猪肉嫩度测定方法对比分析
Comparative Study of Pork Tenderness Evaluation Method
DOI: 10.12677/HJFNS.2017.61004, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,674  浏览: 4,036  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 呼红梅, 成建国, 王彦平, 郭建凤, 朱荣生, 张 印, 王 诚, 王继英, 武英:山东省农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所,山东 济南;山东省畜禽疫病防治与繁育重点实验室,山东 济南;黄 洁:山东省农业科学院科技信息研究所,山东 济南
关键词: 猪肉嫩度剪切力值冷却肉方法改进Pork Tenderness Shear Value Cooled Meat Method Improvement
摘要: 【目的】改进肌肉嫩度测定方法,达到简单、快速、易于操作,以期适用工业化生产。【方法】以45头杜长大三元杂交猪(DLY)背最长肌为素材,利用嫩度仪和质构仪,研究屠宰后8 h、24 h、48 h、72 h 4个时间点、不同肌纤维走向的冷却肉嫩度,以及72 h熟肉嫩度,对比分析不同时间点、肌纤维走向和不同仪器测定的肌肉剪切力值,建立冷却肉与熟肉间的数学模型。【结果】宰后8~72 h不同肌纤维走向(垂直、斜向)的冷却肉剪切力值变化趋势一致,二者间极显著正相关(p < 0.01);宰后24 h冷却肉剪切力值与72 h熟肉剪切力值呈显著线性相关(p < 0.05);国产嫩度仪与质构仪测定的肌肉剪切力值极显著正相关,相关系数达0.688 (p < 0.01),而且二者间线性关系良好。【结论】生产中24 h排酸后可直接横切取背最长肌,钻取肉样进行剪切力值测定;屠后24 h冷却肉剪切力值可客观反映猪肉嫩度;国产嫩度仪可与质构仪互相替代,进行肌肉嫩度评定。
Abstract: Objective: This study was designed to improve the method of analyzing the meat tenderness in the pork industry, and then achieved a simpler, quicker and easier operation. Method: The meat tenderness from both sides’ longissimus dorsi of 45 DLY was measured with tenderometer (C-LM3, China) or texture analyzer (TA.XT Plus, Stable Micro System, UK). The tenderness of cooled meat of different muscle fiber trends and at 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h after slaughter and cooked meat of 72 h were studied to compare the muscle shear values evaluated by different instruments, time points and muscle fiber trends, and then build the mathematic model between cooled and cooked meat. Result: Cooled meat of 6 - 72 hs after slaughter, with different muscle fiber trends (vertical, diagonal), has the same shear values changing trend, and they are in a very significantly positive relation (p < 0.01); the shear value of cooled meat after 24 hours’ slaughter is in linear relation with cooked meat of 72 hs after slaughter (p < 0.05); muscle shear values evaluated by domestic tenderometer and texture analyzer are significantly related positively, of which the relevant index is 0.688 (p < 0.01). Moreover, they are in a fine linear relation with each other. Conclusion: During the process of delivery, the longissimus dorsi is selected by cross-cutting after mortification for 24 h; the shear value of cooled meat of 24 hs after slaughter could reflect the tenderness of pork; domestic tenderometer and texture analyzer could substitute with each other in the evaluation of muscle tenderness.
文章引用:呼红梅, 成建国, 王彦平, 郭建凤, 朱荣生, 张印, 王诚, 王继英, 黄洁, 武英. 猪肉嫩度测定方法对比分析[J]. 食品与营养科学, 2017, 6(1): 23-31. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJFNS.2017.61004

参考文献

[1] Warriss, P.D. (2001) Meat Science. 2nd Edition, CABI Publishing, Oxon, 108-113.
