固硫灰渣–水泥基泡沫轻质土性能与机理
Performance and Mechanism of Sulfur-Fixing Ash-Cement Based Foam Lightweight Soil
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2024.1310217, PDF,   
作者: 翟彬*, 姚义胜:济南城市建设集团有限公司,山东 济南;马梦媛, 侯智坚:山东大学齐鲁交通学院,山东 济南
关键词: 泡沫轻质土固硫灰渣活性激发水固比微观机理分析Foamed Lightweight Soil Sulfur Fixation Ash Activation Stimulation Water-Solid Ratio Microscopic Mechanism Analysis
摘要: 采用固硫灰渣替代水泥制作泡沫轻质土,可有效降低成本。通过比选不同的活性激发方式对固硫灰渣活性的影响,进一步提高了固硫灰渣在泡沫轻质土中的掺量。采用化学激发的方式最有效,DEIPA激发剂的最佳掺量为0.04%,与未改性前相比提高了26%。过筛处理对材料的强度和流值没有明确区别。机械磨细虽然能提高材料的早期强度,但是过细的粒径会导致材料消泡。因此推荐采用化学激发的方式提高固硫灰渣的掺量。分析了固硫灰渣基泡沫轻质土材料的吸水率、密度、强度、软化系数等,给出推荐固硫灰渣掺量为280 kg/m3。随着养护龄期的增加,材料的吸水率逐渐降低,密度相对稳定。强度随着水泥掺量的增加而增加,在干燥环境下,强度无明显变化。软化系数均大于0.85,水稳系数较高。
Abstract: Using desulfurized slag to replace cement in the production of foamed lightweight soil can effectively reduce costs. By comparing different methods of activating the activity of desulfurized slag, the amount of desulfurized slag added to the foamed lightweight soil was further increased. The chemical activation method is the most effective, with the optimal dosage of DEIPA activator being 0.04%, an increase of 26% compared to before modification. Screening treatment does not have a clear difference in the strength and flow value of the material. Although mechanical grinding can improve the early strength of the material, overly fine particle size will cause the material to deflate. Therefore, chemical activation is recommended to increase the amount of desulfurized slag added. The water absorption rate, density, strength, and softening coefficient of the desulfurized slag-based foamed lightweight soil material were analyzed, and it is recommended that the desulfurized slag content be 280 kg/m3. As the curing age increases, the water absorption rate of the material gradually decreases, while the density remains relatively stable. The strength increases with the increase in cement content, and there is no significant change in strength under dry conditions. The softening coefficient is all greater than 0.85, and the water stability coefficient is high.
文章引用:翟彬, 姚义胜, 马梦媛, 侯智坚. 固硫灰渣–水泥基泡沫轻质土性能与机理[J]. 土木工程, 2024, 13(10): 1984-1996. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2024.1310217

参考文献

[1] 钱觉时, 郑洪伟, 宋远明, 等. 流化床燃煤固硫灰渣的特性[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2008, 36(10): 1396-1400.
[2] 王文龙, 施正伦, 骆仲泱, 等. 流化床脱硫灰渣的特性与综合利用研究[J]. 电站系统工程, 2002, 18(5): 19-21.
[3] 李志达, 高鹏, 张建中, 等. CFB灰渣注浆材料在吕梁国道209采空区注浆处治工程中的应用研究[J]. 湖南交通科技, 2023, 49(2): 19-22, 47.
[4] Gao, X., Zhou, Q., Wang, Y., Qi, T., Shen, L., Liu, G., et al. (2023) Coal Fly Ash Resource Utilization: Structure of Siloxy Group of High-Modulus Sodium Silicate Solution. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 171, 396-404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Korde, C., Cruickshank, M., West, R.P. and Pellegrino, C. (2019) Activated Slag as Partial Replacement of Cement Mortars: Effect of Temperature and a Novel Admixture. Construction and Building Materials, 216, 506-524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Li, J., Cao, S., Yilmaz, E. and Liu, Y. (2022) Compressive Fatigue Behavior and Failure Evolution of Additive Fiber-Reinforced Cemented Tailings Composites. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 29, 345-355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 芋艳梅, 刘永明. 固硫灰渣和粉煤灰的特性对比分析[J]. 水泥工程, 2021(4): 8-11.
[8] 范江团. 浅析隰吉高速公路建设新材料应用与管理新理念[J]. 四川建材, 2021, 47(11): 121-122.
[9] 黄煜镔, 钱觉时, 张建业, 等. 燃煤固硫灰渣混凝土路面材料研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2011, 19(5): 767-775.
[10] 宋远明, 刘景相, 王志娟, 等. 固硫灰渣蒸压砖制备及性能研究[J]. 粉煤灰综合利用, 2012, 26(5): 38-39, 42.
[11] 卢道涵, 张海兵, 胡心龙, 等. 废弃泥浆制作水泥泡沫轻质土室内试验研究[J]. 四川建材, 2024, 50(8): 37-38, 50.
[12] 胡学文, 高宏江, 阮丛辉, 等. 泡沫轻质土在台背路基处治中的研究进展[J]. 四川建材, 2024, 50(8): 25-26.
[13] 陈朋, 陈俊玮, 牛立可, 等. 粉煤灰基泡沫轻质土新旧路基搭接施工变形特性研究[C]//中国公路学会, 中国航海学会, 中国铁道学会, 中国航空学会, 中国汽车工程学会. 2024世界交通运输大会(WTC2024)论文集(公路工程). 青岛: 世界交通运输大会执委会, 2024: 6.
[14] 侯智坚. 固废基泡沫轻质土配合比设计及耐久性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2021.
[15] 赵文龙. 循环流化床锅炉脱硫固体废弃物特性及应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 中北大学, 2016.