公共数据可信交易的制度保障
Institutional Guarantees for the Trustworthy Trading of Public Data
DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.129787, PDF,   
作者: 鲍 楠:浙江理工大学法政学院、史量才新闻与传播学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 可信公共数据数据交易信任治理Trustworthy Public Data Data Trading Trust Governance
摘要: 新时代的数据要素利用与公共数据要素交易密不可分。但现状下,这一新形式的交易标的缺乏一个能激发信任、维护信任的可信任的交易环境,该环境需要法律与技术的双重保障。可以通过对信任进行跨学科归纳、提炼内在要求,以形成静态视角与动态视角双管齐下的可信秩序治理路径。首先,建立标准化的公共数据基础设施制度,在静态视角下通过标准制度保障数据质量与安全;其次,针对公共数据交易的基本流程,以场内交易为主导,通过数据登记、隐私设计、责任分配实现全流程保护,为公共数据可信交易环境提供制度保障。
Abstract: In the new era, the utilization of data elements is inseparable from the trading of public data elements. However, the current situation lacks a trustworthy trading environment that can inspire and maintain trust for this new form of trade, which requires dual protection of law and technology. By cross-disciplinary induction of trust and refinement of intrinsic requirements, a credible order governance path from both a static perspective and a dynamic perspective can be formed. Firstly, establish a standardized public data infrastructure system to ensure data quality and security from a static perspective through standard systems; secondly, for the basic process of public data trading, take the in-venue trading as the main approach, and provide full-process protection by data registration, privacy design, and responsibility distribution, to provide institutional guarantees for a trustworthy trading environment of public data.
文章引用:鲍楠. 公共数据可信交易的制度保障[J]. 法学, 2024, 12(9): 5523-5532. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2024.129787

参考文献

[1] 陆志鹏. 公共数据授权运营机制探索[J]. 网络安全与数据治理, 2022, 41(7): 34.
[2] 赵正, 杨铭鑫, 易成岐, 等. 数据财政视角下公共数据有偿使用价值分配的理论基础与政策框架[J]. 电子政务, 2024(2): 25.
[3] 包晓丽, 杜万里. 数据可信交易体系的制度构建——基于场内交易视角[J]. 电子政务, 2023(6): 39-42.
[4] 林镇阳, 侯智军, 赵蓉, 等. 数据要素生态系统视角下数据运营平台的服务类型与监管体系构建[J]. 电子政务, 2022(8): 90.
[5] 徐珉川. 论公共数据开放的可信治理[J]. 比较法研究, 2021(6): 146-147.
[6] 张清, 郭胜男. 人际信任、法律信任与数字信任: 社会信任的谱系及其演进[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(6): 51-54.
[7] 徐化耿. 论私法中的信任机制——基于信义义务与诚实信用的例证分析[J]. 法学家, 2017(4): 30-31.
[8] Henderson, M.T. and Churi, S. (2019) The Trust Revolution: How the Digitization of Trust Will Revolutionize Business and Government. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Zucker, L.G. (1986) Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.
[10] Sako, M. (1992) Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-Firm Relations in Britain and Japan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Luhmann, N. (2018) Trust and Power. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 65.
[12] 韩志明. 跨越信息不对称的陷阱: 国家治理现代化的信息维度[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2024(1): 92-93.
[13] Merrill, T. (2012) Property as Modularity. Harvard Law Review, 125, 157-158.
[14] 徐明月, 安小米. 协同理论视角下新加坡可信数据共享框架的案例分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(10): 179.
[15] 程啸. 论数据产权登记[J]. 法学评论, 2023, 41(4): 146.
[16] 杨东, 高清纯. 加快建设全国统一大市场背景下数据交易平台规制研究[J/OL]. 法治研究, 2024: 1-14. 2024-07-24.[CrossRef
[17] 王琎. 数据交易场所的机制构建与法律保障——以数据要素市场化配置为中心[J]. 江汉论坛, 2021(9): 133.
[18] 吴汉东. 论网络服务提供者的著作权侵权责任[J]. 中国法学, 2011(2): 38-46.