尴尬易感性对高中生不诚实行为的影响：观点采择的调节作用
The Influence of Embarrassment Susceptibility on Dishonest Behavior in High School Students: The Moderating Role of Perspective-Takin
摘要: 为探究尴尬易感性与高中生不诚实行为之间的关系，以及观点采择的调节作用，本研究采用问卷调查的方式以苏州某高中948位高中生为被试，采用尴尬易感性量表中文版、中文版人际反应指针量表、HEXACO-100大六人格量表进行测试。结果表明：1) 尴尬易感性显著负向预测高中生不诚实行为；2) 观点采择在尴尬易感性与不诚实行为之间具有调节作用。本研究为了解尴尬情绪给学生正确的道德认知培养和正确的情绪认知指导提供一定的参考和依据。
Abstract: To investigate the relationship between susceptibility to embarrassment and dishonest behavior among high school students, as well as the moderating role of perspective-taking, this study employed a questionnaire survey method with 948 high school students from a school in Suzhou as the participants. The Chinese version of the Embarrassment Susceptibility Scale, the Chinese version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index-C, and the HEXACO-100 Scale were used for testing. The results indicate that: 1) Susceptibility to embarrassment significantly negatively predicts dishonest behavior among high school students; 2) Perspective-taking moderates the relationship between susceptibility to embarrassment and dishonest behavior. This study provides a reference and basis for understanding the impact of embarrassment emotions on students’ correct moral cognitive development and emotional cognitive guidance.
文章引用：杨楠, 吴继霞 (2024). 尴尬易感性对高中生不诚实行为的影响：观点采择的调节作用. 心理学进展, 14(9), 516-522. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.149676

参考文献

[1] 范伟, 任梦梦, 肖俊泽, 简增郸, 杜晓明, 傅小兰(2019). 羞耻情绪对欺骗行为的影响: 自我控制的作用. 心理学报, 51(9), 992-1006.
[2] 刘艳丽, 刘勇, 陆桂芝, 陈健芷, 陈巍(2015). 尴尬易感性量表中文版用于大学生样本的效度和信度. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(3), 401-405, 462.
[3] 吴继霞, 何雯静, 杜晶(2017). 在中小学生诚信品质培养中架设知行之桥. 中国德育, (8), 12-16.
[4] 吴继霞, 黄希庭(2012). 诚信结构初探. 心理学报, 44(3), 354-368.
[5] 余宏波, 刘桂珍(2006). 移情、道德推理、观点采择与亲社会行为关系的研究进展. 心理发展与教育, 22(1), 113-116.
[6] 俞国良, 赵军燕(2009). 自我意识情绪: 聚焦于自我的道德情绪研究. 心理发展与教育, 25(2), 116-120.
[7] 张凤凤, 董毅, 汪凯, 詹志禹, 谢伦芳(2010). 中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)的信度及效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 155-157.
[8] 赵中(2021). 内疚情绪对诚信行为的影响. 博士学位论文, 苏州: 苏州大学.
[9] Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.[CrossRef] 
[10] DePaulo, B. M., & Kashy, D. A. (1998). Everyday Lies in Close and Casual Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 63-79.[CrossRef] 
[11] Frank, R. H. (2004). Introducing Moral Emotions into Models of Rational Choice. In E. Shafer-Landau, & R. J. Zucker (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium (pp. 422-440). Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef] 
[12] Guo, Z., Li, W., Yang, Y., & Kou, Y. (2021). Honesty‐Humility and Unethical Behavior in Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement and the Moderating Role of System Justification. Journal of Adolescence, 90, 11-22.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Huneke, M., & Pinel, E. C. (2016). Fostering Selflessness through I-Sharing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 10-18.[CrossRef] 
[14] Kelly, K. M., & Jones, W. H. (1997). Assessment of Dispositional Embarrassability. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 10, 307-333.[CrossRef] 
[15] Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25, 543-556.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2006). Dishonesty in Everyday Life and Its Policy Implications. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25, 117-126.[CrossRef] 
[17] Sherf, E. N., & Morrison, E. W. (2020). I Do Not Need Feedback! Or Do I? Self-Efficacy, Perspective Taking, and Feedback Seeking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105, 146-165.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Smetana, J. G., & Villalobos, M. (2009). Social Cognitive Development in Adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Psychology: Individual Bases of Adolescent Development (3rd ed., pp. 187-228). John Wiley & Sons.
[19] Walczyk, J. J., Harris, L. L., Duck, T. K., & Mulay, D. (2014). A Social-Cognitive Framework for Understanding Serious Lies: Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 22-36.[CrossRef] 
[20] Yaniv, I., & Choshen‐Hillel, S. (2012). Exploiting the Wisdom of Others to Make Better Decisions: Suspending Judgment Reduces Egocentrism and Increases Accuracy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 427-434.[CrossRef]