非工作时间工作连通行为对任务重塑的影响：有调节的中介模型
The Effect of Work Connectivity Behavior After-Hours on Job Autonomy: A Moderated Mediating Model
摘要: 本文基于资源保存理论，探讨非工作时间工作连通行为对任务重塑的影响机制。通过问卷调查162份配对样本数据，结果表明：非工作时间工作连通行为正向预测任务重塑；工作自主性在非工作时间工作连通行为与任务重塑之间起部分中介作用；职业未来时间观调节了工作自主性在非工作时间工作连通行为影响任务重塑中的调节作用，具体而言，在高职业未来时间观情境下，该中介效应更加显著。研究结果能够为员工主动行为的发展提供理论借鉴和实践参考。
Abstract: Based on the conservation of resource theory, this paper discusses the influence mechanism of work connectivity behavior after-hours on task crafting. Through the questionnaire survey of 162 paired sample data, the results show that: work connectivity behavior after-hours positively predicts task crafting; job autonomy plays a partial mediating role between work connectivity behavior after-hours and task crafting; occupational future time perspective moderates the role of job autonomy in the influence of work connectivity behavior after-hours on task crafting. Specifically, the mediating effect is more significant in the context of high occupational future time perspective. The research findings can provide theoretical and practical reference for the development of employees’ active behaviour.
文章引用：许航 (2024). 非工作时间工作连通行为对任务重塑的影响：有调节的中介模型. 心理学进展, 14(9), 481-490. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.149673

参考文献

[1] 程欢, 陈丝璐, 郭凯莉(2023). 非工作时间与工作相关电子沟通的研究评述与未来展望. 中国人力资源开发, 40(1), 6-20.
[2] 马红宇, 谢菊兰, 唐汉瑛, 申传刚, 张晓翔(2016). 工作性通信工具使用与双职工夫妻的幸福感: 基于溢出? 交叉效应的分析. 心理学报, 48(1), 48.
[3] 马丽, 唐秋迢(2022). “持续在线”的连通行为如何激发员工创造力——一个双路径模型. 华东经济管理, 36(2), 109-118.
[4] 宋一晓, 曹洲涛, 陈春花, 吴雨璐(2021). 动态工作环境如何影响员工绩效? 任务重塑与调节焦点的作用分析. 科学学与科学技术管理, 42(2), 112-128.
[5] 汪义广, 王忠军, 卢家钰, 黄蜜(2023). 职业未来时间观与职业成功: 工作重塑的中介作用. 心理科学, 46(3), 677.
[6] 赵慧军, 焦昕婷(2023). 非工作时间工作连通行为如何引发工作退缩行为?——基于资源保存理论视角. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (3), 123-132.
[7] 赵越, 王艳平, 王琛, 李行翔, 陈雨欣(2024). 非工作时间工作连通行为影响工作感受和工作行为的元分析研究. 应用心理学.
[8] Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The Measurement of Work Autonomy. Human Relations, 38, 551-570.[CrossRef] 
[9] Carstensen, L. L., & Lang, F. R. (1996). Future Time Perspective Scale. Psychology and Aging.
[10] Chang, P., Rui, H., & Wu, T. (2021). Job Autonomy and Career Commitment: A Moderated Mediation Model of Job Crafting and Sense of Calling. SAGE Open, 11, No. 1.[CrossRef] 
[11] Charles, S. T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Social and Emotional Aging. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 383-409.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Cheng, K., Cao, X., Guo, L., & Xia, Q. (2022). Work Connectivity Behavior After-Hours and Job Satisfaction: Examining the Moderating Effects of Psychological Entitlement and Perceived Organizational Support. Personnel Review, 51, 2277-2293.[CrossRef] 
[13] Froehlich, D. E., Beausaert, S., & Segers, M. (2016). Aging and the Motivation to Stay Employable. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31, 756-770.[CrossRef] 
[14] Fujimoto, Y., Ferdous, A. S., Sekiguchi, T., & Sugianto, L. (2016). The Effect of Mobile Technology Usage on Work Engagement and Emotional Exhaustion in Japan. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3315-3323.[CrossRef] 
[15] He, H., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, P. (2023). The Spillover Effect of Work Connectivity Behaviors on Employees’ Family: Based on the Perspective of Work-Home Resource Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article ID: 1067645.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Hobfoll, S. E., & Shirom, A. (2000). Conservation of Resources Theory: Applications to Stress and Management in the Workplace. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (2nd ed., pp. 57-80). Marcel Dekker.