[2] Bredahl, L., Grunert, K.G. and Fertin, C. (1998) Relating Consumer Perceptions of Pork Quality to Physical Product Characteristics. Food Quality and Preference, 9, 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00007-X
[3] Platter, W.D., Tatum, J.D., Belk, K.E., Chapman, P.L., Scanga, J.A. and Smith, G.C. (2003) Relationships of Consumer Sensory Ratings, Marbling Score, and Shear Force Value to Consumer Acceptance of Beef Strip Loin Steaks. Journal of Animal Science, 81, 2741-2750. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81112741x
[4] Caine, W.R., Aalhus, J.L., Best, D.R., et al. (2003) Relationship of Texture Profile Analysis and Warner-Bratzler Shear Force with Sensory Characteristics of Beef Rib Steaks. Meat Science, 64, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00110-9
[5] Safari, E., Fogarty, N.M. and Ferrier, G.R. (2001) Diverse Lamb Genotypes. 3. Eating Quality and the Relationship between Its Objective Measurement and Sensory Assessment. Meat Science, 58, 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00087-5
[6] Otremba, M.M., Dikeman, M.E., Milliken, G.A., et al. (1999) Interrelationships among Evaluations of Beef Longissimus Semitendinosus Muscle Tenderness by Warner-Bratzler Shear Force, a Descriptive-Texture Profile Sensory Panel, and a Descriptive Attribute Sensory Panel. Journal of Animal Science, 77, 865-873.
[7] Hovenier, R., Kanis, E. and Verhoeven, J.A. (1993) Repeatability of Taste Panel Tenderness Scores and Their Relationships to Objective Pig Meat Quality Traits. Journal of Animal Science, 71, 2018-2025.
[8] Oeckel, M.J., Warnants, N. and Boucque, C.H.V. (1999) Pork Tenderness Estimation by Taste Panel, Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and On-Line Methods. Meat Science, 53, 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00067-4
[9] Peachey, B.M., Purchas, R.W. and Duizer, L.M. (2002) Relationships between Sensory and Objective Measures of Meat Tenderness of Beef M. Longissimus Thoracis from Bulls and Steers. Meat Science, 60, 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00123-1
[10] 刘万峰, 陈润生. 猪肉嫩度(剪切力值)测定前处理方法的研究[J]. 猪肉品质研究参考资料汇编, 1990(3): 6-24.
[11] 陈润生, 刘万峰. 国内外对肌肉嫩度测定前处理方法的研究概况, 猪肉品质研究参考资料汇编(第三册)[M]. 哈尔滨: 东北农学院, 1990: 1-5.
[12] Obuz, E., Dikeman, M.E. and Loughin, T.M. (2003) Effects of Cooking Method, Reheating, Holding Time, and Holding Temperature on Beef Longissimus Lumborum and Biceps Femoris Tenderness. Meat Science, 65, 841-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00289-9
[13] 周光宏. 肉品学[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999: 246-247.
[14] 刘兴余, 金邦荃, 詹巍, 汤祥明, 熊国远, 孙金艳. 猪肉嫩度测定方法的改进[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(1): 167- 172.
[15] 王林云. 现代中国养猪[M]. 北京市: 金盾出版社, 2009.
[16] 陈清明, 王连纯. 现在养猪生产[M]. 北京市: 中国农业大学出版社, 1999.
[17] NY/T 1180肉嫩度的测定剪切力测定法.
[18] De Huidobro, F.R., Miguel, E., BláZquez, B. and Onega, E. (2005) A Comparison between Two Methods (Warner-Bratzler and Texture Profile Analysis) for Testing Either Raw Meator Cooked Meat. Meat Science, 69, 527-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.09.008
[19] 呼红梅, 王彦平, 张印, 林松, 王诚, 武英. 猪肌肉嫩度测定方法的改进[J]. 养猪, 2014, 3: 61-64.
[20] 王钦德, 杨坚. 食品试验设计与统计分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003: 169-170.
[21] 张伟力. 猪肉质测定的采样与前处理[J]. 养猪, 2002(1): 30-31.
[22] Palka, K. (2003) The Influence of Post-Mortem Ageing and Roasting on the Microstructure, Texture and Collagen Solubility of Bovine Semitendinosus Muscle. Meat Science, 64, 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00179-1
[23] Savell, J.W., Mueller, S.L. and Baird, B.E. (2005) The Chilling of Carcasses. Meat Science, 70, 449-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.06.027
[24] Bourne, M.C. (1978) Texture Profile Analysis. Food Technology, 33, 62-66.