流动性、稳定型机构投资者与股价崩盘:有调节的中介效应
Liquidity, Stable Institutional Investors and Stock Price Collapse: Moderated Mediating Effect
摘要: 利用2008~2019年A股880家上市公司数据,考虑异质机构投资者的因素的情况下,考察流动性与股价崩盘风险之间的作用关系。研究表明:1) 流动性与股价崩盘风险之间呈现明显的正向相关性,尤其在稳定型机构分组中表现更为显著;2) 机构投资者在流动性和股价崩盘风险具有调节作用,稳定性机构投资者持股时更加显著;3) 进一步对二者作用机制的研究发现,机构投资者特别是稳定型机构投资者的中介作用显著。
Abstract: Based on the data of 880 A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2019, and considering the factors of heterogeneous institutional investors, this paper investigates the relationship between liquidity and the risk of stock price collapse. The results show that: 1) There is a significant positive correlation between liquidity and stock price collapse risk, especially when stable institutions are grouped; 2) Institutional investors have a moderating effect on liquidity and stock price collapse risk, which is more significant when stable institutional investors hold shares; 3) A further study on the mechanism of the two mechanisms shows that institutional investors, especially stable institutional investors, play a significant intermediary role.
文章引用:王浪. 流动性、稳定型机构投资者与股价崩盘:有调节的中介效应[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(3): 9127-9141. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1331113

参考文献

[1] Kim, J., Li, Y. and Zhang, L. (2011) Corporate Tax Avoidance and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-Level Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100, 639-662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Jin, L. and Myers, S. (2006) R2 around the World: New Theory and New Tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 257-292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Maug, E. (1998) Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade-Off between Liquidity and Control? The Journal of Finance, 53, 65-98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Edmans, A. (2009) Blockholder Trading, Market Efficiency, and Managerial Myopia. The Journal of Finance, 64, 2481-2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 吴晓晖, 郭晓冬, 乔政. 机构投资者抱团与股价崩盘风险[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(2): 117-135.
[7] Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1986) Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461-488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 童元松. 机构投资者对股市流动性的影响研究——基于2012年沪市横截面数据的实证分析[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 24(1): 80-87.
[9] 刘京军, 徐浩萍. 机构投资者: 长期投资者还是短期机会主义者? [J]. 金融研究, 2012(9): 141-154.
[10] 许年行, 于上尧, 伊志宏. 机构投资者羊群行为与股价崩盘风险[J]. 管理世界, 2013(7): 31-43.
[11] 蔡庆丰, 宋友勇. 超常规发展的机构投资者能稳定市场吗?——对我国基金业跨越式发展的反思[J]. 经济研究, 2010, 45(1): 90-101.
[12] 孙翔宇, 孙谦. 机构投资者异质性、融资融券制度与股价崩盘风险[J]. 上海金融, 2019(10): 8-18.
[13] 曹丰, 鲁冰, 李争光, 徐凯. 机构投资者降低了股价崩盘风险吗? [J]. 会计研究, 2015(11): 55-61+97.
[14] 熊家财. 股价信息含量的公司治理效应——基于董事会结构与CEO变更的实证研究[J]. 经济与管理, 2015, 29(5): 49-58.
[15] 李争光, 赵西卜, 曹丰, 卢晓璇. 机构投资者异质性与企业绩效——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2014, 29(5): 77-87.
[16] 宫义飞, 罗开心, 龙思橼. 异常审计费用、审计质量与股价崩盘风险[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 36(1): 56-67+80.
[17] 黄政, 钟廷勇, 刘怡芳. 内部控制质量、信息透明度与股价信息含量[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2017(3): 14-23+158-159.
[18] 陈蓉, 吴宇翔. 流动性与崩盘风险: 基于中国A股市场的研究[J]. 管理科学, 2019, 32(5): 129-138.