认罪认罚从宽制度中被追诉人反悔权研究
Research on the Penitent Right of the Accused in the System of Lenient Punishment of Guilty Plea
DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.1210889, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 徐志亮:青海民族大学法学院,青海 西宁
关键词: 认罪认罚从宽自愿性保障与规制Lenient Punishment of Guilty Plea Voluntary Guarantee and Regulation
摘要: 在认罪认罚从宽制度的架构内,犯罪嫌疑人或被告人被授予了一项特定权利,即有权撤回先前作出的有罪供述及已签订的认罪认罚协议,该权利通常被称为反悔权。从司法实践的具体操作层面分析,反悔权的行使充分彰显了对犯罪嫌疑人或被告人认罪认罚自主性与真实意愿的深度尊重,其合理性与必要性显得尤为突出。然而,为避免司法资源的无谓损耗,并确保受害者的合法权益不受侵害,亟需构建一套科学且合理的监管机制,以有效遏制反悔权的滥用现象。因此,为推动我国认罪认罚从宽制度的稳健前行,必须积极着手构建并不断完善犯罪嫌疑人或被告人在认罪认罚后的反悔机制。
Abstract: In the framework of the lenient punishment system for guilty plea, the criminal suspect or defendant is granted a specific right, that is, the right to withdraw the previous confession and the signed confession agreement, which is usually known as the penitent right. From the specific operational level of judicial practice, the exercise of the penitent right fully demonstrates the deep respect for the autonomy and true will of the criminal suspect or defendant to confess and punish, and its rationality and necessity are particularly prominent. However, in order to avoid the unnecessary loss of judicial resources and ensure that the legitimate rights and interests of the victims are not infringed, it is urgent to build a scientific and reasonable supervision mechanism to effectively curb the abuse of the penitent right. Therefore, in order to promote the steady progress of the system of lenient punishment in China, we must actively start to construct and constantly improve the mechanism of the suspect or defendant after the confession.
文章引用:徐志亮. 认罪认罚从宽制度中被追诉人反悔权研究[J]. 法学, 2024, 12(10): 6268-6272. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2024.1210889

参考文献

[1] 霍磊. 认罪认罚视阈下被追诉人反悔权问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2023.
[2] 陈影珊. 认罪认罚协议破裂后的制度应对问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学, 2022.
[3] 谢小剑. 认罪认罚从宽制度中被追诉人反悔权研究[J]. 江西社会科学, 2022, 42(1): 84-93+207.
[4] 闫召华. 认罪认罚后“反悔”的保障与规制[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2021(4): 143-159.
[5] 肖沛权. 论被追诉人认罪认罚的反悔权[J]. 法商研究, 2021, 38(4): 172-185.
[6] 张小燕, 黄博儒. 被告人认罪认罚反悔问题研究[J]. 行政与法, 2021(1): 103-112.