多媒体学习中的诱惑性细节效应
The Seductive Details Effect in Multimedia Learning
摘要: 多媒体教学的普遍使用在为教学带来便利的同时，也引发了一些问题。研究表明，学习者学习含有趣但无关的信息(诱惑性细节)，比那些学习材料中没有诱惑性细节的学习者表现差。即诱惑性细节在多媒体学习中的不当使用会引发诱惑性细节效应。根据认知负荷理论和多媒体学习的认知理论，过多的信息会使有限的工作记忆容量过载，发生认知负荷超载，从而阻碍学习过程，影响学习效果。目前的研究重点在探索诱惑性细节在多媒体学习中的边界条件，以便教育工作者在使用诱惑性细节以提高教学效率的同时，减轻诱惑性细节效应，促进学生学习。
Abstract: The widespread use of multimedia teaching brings convenience to education, but it also raises some issues. Research indicates that learners who study materials containing interesting but irrelevant information (seductive details) perform worse than those who study materials without such details. That is, the inappropriate use of seductive details in multimedia learning can trigger the seductive detail effect. According to cognitive load theory and cognitive theory of multimedia learning, an excess of information can overload the limited capacity of working memory, leading to cognitive overload, which hinders the learning process and affects learning outcomes. Current research focuses on exploring the boundary conditions of seductive details in multimedia learning, so that educators can use seductive details to improve teaching efficiency while mitigating the seductive detail effect and promoting student learning.
文章引用：罗爽. 多媒体学习中的诱惑性细节效应[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2024, 13(9): 82-88. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2024.139786

参考文献

[1] Garner, R., Gillingham, M.G. and White, C.S. (1989) Effects of ‘Seductive Details’ on Macroprocessing and Microprocessing in Adults and Children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Harp, S.F. and Mayer, R.E. (1998) How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 414-434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Harp, S.F. and Mayer, R.E. (1997) The Role of Interest in Learning from Scientific Text and Illustrations: On the Distinction between Emotional Interest and Cognitive Interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92-102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Lehman, S., Schraw, G., McCrudden, M.T. and Hartley, K. (2007) Processing and Recall of Seductive Details in Scientific Text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 569-587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Rey, G.D. (2012) A Review of Research and a Meta-Analysis of the Seductive Detail Effect. Educational Research Review, 7, 216-237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Mayer, R.E. and Fiorella, L. (2021) Introduction to Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R.E. and Fiorella, L., Eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press, 3-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Rey, G.D. (2014) Seductive Details and Attention Distraction—An Eye Tracker Experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 133-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Sundararajan, N. and Adesope, O. (2020) Keep It Coherent: A Meta-Analysis of the Seductive Details Effect. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 707-734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Mayer, R.E. (2019) Taking a New Look at Seductive Details. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 139-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Hidi, S. and Baird, W. (1988) Strategies for Increasing Text-Based Interest and Students’ Recall of Expository Texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 465-483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Ketzer‐Nöltge, A., Schweppe, J. and Rummer, R. (2018) Is the Seductive Details Effect Moderated by Mood? An Eye‐tracking Study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 62-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Sweller, J. (1994) Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Mayer, R.E. (2005) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press.
[15] Mayer, R.E. and Moreno, R. (1998) A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Mayer, R.E. and Moreno, R. (2003) Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Korbach, A., Brünken, R. and Park, B. (2016) Learner Characteristics and Information Processing in Multimedia Learning: A Moderated Mediation of the Seductive Details Effect. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 59-68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Sanchez, C.A. and Wiley, J. (2006) An Examination of the Seductive Details Effect in Terms of Working Memory Capacity. Memory & Cognition, 34, 344-355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Mayer, R.E., Griffith, E., Jurkowitz, I.T.N. and Rothman, D. (2008) Increased Interestingness of Extraneous Details in a Multimedia Science Presentation Leads to Decreased Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 329-339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Eitel, A., Bender, L. and Renkl, A. (2018) Are Seductive Details Seductive Only When You Think They Are Relevant? An Experimental Test of the Moderating Role of Perceived Relevance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 20-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Eitel, A. and Kühl, T. (2019) Editorial: Harmful or Helpful to Learning? The Impact of Seductive Details on Learning and Instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 3-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Strobel, B., Grund, S. and Lindner, M.A. (2018) Do Seductive Details Do Their Damage in the Context of Graph Comprehension? Insights from Eye Movements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 95-108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Tsai, M., Wu, A. and Chen, Y. (2019) Static and Dynamic Seductive Illustration Effects on Text‐and‐Graphic Learning Processes, Perceptions, and Outcomes: Evidence from Eye Tracking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 109-123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Schneider, S., Wirzberger, M. and Rey, G.D. (2018) The Moderating Role of Arousal on the Seductive Detail Effect in a Multimedia Learning Setting. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 71-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Abercrombie, S., Hushman, C.J. and Carbonneau, K.J. (2018) The Impact of Seductive Details and Signaling on Analogical Transfer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 38-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Koriat, A. and Bjork, R.A. (2005) Illusions of Competence in Monitoring One’s Knowledge during Study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 187-194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Alter, A.L., Oppenheimer, D.M., Epley, N. and Eyre, R.N. (2007) Overcoming Intuition: Metacognitive Difficulty Activates Analytic Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569-576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Finn, B. and Tauber, S.K. (2015) When Confidence Is Not a Signal of Knowing: How Students’ Experiences and Beliefs about Processing Fluency Can Lead to Miscalibrated Confidence. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 567-586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[29] Rothkopf, E.Z. and Billington, M.J. (1979) Goal-Guided Learning from Text: Inferring a Descriptive Processing Model from Inspection Times and Eye Movements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 310-327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[30] Maloy, J., Fries, L., Laski, F. and Ramirez, G. (2019) Seductive Details in the Flipped Classroom: The Impact of Interesting but Educationally Irrelevant Information on Student Learning and Motivation. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18, ar42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Alexander, P.A. (2003) The Development of Expertise: The Journey from Acclimation to Proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32, 10-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T. and Brünken, R. (2011) Does Cognitive Load Moderate the Seductive Details Effect? A Multimedia Study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 5-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Wang, Z., Ardasheva, Y. and Lin, L. (2019) Does High Perceptual Load Assist in Reducing the Seductive Details Effect? Educational Psychology, 41, 25-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[34] Wang, Z. and Adesope, O. (2017) Do Focused Self-Explanation Prompts Overcome Seductive Details? A Multimedia Study. Educational Technology & Society, 20, 47-57.
[35] Abercrombie, S. (2013) Transfer Effects of Adding Seductive Details to Case-Based Instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 149-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[36] Peshkam, A., Mensink, M.C., Putnam, A.L. and Rapp, D.N. (2011) Warning Readers to Avoid Irrelevant Information: When Being Vague Might Be Valuable. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 219-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