[17] Kim, H., Im, J., & Qu, H. (2018). Exploring Antecedents and Consequences of Job Crafting. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 75, 18-26.[CrossRef] 
[18] Kooij, D., & Van De Voorde, K. (2011). How Changes in Subjective General Health Predict Future Time Perspective, and Development and Generativity Motives over the Lifespan. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 228-247.[CrossRef] 
[19] Liu, Y., Bai, Q., Yuan, Y., Li, B., Liu, P., Liu, D. et al. (2024). Impact of Work Connectivity Behavior After-Hours on Employees’ Unethical Pro-Family Behavior. Current Psychology, 43, 11785-11803.[CrossRef] 
[20] Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhao, H., & Liu, L. (2023). The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Work Connectivity Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article ID: 831862.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Niessen, C., Weseler, D., & Kostova, P. (2016). When and Why Do Individuals Craft Their Jobs? The Role of Individual Motivation and Work Characteristics for Job Crafting. Human Relations, 69, 1287-1313.[CrossRef] 
[22] Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hetland, J. (2012). Crafting a Job on a Daily Basis: Contextual Correlates and the Link to Work Engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 1120-1141.[CrossRef] 
[23] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Saragih, S., Margaretha, M., & Anantyanda, L. (2021). Job Autonomy, Job Crafting and Employees’ Well-Being during Working from Home. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 23, 177-185.[CrossRef] 
[25] Schmoll, R. (2019). Explaining Work Connectivity Behavior during Non-Work Time with an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. In Proceedings of the ICIS 2019.
[26] Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2014). Optimising Employee Mental Health: The Relationship between Intrinsic Need Satisfaction, Job Crafting, and Employee Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 957-977.[CrossRef] 
[27] ten Brummelhuis, L. L., ter Hoeven, C. L., & Toniolo-Barrios, M. (2021). Staying in the Loop: Is Constant Connectivity to Work Good or Bad for Work Performance? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 128, Article ID: 103589.[CrossRef] 
[28] Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2015). Job Crafting and Job Performance: A Longitudinal Study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 914-928.[CrossRef] 
[29] Walumbwa, F. O., Christensen-Salem, A., Babalola, M. T., Kasimu, P., Garba, O. A., & Guo, L. (2022). A Closer Look at How and When Family-Supportive Supervision Influence Work Interference with Family: The Roles of Family-Role Overload and Task Crafting. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33, 3850-3878.[CrossRef] 
[30] Wang, M., & Wanberg, C. R. (2017). 100 Years of Applied Psychology Research on Individual Careers: From Career Management to Retirement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 546-563.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work. The Academy of Management Review, 26, 179-201.[CrossRef] 
[32] Yao, S., Lu, J., Wang, H., Montgomery, J. J. W., Gorny, T., & Ogbonnaya, C. (2024). Excessive Technology Use in the Post-Pandemic Context: How Work Connectivity Behavior Increases Procrastination at Work. Information Technology & People, 37, 583-604.[CrossRef] 
[33] Zhang, L., Tekleab, A. G., Piszczek, M., & Qiu, Y. (2023). Does After-Hours Work-Related Information and Communication Technology Use Promote Work Engagement? a Preliminary Daily Dairy Study. Journal of Business Research, 157, Article ID: 113551.[CrossRef] 
[34] Zhao, L., & Wu, L. (2023). How Does Digital Office Affect Overtime through Job Autonomy in China? A Nonlinear Mediating Model for the Autonomy Paradox. Technology in Society, 72, Article ID: 102181.[CrossRef]