范式,探讨图形框架如何助推大学生跨期决策,并进一步探讨认知负荷对框架效应的影响机制。结果发现:1) 图形框架有效助推跨期决策。突出时间时,大学生倾向于即时满足;突出金钱时,倾向于延迟满足。2) 认知负荷不直接影响框架效应,高、低认知负荷的大学生均表现出显著的图形框架效应。3) 认知负荷通过削弱分析系统影响框架效应。使用分析系统进行信息加工时,低认知负荷的大学生倾向于延迟满足,高认知负荷的大学生使用启发式策略,其决策受图形框架影响。结论:图形框架可以有效助推跨期决策,且繁杂信息一般不会对其产生影响,与双加工理论的默认干预模型一致。
Abstract: College students exhibit a preference for near-term outcomes in intertemporal decision-making, which often leads to impulsive consumption behavior. Employing the classical choice task paradigm, commonly used in psychology, we explore how graphical frames influence college students’ intertemporal decision-making and further delve into the mechanism by which cognitive load affects the framework effect. Our findings reveal: 1) Graphical frames effectively influence intertemporal choices. When time is emphasized, students tend towards immediate gratification; conversely, when money is highlighted, they prefer delayed gratification. 2) Both high and low cognitive load college students exhibit significant graphical frame effects. 3) Cognitive load influences the framework effect by weakening the analytical system. Specifically, when using the analytical system to process information, college students with low cognitive load tend to delay gratification, whereas those with high cognitive load rely on heuristic strategies, and their decisions are influenced by the graphical frames. In conclusion, graphical frames can effectively facilitate intertemporal decision-making, and complex information generally does not detract from this effect, which is consistent with the default intervention model of dual processing theory.
文章引用:张蓝静 (2024). 认知负荷影响跨期决策的图形框架效应机制. 心理学进展, 14(8), 584-592. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.148585

参考文献

[1] 毕翠华, 齐怀远(2022). 时间感知在跨期决策中的作用——时间决策模型的新探索. 心理科学进展, 30(5), 1106-1118.
[2] 邴纪峰, 戴良铁(2012). 基于认知负荷理论的框架效应分析. 中国城市经济, (1), 148, 150.
[3] 车敬上, 孙海龙, 肖晨洁, 李爱梅(2019). 为什么信息超载损害决策? 基于有限认知资源解释. 心理科学进展, 27(10), 1758-1768.
[4] 陈凤琦, 毛伟宾(2014). 时间压力对品牌决策中图形框架效应的影响. 应用心理学, 20(4), 332-338.
[5] 何贵兵, 李纾, 梁竹苑(2018). 以小拨大: 行为决策助推社会发展. 心理学报, 50(8), 801-803.
[6] 贺汝婉, 李斌, 张淑颖, 崔馨月, 雷励(2021). 时间与金钱概念对消费者购买决策的不同影响及其心理机制. 理科学进展, 29(9), 1684-1695.
[7] 李爱梅, 车敬上, 刘楠, 孙海龙, 周玮(2021). 海量信息如何影响跨期决策? 基于注意资源的理论视角. 心理科学进展, 29(9), 1521-1533.
[8] 刘扬, 孙彦(2014). 行为决策中框架效应研究新思路——从风险决策到跨期决策, 从言语框架到图形框架. 心理科学进展, 22(8), 1205-1217.
[9] 孙彦, 黄莉, 刘扬(2012). 决策中的图形框架效应. 心理科学进展, 20(11), 1718-1726.
[10] 张书维, 梁歆佚, 岳经纶(2019). 行为社会政策: “助推”公共福利的实践与探索. 心理科学进展, 27(3), 428-437.
[11] 周晶, 张加峰, 李智勇, 李晶(2020). 得失情境下的图形框架对跨期选择倾向的影响. 心理学探新, 40(2), 164-168.
[12] Bellini-Leite, S. C. (2022). Dual Process Theory: Embodied and Predictive; Symbolic and Classical. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article ID: 805386.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Chen, O., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2018). Extending Cognitive Load Theory to Incorporate Working Memory Resource Depletion: Evidence from the Spacing Effect. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 483-501.[CrossRef
[14] De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human Brain. Science, 313, 684-687.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Elqayam, S. (2009). Models of Dependence and Independence: A Two-Dimensional Architecture of Dual Processing. Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 377-387.[CrossRef
[16] Ferreira, M. B., Garcia-Marques, L., Sherman, S. J., & Sherman, J. W. (2006). Automatic and Controlled Components of Judgment and Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 797-813.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401.[CrossRef
[18] Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A Discounting Framework for Choice with Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769-792.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Hinson, J. M., Whitney, P., Wilson, C. G., & Nusbaum, A. T. (2019). Working Memory Loads Differentially Influence Frame-Induced Bias and Normative Choice in Risky Decision Making. PLOS ONE, 14, e0214571.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Kim, D., & Jang, S. (2017). Stress and Food Choices: Examining Gender Differences and the Time Horizon Framing Effect. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 67, 134-142.[CrossRef
[21] Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. H. (1989). Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 181-193.[CrossRef
[22] Lu, L., Yang, J., Shu, R., & Long, C. (2023). The Default‐Interventionist Model Underlies Premise Typicality Weakening the Premise Diversity Effect during Category‐Based Induction: Event‐Related Potentials Evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 64, 325-338.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Mayer, V. F., Santos, G. E. d. O., & Marques, O. R. B. (2022). Option Framing for Upselling Tourism Services: Does Cognitive Availability Prevent Irrational Choices? Tourism Economics, 28, 476-494.[CrossRef
[24] Rao, L., & Li, S. (2011). New Paradoxes in Intertemporal Choice. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 122-129.[CrossRef
[25] Silvi, M., & Padilla Rosa, E. (2021). Reversing Impatience: Framing Mechanisms to Increase the Purchase of Energy-Saving Appliances. Energy Economics, 103, Article ID: 105563.[CrossRef
[26] Swan, A. B., Calvillo, D. P., & Revlin, R. (2018). To Detect or Not to Detect: A Replication and Extension of the Three-Stage Model. Acta Psychologica, 187, 54-65.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Trippas, D., Thompson, V. A., & Handley, S. J. (2017). When Fast Logic Meets Slow Belief: Evidence for a Parallel-Processing Model of Belief Bias. Memory & Cognition, 45, 539-552.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-Process Theory and Signal-Detection Theory of Recognition Memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152-176.[CrossRef] [PubMed]