强制执行程序中当事人最低生活保障制度研究——以生存权与债权冲突为视角
Research on the Minimum Living Allowance System of the Parties in the Compulsory Execution Procedure—From the Perspective of the Conflict between the Right to Existenceand Creditor’s Rights
摘要: 当前,随着经济高质量发展,我国已经形成了具有中国特色的社会保障制度,但对于最低的社会生活标准在不同情境下的确定研究相对较少,其中被执行人的最低生活保障权利容易被忽视。生存是享受其他权利的基础,在强制执行程序中最低生活保障即生存权与债权冲突后,不能进行简单的价值位阶判断,要在个案中作客观和理性的衡量,确定权利之间的边界,保护当事人最低生活保障权利。
Abstract: At present, with the high-quality development of China’s economy, a social security system with Chinese characteristics has been formed, and there are relatively few studies on the determination of the minimum living allowance in different situations, among which the right of the executed person to the minimum living allowance is easily ignored. Survival is the basis for the enjoyment of other rights. After the conflict between the right of survival and creditor’s rights in the enforcement procedure, it is not possible to make a simple judgment of value rank, but an objective and rational measurement should be made in the case to determine the boundary between the rights and protect the parties’ right of subsistence.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
[日]大须贺明. 生存权论[M]. 林浩, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2001.
|
|
[2]
|
范进学, 马冲冲. 基本权利冲突命题的追问与反思[J]. 法学杂志, 2023, 44(2): 107-120.
|
|
[3]
|
谢立斌. 论宪法财产权的保护范围[J]. 中国法学, 2014(4): 119-132.
|
|
[4]
|
梁迎修. 权利冲突的司法化解[J]. 法学研究, 2014, 36(2): 61-72.
|
|
[5]
|
黄锴. 论社会救助权的本土塑造——以法律与政策的互动为视角[J]. 南通大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 34(6): 58-65.
|
|
[6]
|
毋爱斌. 民事执行检察监督的立法表达[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2024, 32(4): 99-111.
|
|
[7]
|
肖正磊. 民事执行检察监督的实践探索和制度完善[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2024, 32(4): 84-98.
|
|
[8]
|
游伟. “地摊经济”的宪法原理阐释及证成——以公民生存权为视角[J]. 法治社会,2023(5): 70-80.
|