顿悟的原型启发机制及其影响因素
Mechanism of Insight Prototype Elicitation and Its Influencing Factors
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2015.512093, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 2,427  浏览: 6,195 
作者: 周娅菲, 陈 旭:西南大学心理学部,重庆
关键词: 顿悟原型启发理论影响因素Insight Prototype Elicitation Theory Influence Factors
摘要: 自顿悟的原型启发理论提出并得到验证后,研究发现了原型激活的自动化加工与关键启发信息提取的控制加工机制,以及顿悟的原型启发的脑机制。而针对影响顿悟的原型启发的因素的研究发现,睡眠、情绪和动机以及不同类型的“原型”材料都会影响个体的顿悟。而在前人研究的基础上,后续研究应将研究成果进一步应用到实践,以期找到提升个体顿悟能力的有效方法。
Abstract: Since prototype elicitation theory of insight has been proposed and verified, many studies found that prototype activation was automation processing, extraction of key heuristic information was controlled processing, and what the brain mechanism of insight prototype elicitation was. Many studies focused on influence factors of prototype elicitation found that sleep, mood and motivation as well as different types of “prototype” material would affect the individual’s insight. And on the basis of predecessors’ research, future research should be further applied to practice, hoping to find an effective approach to improve individual’s ability of insight.
文章引用:周娅菲, 陈旭 (2015). 顿悟的原型启发机制及其影响因素. 心理学进展, 5(12), 717-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2015.512093

参考文献

[1] 曹贵康, 杨东, 张庆林(2006). 顿悟问题解决的原型事件激活: 自动还是控制. 心理科学, 29(5), 1123-1127.
[2] 陈爱玲, 刘玮, 李兴森(2015). 多方法协同提升顿悟能力的机制研究. 广东工业大学学报, 32(3), 18-22.
[3] 陈丽, 张庆林, 严霞, 张颖, 廖祥慧, 陈谊(2008). 汉语字谜原型激活中的情绪促进效应. 心理学报, 40(2), 127-135.
[4] 龚正霞(2011). 午睡剥夺对创造性问题解决中原型启发效应的影响. 硕士学位论文, 西南大学, 重庆.
[5] 罗劲(2004). 顿悟的大脑机制 3. 心理学报, 36(2), 219-234.
[6] 李文福, 龚正霞, 邱江, 张庆林(2015). 午睡剥夺对科学发明问题解决中的原型启发效应的影响. 心理发展与教育, 31(2), 165-170.
[7] 李亚丹, 马文娟, 罗俊龙, 张庆林(2012). 竞争与情绪对顿悟的原型启发效应的影响.心理学报, 44(1), 1-13.
[8] 邱江(2007). 顿悟问题解决中原型激活的认知神经机制. 博士学位论文, 西南大学, 重庆.
[9] 沈汪兵, 罗劲, 刘昌, 袁媛(2012). 顿悟脑的10年: 人类顿悟脑机制研究进展. 科学通报, 57(21), 1948-1963.
[10] 魏青青, 张友欣, 杨东, 张华, 张庆林(2015). 经营管理情境中创造性问题解决的原型启发效应. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 37(2), 1-6.
[11] 吴真真, 邱江, 张庆林(2008). 顿悟的原型启发效应机制探索. 心理发展与教育, 24(1), 31-35.
[12] 吴真真, 邱江, 张庆林(2009). 顿悟脑机制的实验范式探索. 心理科学, 32(1), 122-125.
[13] 吴真真(2010). 顿悟过程的原型启发机制. 博士论文, 西南大学, 重庆.
[14] 邢强, 黄伟东, 张庆林(2006). 顿悟研究述评及其展望. 广州大学学报: 社会科学版, 5(1), 47-51.
[15] 邢强, 张忠炉(2011). 外显内隐交互理论及对顿悟研究争论的解释. 心理学进展, 1(1), 19-26.
[16] 邢强, 张忠炉(2013a). 猜谜作业中的ERP效应: 基于催化范式的证据. 心理与行为研究, 11(1), 37-42.
[17] 邢强, 姚艳芬(2013b). 诱导对空间顿悟问题解决影响的眼动研究. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版), (2), 35-40.
[18] 张庆林, 邱江, 曹贵康(2005a). 顿悟认知机制的研究述评与理论构想. 心理科学, 27(6), 1435-1437.
[19] 张庆林, 邱江(2005b). 顿悟与源事件中启发信息的激活. 心理科学, 28(1), 6-9.
[20] 赵燕梅, 张庆林(2013). 顿悟中原型冗余信息对原型激活的干扰作用. 心理学探新, 33(4), 337-343.
[21] 赵艳晓(2014). 不同认知风格个体在顿悟问题解决中的原型位置效应. 硕士论文, 郑州大学, 郑州.
[22] Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). Methods for Investigating the Neural Components of Insight. Methods, 42, 87- 99.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.11.007
[23] Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J. et al. (2005). New Approaches to Demystifying Insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 322-328.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.012
[24] Chronicle, E. P., MacGregor, J. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2004). What Makes an Insight Problem? The Roles of Heuristics, Goal Conception, and Solution Recoding in Knowledge-Lean Problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 14-27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.14
[25] Hélie, S., & Sun, R. (2010). Incubation, Insight, and Creative Problem Solving: A Unified Theory and a Connectionist Model. Psychological Review, 117, 994-1024.
[26] Kaplan, C. A., & Simon, H. A. (1990). In Search of Insight. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 374-419.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90008-R
[27] Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint Relaxation and Chunk Decomposition in Insight Problem Solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1534-1555.
[28] Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 71-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154
[29] Luo, J. L., Li, W. F., Fink, A., Jia, L., Xiao, X., Qiu, J., & Zhang, Q. L. (2011). The Time Course of Breaking Mental Sets and Forming Novel Associations in Insight-Like Problem Solving: An ERP Investigation. Experimental Brain Research, 212, 583-591.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2761-5
[30] Mazzarello, P. (2000). What Dreams May Come? Nature, 408, 523.
[31] MacGregor, J. N., Ormerod, T. C., & Chronicle, E. P. (2001). Information Processing and Insight: A Process Model of Performance on the Nine-Dot and Related Problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 176.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.176
[32] Öllinger, M., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Psychological Research on Insight Problem Solving (pp. 275-300). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
[33] Ormerod, T. C., MacGregor, J. N., & Chronicle, E. P. (2002). Dynamics and Constraints in Insight Problem Solving. Journal of Experi-mental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 791-799.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.791
[34] Qiu, J., Li, H., Jou, J., Liu, J., Luo, Y. J., Feng, T. Y. et al. (2010). Neural Correlates of the “Aha” Experiences: Evidence from an fMRI Study of Insight Problem Solving. Cortex, 46, 397-403.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.006