基于地形起伏度的临沧市人居环境地形适宜性分析
Analysis of Terrain Suitability of Living Environment in Lincang City Based on Terrain Fluctuation
DOI: 10.12677/gser.2024.134073, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张志梅*, 田 秀, 段正洋#:楚雄师范学院资源环境与化学学院,云南 楚雄
关键词: 人居环境地形适宜性地形起伏度临沧市Living Environment Terrain Suitability Terrain Undulation Lincang City
摘要: 随着社会和经济的不断发展,人们对生活环境越来越重视,而人居环境是人类生存与发展的基础,并从根本上制约着区域人口的集聚水平和分布格局。本文选取地形起伏度对临沧市人居环境地形适宜性进行分析。利用ArcGIS 10.2软件,通过均值变点分析法,确定最佳分析窗口大小为0.2025 km2,在此基础上计算地形起伏度,对各乡镇地形起伏度进行区域内部差异分析。运用SPSS软件,对各乡镇的平均人口密度与地形起伏度进行了相关分析和回归分析,相关分析中R2为−0.505,发现二者之间存在显著负相关关系,回归分析中符合逆曲线模型,其R2为0.859。根据地形起伏度将人居环境地形适宜性分为5个级别,高度适宜区地形起伏度值 < 1.5,占比达41.19%;中度适宜区地形起伏度值位于1.5~2.0,占比达36.34%;低度适宜区地形起伏度值位于2.0~2.5,占比达19.28%;临界适宜区地形起伏度值位于2.5~3.0,占比达3.03%;不适宜区地形起伏度值 ≥ 3.0,占比达0.16%。经分析得出临沧市人口主要分布在相对平坦的坝区。本研究能够为临沧市人口合理布局和社会经济发展提供借鉴。
Abstract: With the continuous development of society and economy, people are paying more and more attention to the living environment. The living environment is the foundation of human survival and development, and fundamentally restricts the concentration level and distribution pattern of regional population. This article selects terrain undulation to analyze the terrain suitability of the living environment in Lincang City. Using ArcGIS 10.2 software and the mean change point analysis method, the optimal analysis window size was determined to be 0.2025 km2. Based on this, terrain undulation was calculated, and regional differences in terrain undulation were analyzed for each township. Using SPSS software, correlation and regression analysis were conducted on the average population density and terrain undulation of each township. The R2 value in the correlation analysis was −0.505, and a significant negative correlation was found between the two. The regression analysis followed the inverse curve model, with an R2 value of 0.859. According to the terrain undulation, the suitability of living environment terrain is divided into 5 levels. The terrain undulation value of the height suitable area is less than 1.5, accounting for 41.19%; The terrain undulation value in the moderately suitable area is between 1.5 and 2.0, accounting for 36.34%; The terrain undulation value in the low degree suitable area is between 2.0 and 2.5, accounting for 19.28%; The terrain undulation value of the critical suitable area is between 2.5 and 3.0, accounting for 3.03%; The terrain undulation value in the unsuitable area is ≥ 3.0, accounting for 0.16%. Analysis shows that the population of Lincang City is mainly distributed in relatively flat dam areas. This study can provide reference for the rational population layout and socio-economic development of Lincang City.
文章引用:张志梅, 田秀, 段正洋. 基于地形起伏度的临沧市人居环境地形适宜性分析[J]. 地理科学研究, 2024, 13(4): 759-770. https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2024.134073

参考文献

[1] 邓诗韵, 何云晓, 何贝贝. 基于GIS的绵阳市地形起伏度与人口、经济的关系[J]. 绵阳师范学院学报, 2023, 42(5): 117-124.
[2] Deng, J., Cheng, W., Liu, Q., Jiao, Y. and Liu, J. (2022) Morphological Differentiation Characteristics and Classification Criteria of Lunar Surface Relief Amplitude. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32, 2365-2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 封志明, 张丹, 杨艳昭. 中国分县地形起伏度及其与人口分布和经济发展的相关性[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2011, 51(1): 146-151.
[4] 岳文泽, 王田雨. 资源环境承载力评价与国土空间规划的逻辑问题[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(3): 1-8.
[5] 谢龙云, 陈庭甫, 刘影, 等. 基于地形起伏度的江西省农村居民点空间分布特征研究[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 35(2): 34-42.
[6] 马宇, 李德平, 周亮, 等. 长沙市人口空间分布与地形起伏度关系分析[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2022, 45(6): 12-20.
[7] 叶胜, 田永中, 罗亚晨, 等. 重庆市RDLS与人居环境地形适宜性评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(34): 270-275.
[8] 何静. 基于栅格数据的重庆市人居环境自然适宜性评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2011.
[9] 查瑞生, 陈梦琳, 赵晓雪. 基于地形起伏度的南川区人居环境地形适宜性评价[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(10): 150-156.
[10] 封志明, 李文君, 李鹏, 等. 青藏高原地形起伏度及其地理意义[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1359-1372.
[11] 陈田田, 彭立, 刘邵权, 等. 基于GIS的横断山区地形起伏度与人口和经济的关系[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2016, 33(4): 505-512.
[12] 谢龙云. 江西省人居环境自然适宜性评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 江西师范大学, 2022.
[13] 张兆金, 陈敬春. 基于DEM和均值变点法的措勤县地形起伏度分析[J]. 中国水土保持, 2023(6): 33-36.
[14] 封志明, 唐焰, 杨艳昭, 张丹. 基于GIS的中国人居环境指数模型的建立与应用[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(12): 1327-1336.
[15] 陈熠. 长江三角洲地区人居环境自然适宜性评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 无锡: 江苏师范大学, 2018.