品味的偶然相似性对宽恕倾向的影响
The Effect of Accidental Similarity of Tastes on Forgiveness Tendency
摘要: 本研究通过两个情景实验考察了品味的偶然相似对宽恕倾向的影响及其内在心理机制。实验1考察品味的偶然相似性对宽恕倾向的积极影响，并检验亲密感的中介作用；实验2考察品味小众程度的调节作用。结果发现：1) 偶然相似性会增加个体对冒犯者在情绪维度上的宽恕倾向，但是对认知和行为维度的宽恕倾向没有显著的影响；2) 亲密感在偶然相似性和宽恕倾向之间的中介作用不显著。3) 小众程度在偶然相似性与宽恕倾向之间的调节作用边缘显著。研究结果表明品味的偶然相似性可以增加人们的宽恕倾向，为缓解人际冲突中紧张的人际关系提供了理论参考。
Abstract: This study examined the effect of accidental similarity of taste on forgiveness tendency and its underlying psychological mechanism through two situational experiments. Experiment 1 examined the positive effect of accidental similarity of taste on forgiveness tendency and examined the mediating role of intimacy. Experiment 2 examined the moderating effect of taste special-interest degree. The results showed that: 1) Accidental similarity increased individuals’ forgiveness tendency on emotional dimensions, but had no significant effect on cognitive and behavioral dimensions. 2) The mediating effect of intimacy between accidental similarity and forgiveness tendency is not significant. 3) The moderating effect of special-interest degree on accidental similarity and forgiveness tendency was significant. The results show that accidental similarity of taste can increase people’s forgiveness tendency, which provides a theoretical reference for relieving interpersonal tension in interpersonal conflict.
文章引用：刘洁 (2024). 品味的偶然相似性对宽恕倾向的影响. 心理学进展, 14(9), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.149627

参考文献

[1] 张洪, 王登峰, 杨烨(2006). 亲密关系的外显与内隐测量及其相互关系. 心理学报, 38(6), 910-915.
[2] Argo, J. J., White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2006). Social Comparison Theory and Deception in the Interpersonal Exchange of Consumption Information. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 99-108.[CrossRef] 
[3] Boer, D., Fischer, R., Strack, M., Bond, M. H., Lo, E., & Lam, J. (2011). How Shared Preferences in Music Create Bonds between People: Values as the Missing Link. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1159-1171.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Burger, J. M., Messian, N., Patel, S., del Prado, A., & Anderson, C. (2004). What a Coincidence! The Effects of Incidental Similarity on Compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 35-43.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Christy, A. G., Schlegel, R. J., & Cimpian, A. (2019). Why Do People Believe in a “True Self”? The Role of Essentialist Reasoning about Personal Identity and the Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 386-416.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Chu, C., & Lowery, B. S. (2023). Self-Essentialist Reasoning Underlies the Similarity-Attraction Effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125, 1055-1071.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Dulaney, E. S., Graupmann, V., & Quinn, K. A. (2019). Who Am I and How Often? Variation in Self-Essentialism Beliefs, Cognitive Style, and Well-Being. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 148-159.[CrossRef] 
[8] Enright, R. D., Eastin, D. L., Golden, S., Sarinopoulos, I., & Freedman, S. (2011). Interpersonal Forgiveness within the Helping Professions: An Attempt to Resolve Differences of Opinion. Counseling and Values, 36, 84-103.[CrossRef] 
[9] Fincham, F. D., Paleari, F. G., & Regalia, C. (2002). Forgiveness in Marriage: The Role of Relationship Quality, Attributions, and Empathy. Personal Relationships, 9, 27-37.[CrossRef] 
[10] Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with Betrayal in Close Relationships: Does Commitment Promote Forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956-974.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Guéguen, N., & Martin, A. (2009). Incidental Similarity Facilitates Behavioral Mimicry. Social Psychology, 40, 88-92.[CrossRef] 
[12] Guéguen, N., Martin, A., & Meineri, S. (2011a). Mimicry and Helping Behavior: An Evaluation of Mimicry on Explicit Helping Request. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 1-4.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Guéguen, N., Martin, A., & Meineri, S. (2011b). Similarity and Social Interaction: When Similarity Fosters Implicit Behavior toward a Stranger. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 671-673.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Jiang, L., Hoegg, J., Dahl, D. W., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2010). The Persuasive Role of Incidental Similarity on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in a Sales Context. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 778-791.[CrossRef] 
[15] Martin, A., & Guéguen, N. (2013). The Influence of Incidental Similarity on Self-Revelation in Response to an Intimate Survey. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41, 353-356.[CrossRef] 
[16] McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D., & Tsang, J. (2003). Forgiveness, Forbearance, and Time: The Temporal Unfolding of Transgression-Related Interpersonal Motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 540-557.[CrossRef] 
[17] McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal Forgiving in Close Relationships: II. Theoretical Elaboration and Measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.[CrossRef] 
[18] McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal Forgiving in Close Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321-336.[CrossRef] 
[19] Pinel, E. C., Long, A. E., Landau, M. J., Alexander, K., & Pyszczynski, T. (2006). Seeing I to I: A Pathway to Interpersonal Connectedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 243-257.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference. Plenum Press.
[21] Strohminger, N., Knobe, J., & Newman, G. (2017). The True Self: A Psychological Concept Distinct from the Self. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 551-560.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Wernerfelt, B. (1990). Advertising Content When Brand Choice Is a Signal. The Journal of Business, 63, 91-98.[CrossRef] 
[23] White, K., & Argo, J. J. (2011). When Imitation Doesn’t Flatter: The Role of Consumer Distinctiveness in Responses to Mimicry. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 667-680.[CrossRef] 
[24] Zlatev, J. J. (2019). I May Not Agree with You, but I Trust You: Caring about Social Issues Signals Integrity. Psychological Science, 30, 880-892.[CrossRef] [PubMed]