变化环境下超定量与年最大值洪水序列频率分析模型对比研究
Comparative Study between POT and AMS Flood Frequency Analysis Models under Changing Environment
DOI: 10.12677/JWRR.2013.21008, PDF, HTML,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 张丽娟*, 叶长青*：中山大学水资源与环境研究中心；陈晓宏*, 张家鸣：华南地区水循环与水安全广东省普通高校重点实验室
关键词: 超定量；洪水频率；广义Pareto；门限值；P-Ⅲ分布；Peak-over-Threshold; Flood Frequency; Generalized Pareto; Threshold; P-III Distribution
摘要: POT模型比AMS模型能更完整灵活地描述洪水及其产生过程，适用于变化情况下的洪水频率分析。本文以武江流域犁市(二)站为例进行超定量(POT)与年最大值(AMS)洪水频率对比分析。应用门限值选取标准确定门限值，根据POT模型分布参数及设计洪水估计结果随门限值变化情况验证所选门限值的合理性；以泊松分布为超定量发生次数分布，用广义Pareto(GP)分布拟合POT样本。对比POT模型和基于P-III分布的AMS模型，探讨大重现期洪水频发是否受频率分析方法不当影响。结果表明：根据门限值选取标准确定的门限值，经验证能够保证POT模型的稳定性以及样本独立性；估计大重现期设计洪峰时，P-Ⅲ分布的AMS模型的估计结果小于GP分布的POT模型，100年一遇洪水估计结果差异度大于6%，可见AMS模型存在低估大重现期设计洪峰的现象，这是近年来计算出大重现期洪水频发的原因之一。
Abstract: Taking the daily average discharge of Lishi (2) station in the Wujiang river basin for an example, two flood frequency analysis models, respectively based on peaks-over-threshold (POT) and annual maximum series (AMS), are compared. POT model has better flexibility describing floods and the flood generating process than AMS model; thus is suitable for flood frequency analysis under changing environment. Threshold selection approaches are applied to choose the threshold value, which is tested by the relationship of estimated results of parameters of the POT model and designed floods with changing thresholds afterwards. The POT samples are fitted by the generalized Pareto (GP) distribution with a Poisson model for arrival. Compare POT model based on the GP distribution and AMS model based on the P-III distribution and discuss whether the frequent occurrence of large return period flood is influenced by undue frequency analysis method(the large return period flood-prone by the undue influenced of the frequency analysis). The results show that, threshold selected by combined approaches is able to ensure the sample independence and stability of the POT model. When estimating the designed flood peak of large return period, result estimated by the AMS model based on P-III distribution is smaller than the POT model based on GP distribution, the 100-year flood is estimated that the results of differences greater than 6%, visible AMS model underestimate of the phenomenon of large return period designed flood peak, which is one of the reasons of the frequent occurrence of large return period floods in recent years.
文章引用：张丽娟, 陈晓宏, 叶长青, 张家鸣. 变化环境下超定量与年最大值洪水序列频率分析模型对比研究[J]. 水资源研究, 2013, 2(1): 51-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2013.21008

参考文献

[1] 王善序. 洪水超定量系列频率分析[J]. 人民长江, 1999, 30(8): 23-25. Wang Shanxu. The flood frequency analysis based on POT flood series. Yangtze River, 1999, 30(8): 23-25. (in Chinese)
[2] 方彬, 郭生练, 柴晓玲, 等. FPOT方法在洪水频率分析中的应用研究[J]. 水力发电, 2005, 31(2): 9-12. Fang Bin, Guo Shenglian, Chai Xiaoling, et al. Flood frequency analysis based on FPOT method. Water Power, 2005, 31(2): 9- 12. (in Chinese)
[3] BEGUERIA, S. Uncertainties in partial duration series model- ling of extremes related to the choice of the threshold value. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 303(1-4): 215-230.
[4] 戴昌军, 梁忠民, 栾承梅, 等. 洪水频率分析中PDS模型研究进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2006, 17(1): 136-140. Dai Changjun, Liang Zhongmin, Luan Chengmei, et al. Advance in flood frequency analysis for partial duration series. Advances in Water Science, 2006, 17(1): 136-140. (in Chinese)
[5] LANG, M., OUARDAB, T. B. M. J. and BOBEE B. Towards operational guidelines for over-threshold modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 1999, 255: 103-117.
[6] CUNNANE, C. A note on the Poisson assumption in partial dura- tion series models. Water Resource Research, 1979, 15(2): 489- 494.
[7] ROSBJERG, D., MADSEN, H. and RASMUSSEN, P. F. Predic- tion in partial duration series with generalized Pareto distributed exceedances. Water Resource Research, 1992, 28: 3001-3010.
[8] 王剑峰, 宋松柏. 广义Pareto分布在超定量洪水序列频率分析中的应用[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(2): 191-196. Wang Jianfeng, Song Songbai. Application of generalized Pareto distribution in POT flood series frequency analysis. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Nature Science Edition), 2010, 38(2): 191-196. (in Chinese)
[9] 周川, 陈元芳, 魏琳, 等. 适线法在洪水超定量系列频率分析中的应用研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2011, 29(3): 48-50. Zhou Chuan, Chen Yuanfang, Wei Lin, et al. Application of fit- ting-curve method to frequency analysis of POT flood series. Water Resources and Power, 2011, 29(3): 48-50. (in Chinese)
[10] ASHKAR, F., ROUSSELLE, J. Partial duration series modeling under the assumption of a Poissonian flood count. Journal of Hydrology, 1987, 90: 135-144.
[11] ONOZ, B., BAYAZIT, M. Effect of the occurrence process of the peaks over threshold on the flood estimates. Journal of Hy drology, 2001, 244: 86-96.
[12] 王剑峰. 洪水超定量序列频率分析计算[D]. 西北农林科技大学, 2010: 5. Wang Jianfeng. Frequency analysis and calculation for the peak over threshold flood series. Northwest A&F University, 2010: 5. (in Chinese)
[13] 董爱红. 广义Pareto分布及其在水文频率分析中的应用[D]. 河海大学, 2005: 3. Dong Aihong. Study on generalized Pareto distribution and its application on frequency analysis of hydrology. Hohai Univer- sity, 2005: 3. (in Chinese)
[14] CUNNANE, C. A particular comparison of annual maxima and partial duration series methods of flood frequency prediction. Journal of Hydrology, 1973, 18(2): 257-271.
[15] MADSEN, H., ROSBJERG, D. Generalized least squares and empirical Bayes estimation in regional partial duration series in- dex-flood modeling. Water Resource Research, 1997, 33(4): 771- 781.
[16] HOSKING, J. R. M., WALLIS, J. R.. Regional frequency analy- sis: An approach based on L-moments. London: Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1997: 194.
[17] ROSBJERG, D. Estimation in partial duration series with inde- pendent and dependent peak values. Journal of Hydrology, 1985, 76(1): 183-195.
[18] 王文圣, 张翔, 金菊良, 等. 水文学不确定性分析方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 20-23. Wang Wensheng, Zhang Xiang, Jin Juliang, et al. Methods of uncertainty analysis for hydrology. Beijing: Science Press, 2011: 20-23.