稀疏反褶积正则化策略优选:数学模型构建与性能评估
Optimal Selection of Sparse Deconvolution Regularization Strategy: Mathematical Model Construction and Performance Evaluation
摘要: 在地震资料反演中,反褶积是一种重要的压缩地震子波、提高薄层纵向分辨率的地震数据处理方法。由于地层为层状结构,反射系数可视作稀疏的脉冲序列,因此地震反褶积可以描述为稀疏求解问题。然而,反褶积问题通常是病态的,需要引入正则化约束以获得稳定和准确的解。本研究介绍了几种不同的正则化方法,包括L1正则化、L2正则化、Cauchy正则化以及结合L1和L2正则化的方法,给出了它们的数学模型,并着重比较了Cauchy正则化与结合L1和L2正则化的方法。通过简单的一维模型和复杂的Marmousi2 (二维)模型的实验,我们评估了这些正则化方法在稀疏脉冲反褶积中的性能表现。结果表明,结合L1和L2正则化的联合方法在噪声抑制和分辨率提升方面表现优异,能够更准确地恢复地下结构的真实反射特性。本文的研究为选择适当的正则化策略以优化地震数据的反褶积处理提供了理论支持和实用指导。
Abstract: In seismic data inversion, deconvolution is an important seismic data processing method that compresses seismic wavelets and improves the vertical resolution of thin layers. Due to the layered structure of the strata, the reflection coefficient can be regarded as a sparse pulse sequence, so seismic deconvolution can be described as a sparse solution problem. However, deconvolution problems are often pathological and require the introduction of regularization constraints to obtain stable and accurate solutions. This study introduces several different regularization methods, including L1 regularization, L2 regularization, Cauchy regularization, and methods combining L1 and L2 regularization. Their mathematical models are given, and the comparison between Cauchy regularization and methods combining L1 and L2 regularization is emphasized. We evaluated the performance of these regularization methods in sparse pulse deconvolution through experiments using a simple one-dimensional model and a complex Marmousi2 (two-dimensional) model. The results show that the joint method combining L1 and L2 regularization performs well in noise suppression and resolution improvement, and can more accurately restore the true reflection characteristics of underground structures. This study provides theoretical support and practical guidance for selecting appropriate regularization strategies to optimize the deconvolution processing of seismic data.
文章引用:崔志伟. 稀疏反褶积正则化策略优选:数学模型构建与性能评估[J]. 理论数学, 2024, 14(10): 261-272. https://doi.org/10.12677/pm.2024.1410367

参考文献

[1] Sheriff, R.E. and Geldart, L.P. (1995) Exploration Seismology. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 陆基孟, 王永刚. 地震勘探原理[M]. 第3版. 东营: 石油大学出版社, 2009.
[3] Wang, H.Z., Guo, S., Zhou, Y., et al. (2019) Broadband Acoustic Impedance Model Building for Broadband, Wide-Azimuth, and High-Density Seismic Data. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 58, 1-8
[4] Velis, D.R. (2008) Stochastic Sparse-Spike Deconvolution. Geophysics, 73, R1-R9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 张永刚. 地震波阻抗反演技术的现状和发展[J]. 石油物探, 2002, 41(4): 385-390.
[6] 王圣川. 正则化约束稀疏脉冲地震反演方法及应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2014.
[7] 王东燕. 地震约束波阻抗反演及应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2006.
[8] 井斯亮. 基于模型的波阻抗反演在辽河地区的应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2017.
[9] 彭传平. 宽带约束反演方法实现及应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2008.
[10] 孙娅. 正则化方法在地球物理不适定反演中研究现状[C]//中国地球物理学会. 中国地球物理∙2009. 中国地球物理学会第二十五届年会论文集. 2009: 2.
[11] 付庆云. 求解非线性反问题的稀疏约束正则化方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2012.
[12] Du, X., Li, G., Li, H., Zhang, W. and Tang, B. (2017) Frequency-Domain Multitrace Band-Limited Sparsity Deconvolution. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 834-838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 李国发, 秦德海, 彭更新, 等. 稀疏约束反褶积方法实验分析与应用研究(英文) [J]. 应用地球物理(英文版), 2013, 10(2): 200-236.
[14] 张繁昌, 刘杰, 印兴耀, 等. 修正柯西约束地震盲反褶积方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2008, 43(4): 391-396.
[15] 曹磊. 基于Gabor变换的反褶积方法研究及应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2009.
[16] Wang, L., Zhao, Q., Gao, J., Xu, Z., Fehler, M. and Jiang, X. (2016) Seismic Sparse-Spike Deconvolution via Toeplitz-sparse Matrix Factorization. Geophysics, 81, V169-V182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 康治梁, 张雪冰. 基于L1/2正则化理论的地震稀疏反褶积[J]. 石油物探, 2019, 58(6): 855-863.
[18] 倪文军, 刘少勇, 王丽萍, 等. 基于深度学习的子波整形反褶积方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2023, 58(6): 1313-1321.
[19] Ulrych, T.J., Velis, D.R. and Sacchi, M.D. (1995) Wavelet Estimation Revisited. The Leading Edge, 14, 1139-1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef