英语学术语篇作者声音构建的历时研究
A Diachronic Study on Authorial Voice Construction in English Academic Discourse
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2024.1210861, PDF,   
作者: 李祯祯：天津工业大学人文学院，天津
关键词: 学术语篇；作者声音；历时变化；Academic Discourse； Authorial Voice； Diachronic Change
摘要: 声音构建是学术论文写作必不可少的重要内容，能够帮助作者确立显现度以及学术身份，有效实现与读者的协商与互动。本研究首先基于声音的对话性特征，结合Hyland (2005)的引导类资源和Martain & White (2005)的介入系统的理论，对英语学术语篇的作者声音构建的历时发展进行比较分析。研究发现，引导类元话语资源在不同时间阶段和学科均呈上升趋势，同时，对话扩展类资源的使用也呈上升趋势，这体现了写作中作者声音构建的人际互动特征。研究有助于揭示科学话语的历时演变，并且帮助写作者在写作过程中合理运用声音资源以提高学术写作水平。
Abstract: Voice construction is a vital component in academic writing, which can help writers establish visibility and academic identity and effectively negotiate and interact with readers. Drawing upon the dialogic nature of voice and integrating Hyland’s (2005) model of interactive resources with Martin & White’s (2005) engagement system, this article studies the diachronic development of linguistic realization in authorial voice construction in English academic discourse. The results show that the use of interactive resources is on the rise from 1980 to 2020, and the use of dialogue expansion resources is also on the rise, which reflects the interpersonal interaction characteristics of the authorial voice construction in academic writing. This study helps to uncover the diachronic evolution of scientific discourse and helps writers make rational use of voice resources in the writing process to improve the quality of academic writing.
文章引用：李祯祯. 英语学术语篇作者声音构建的历时研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2024, 12(10): 72-78. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2024.1210861

参考文献

[1] Stapleton, P. (2002) Critiquing Voice as a Viable Pedagogical Tool in L2 Writing: Returning the Spotlight to Ideas. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 177-190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Helms-Park, R. and Stapleton, P. (2003) Questioning the Importance of Individualized Voice in Undergraduate L2 Argumentative Writing: An Empirical Study with Pedagogical Implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 245-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 姜峰. 基于多维分析的学术语篇语体特征的历时考察[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2020, 52(5): 663-673+798.
[4] Mhilli, O. (2023) Authorial Voice in Writing: A Literature Review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8, Article 100550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] 唐青叶. 学术语篇中的转述现象外语与外语教学[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2004(2): 3-6.
[6] Hyland, K. (2002) Authority and Invisibility. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] 张大群. 学术论文声音研究: 概念流变与三维分析框架构建[J]. 外国语言文学, 2023, 40(3): 98-110+136.
[8] Elbow, P. (1968) A Method for Teaching Writing. College English, 30, 115-125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Stewart, D.C. (1969) Prose with Integrity: A Primary Objective. College Composition & Communication, 20, 223-227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Matsuda, P.K. (2001) Voice in Japanese Written Discourse. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 35-53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Hyland, K. (2012) Undergraduate Understandings: Stance and Voice in Final Year Reports. In: Hyland, K. and Guinda, C.S., Eds., Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, Palgrave Macmillan UK, 134-150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Matsuda, P.K. and Tardy, C.M. (2007) Voice in Academic Writing: The Rhetorical Construction of Author Identity in Blind Manuscript Review. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 235-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Morton, J. and Storch, N. (2019) Developing an Authorial Voice in PhD Multilingual Student Writing: The Reader’s Perspective. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 15-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] 赵冠芳. 国外写作声音研究: 回顾、分析与启示[J]. 外语界, 2013(3): 67-76.
[15] 刘秋成, 梁慧. “voice”互动模型下学术语篇中的‘声音’解读[J]. 巢湖学院学报, 2017, 19(5): 99-10.
[16] Botelho de Magalhães, M., Cotterall, S. and Mideros, D. (2019) Identity, Voice and Agency in Two EAL Doctoral Writing Contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 4-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Hamalian, L. (1970) The Visible Voice: An Approach to Writing. English Journal, 59, 227-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Bondi, M. (2012) Voice in Textbooks: Between Exposition and Argument. In: Hyland, K. and Guinda, C.S., Eds., Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, Palgrave Macmillan UK, 101-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] 王月丽. 二语学术写作者声音研究: 概念、路径与潜势[J]. 浙江外国语学院学报, 2020(5): 70-75+95.
[20] Hyland, K. (2008) Disciplinary Voices. English Text Construction, 1, 5-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Yasuda, S. (2022) Natural Scientists’ Perceptions of Authorial Voice in Scientific Writing: The Influence of Disciplinary Expertise on Revoicing Processes. English for Specific Purposes, 67, 31-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Hyland, K. (2005) Meta-Discourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum.
[23] Martin, J.R. and White, P.P. (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
[24] Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. (2018) In This Paper We Suggest: Changing Patterns of Disciplinary Meta-Discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]