基于机器学习的路基压实质量评价研究
Research on Subgrade Compaction Quality Evaluation Based on Machine Learning
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2024.1310220, PDF,   
作者: 马世骏*, 殷 明, 徐学彬:济南城市建设集团有限公司,山东 济南;王育杰:山东大学齐鲁交通学院,山东 济南
关键词: 路基压实压实质量人工神经网络Subgrade Compaction Compaction Quality Evaluations Artificial Neural Network
摘要: 针对现有的智能压实技术应用于粗粒土填料时的适配性不足,以及在多变施工场景下压实度预测准确性不足的问题方面,本文成功开发了一种依据压实度的增量原则进行优化的人工神经网络模型。研究结果显示,通过将粗粒土压实质量的关键评价指标逐一加入模型,显著提升了模型的预测准确度,预测误差随着输入参数数量的增加而显著减少,并最终达到稳定状态。包含四个参数(2次谐波分量、CMV、加速度上峰值和THD)的综合评价模型,在粗粒土路基压实质量评估中表现最佳,其平均绝对误差(MAE)和均方误差(MSE)分别降至0.63和0.79,最大偏差控制在1.82%以内。这些改进确保了模型输出的压实度与现场实测值高度吻合,实现了对路基压实质量的高效、实时智能评估。
Abstract: In response to the insufficiency of adaptability of existing intelligent compaction technologies when applied to coarse-grained soil fillers, and the lack of accuracy in compaction degree prediction under variable construction scenarios, this paper successfully developed an artificial neural network model optimized based on the incremental principle of compaction degree. The research findings indicate that by incrementally incorporating key evaluation indicators of coarse-grained soil compaction quality into the model, the predictive accuracy of the model was significantly enhanced, with the prediction error markedly decreasing as the number of input parameters increased, eventually reaching a stable state. The comprehensive evaluation model, which includes four parameters (A, Au, CMV, THD), demonstrated the best performance in the assessment of compaction quality for coarse-grained soil subgrades, with the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Squared Error (MSE) reduced to 0.63 and 0.79, respectively, and the maximum deviation controlled within 1.82%. These improvements ensure that the model's output of compaction degree closely matches the field-measured values, achieving efficient and real-time intelligent assessment of subgrade compaction quality.
文章引用:马世骏, 殷明, 徐学彬, 王育杰. 基于机器学习的路基压实质量评价研究[J]. 土木工程, 2024, 13(10): 2024-2034. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2024.1310220

参考文献

[1] 冯永乾, 江辉煌, 吴龙梁, 等. 填筑工程连续压实控制技术研究进展[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2020, 64(7): 50-58+63.
[2] 张月魁, 袁海文, 蔡树向, 等. 振动压路机压实度检测系统设计[J]. 测控技术, 2014, 33(4): 46-49+53.
[3] 徐光辉, 高辉, 雒泽华, 等. 连续与智能压实控制技术在高速铁路建设中的应用[J]. 筑路机械与施工机械化, 2017, 34(1): 30-34.
[4] 林国利, 陆永明, 程经纬. 连续压实管理系统的研究和应用优势[J]. 测绘通报, 2017(6): 114-117+121.
[5] Cao, L., Zhou, J., Li, T., Chen, F. and Dong, Z. (2021) Influence of Roller-Related Factors on Compaction Meter Value and Its Prediction Utilizing Artificial Neural Network. Construction and Building Materials, 268, Article 121078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Adam, D. and Kopf, F. (2004) Operational Devices for Compaction Optimization and Quality Control (Continuous Compaction Control & Light Falling Weight Device). Automation in Construction, 89, 162-169.
[7] Forssblad, L. (1980) Compaction Meter on Vibrating Rollers for Improved Compaction Control. Proceedings of the International Conference on Compaction, 2, 541-546.
[8] Nohse, Y. and Kitano, M. (2002) Development of a New Type of Single Drum Vibratory Roller. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Technologies and Information Society for Terrain-Vehicle Systems, Vicksburg, 20-24.
[9] Fathi, A., Tirado, C., Rocha, S., Mazari, M. and Nazarian, S. (2021) A Machine-Learning Approach for Extracting Modulus of Compacted Unbound Aggregate Base and Subgrade Materials Using Intelligent Compaction Technology. Infrastructures, 6, Article 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Wang, X., Dong, X., Zhang, Z., Zhang, J., Ma, G. and Yang, X. (2022) Compaction Quality Evaluation of Subgrade Based on Soil Characteristics Assessment Using Machine Learning. Transportation Geotechnics, 32, Article 100703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Tophel, A., Walker, J.P., Dutta, T.T. and Kodikara, J. (2022) Using a Novel Instrumented Roller to Estimate Soil Dry Density during Compaction. In: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Springer, 538-546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T. and Koyama, M. (2019) Optuna. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, New York, 4-8 August 2019, 2623-2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Xue, Z., Cao, W., Liu, S., Ren, F. and Wu, Q. (2021) Artificial Neural Network-Based Method for Real-Time Estimation of Compaction Quality of Hot Asphalt Mixes. Applied Sciences, 11, Article 7136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 高大启. 有教师的线性基本函数前向三层神经网络结构研究[J]. 电路与系统学报, 1997, 2(3): 31-37.
[15] 王韬. 基于BP神经网络的供水管网爆管风险预测模型研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2019.
[16] Boumiza, S. and Braham, R. (2023) In-Vehicle Network Intrusion Detection Using DNN with ReLU Activation Function. 2023 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW), Sousse, 3-5 October 2023, 410-416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Kaloev, M. and Krastev, G. (2021) Comparative Analysis of Activation Functions Used in the Hidden Layers of Deep Neural Networks. 2021 3rd International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications, Ankara, 11-13 June 2021, 1-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Chien, J. and Lu, T. (2015) Deep Recurrent Regularization Neural Network for Speech Recognition. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, South Brisbane, 19-24 April 2015, 4560-4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef