“职业闭店人”现象的法律审视与治理策略研究
Study on the Legal Examination and Governance Strategy of the Phenomenon of “Professional Store Closers”
摘要: 近年来,在餐饮、健身、美容美发、教育培训等领域,预付式消费越发流行。但预付式消费乱象频出,甚至出现了专门以恶意帮助商家“闭店”为获利方式的“职业闭店人”。他们的目标客户大多是以预付式消费为主要营收来源的经营者,其目的是最大限度地让经营者占有消费款。“职业闭店人”现象的存在,严重损害了消费者利益,扰乱市场经济秩序。其中,预付式消费的潜在风险、企业法定代表人变更的形式审查风险、消费者举证困难以及刑事追究力度不足构成了“职业闭店人”现象治理的现实困境。为此,通过明确预付式消费模式下“职业闭店人”民事责任、建立资金监管及信息审查制度、合理划分举证责任以及从刑事犯罪的角度进行打击,以期对“职业闭店人”现象进行有效治理。
Abstract: In recent years, prepaid consumption has become more and more popular in the fields of catering, fitness, beauty salons, education and training. However, prepaid consumption disorder occurs frequently, and there are even “professional store closers” who specialize in malicious ways to help businesses “close stores” for profit. Most of their target customers are operators with prepaid consumption as the main source of revenue, and their purpose is to maximize the ownership of consumption funds by operators. The existence of the phenomenon of “professional store closers” seriously damages the interests of consumers and disturbs the order of the market economy. Among them, the potential risk of prepaid consumption, the risk of the form review of the change of enterprise legal representative, and the risk of the liability of pan-economic dispute treatment constitute the realistic dilemma of the management of the phenomenon of “professional shutters”. To this end, by clarifying the civil liability of “professional store closers” under the prepayment consumption mode, establishing the fund supervision and information review system, reasonably dividing the burden of proof and cracking down on the criminal crime, the phenomenon of “professional store closers” can be effectively managed.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
刘胤衡, 陈晓, 黄冲. “职业闭店人”如何帮商家“金蝉脱壳” [N]. 中国青报, 2024-05-21(007).
|
|
[2]
|
徐海燕. 预付式消费遭遇跑路的法律规制研究[J]. 人民论坛, 2022(2): 88-91.
|
|
[3]
|
谷瀛. 预付式消费存在问题及解决建议[J]. 商场现代化, 2022(9): 5-7.
|
|
[4]
|
李建伟. 预付式消费及押金制度的规则理解与适用[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2024(3): 18-20.
|
|
[5]
|
傅曦林. 股份有限公司股权变动公示制度研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2010.
|
|
[6]
|
李秀霞, 赵晨笑. 失信被执行人信用惩戒机制的困境与破解[J]. 山东法官培训学院学报, 2019, 35(6): 79-89.
|
|
[7]
|
王红霞, 张瑜. 服务类预付式消费法律规制研究[J]. 人民法治, 2020(6): 52-55.
|
|
[8]
|
杨世盛. 我国环境民事公益诉讼证明责任分配的优化路径[J]. 研究生法学, 2020(3): 103-108.
|
|
[9]
|
陈兴良. 刑民交叉案件审理的司法规则——实体法与程序法的双重考察[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2024(2): 3-17.
|
|
[10]
|
邓子滨. 刑事诉讼原理[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2019.
|
|
[11]
|
赵玲玲. “政府-市场-社会”三轮驱动: 预付式消费治理的实现路径[J]. 行政与法, 2024(7): 39-53.
|
|
[12]
|
管荻, 李佳慧, 孙悦. 着力破解单用途商业预付卡治理难题[J]. 浙江经济, 2023(2): 74-75.
|
|
[13]
|
赵玲玲, 王智赟. “政府 + 市场”视角下预付式消费治理: 动因、困境与提升路径[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2024(3): 43-49.
|
|
[14]
|
最高人民法院民法典贯彻实施工作领导小组. 中华人民共和国民法典合同编理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2020.
|
|
[15]
|
孟强. 合同格式条款效力的法律控制——以《民法典》合同编及其司法解释为中心[J]. 广东社会科学, 2024(1): 243-260.
|
|
[16]
|
西田典之. 共犯理论的展开[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2017.
|