ESG表现促进企业价值创造的影响与路径研究
A Study on the Impact and Path of ESG Performance to Promote Corporate Value Creation
DOI: 10.12677/wer.2024.133042, PDF,    国家社会科学基金支持
作者: 李园园:西安邮电大学经济与管理学院,陕西 西安
关键词: ESG表现价值创造影响研究路径研究Performance Value Creation Impact Study Path Study
摘要: ESG作为一种新兴的投资指标,衡量企业的可持续发展能力对企业价值的影响作用及路径是亟待研究的热点。本文研究对象是在ESG理念下的企业价值创造测度及其路径研究,结果表明:企业ESG表现对企业价值的影响主要体现在环境、社会、公司治理三大方面;ESG表现通过“提升企业声誉”“降低信息不对称”“提升经营效率”“缓解融资约束”四个方面实现企业价值创造。通过相关研究,可以揭示ESG与企业价值之间的关系,其次可以识别ESG实践中的关键因素,提供实践指导,有助于推动企业关注其长期发展,从而为实现可持续发展目标做出贡献。
Abstract: ESG as an emerging investment indicator, measures the role and path of corporate sustainability on corporate value is an urgent hot spot for research. The research object of this paper is the study of corporate value creation measurement and its path under the concept of ESG, and the results show that: The impact of corporate ESG performance on corporate value is mainly reflected in the three major aspects of environment, society, and corporate governance; ESG performance can improve corporate reputation, reduce information asymmetry, enhance operational efficiency, and alleviate financing problems through the following measures ESG performance realizes corporate value creation through the four aspects of “enhancing corporate reputation”, “reducing information asymmetry”, “improving operational efficiency” and “alleviating financing constraints”. Through relevant research, the relationship between ESG and corporate value can be revealed, and secondly, the key factors in ESG practice can be identified to provide practical guidance, which can help to promote enterprises to focus on their long-term development, thus contributing to the realization of the goal of sustainable development.
文章引用:李园园. ESG表现促进企业价值创造的影响与路径研究[J]. 世界经济探索, 2024, 13(3): 373-379. https://doi.org/10.12677/wer.2024.133042

参考文献

[1] 杨东宁, 周长辉. 企业环境绩效与经济绩效的动态关系模型[J]. 中国工业经济, 2004(4): 43-50.
[2] 李伟阳, 肖红军. 基于社会资源优化配置视角的企业社会责任研究: 兼对新古典经济学企业社会责任观的批判[J]. 中国工业经济, 2009(4): 118-128.
[3] 李维安, 郝臣, 崔光耀, 等. 公司治理研究40年: 脉络与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2019, 41(12): 161-185.
[4] 张淑惠, 史玄玄, 文雷. 环境信息披露能提升企业价值吗?——来自中国沪市的经验证据[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2011(6): 166-173.
[5] 范琦. 中央企业上市公司环境责任与公司价值的相关性研究[J]. 财务与金融, 2013(3): 76-81.
[6] Buysse, K. and Verbeke, A. (2002) Proactive Environmental Strategies: A Stakeholder Management Perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 453-470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Telle, K. (2006) “It Pays to Be Green”—A Premature Conclusion? Environmental and Resource Economics, 35, 195-220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 唐勇军, 夏丽, 环保投入、环境信息披露质量与企业价值[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(10): 256-264.
[9] Stankevičienė, J. and Čepulytė, J. (2014) Sustainable Value Creation: Coherence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Performance of Socially Responsible Investment Funds. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 27, 882-898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Mittal, R.K., Sinha, N. and Singh, A. (2008) An Analysis of Linkage between Economic Value Added and Corporate Social Responsibility. Management Decision, 46, 1437-1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 王晓巍, 陈慧. 基于利益相关者的企业社会责任与企业价值关系研究[J]. 管理科学, 2011, 24(6): 29-37.
[12] 叶陈刚, 裘丽, 张立娟. 公司治理结构、内部控制质量与企业财务绩效[J]. 审计研究, 2016(2): 104-112.
[13] 宁宇新, 张志宁, 荣倩倩. EVA实施效果、企业价值与公司治理[J]. 会计之友, 2017(1): 52-56.
[14] 杨洪波, 段钰. 我国上市企业公司治理与公司价值关系的研究[J]. 现代经济信息, 2019(3): 125.
[15] Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. (1983) Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef