NST  >> Vol. 5 No. 2 (April 2017)

    Comparison and Analysis of AP1000 Nuclear Reactor Waste Treatment Technology in China

  • 全文下载: PDF(1792KB) HTML   XML   PP.94-102   DOI: 10.12677/NST.2017.52013  
  • 下载量: 714  浏览量: 1,874  


孔德生,李 斌,马若霞,耿忠林:中电投远达环保工程有限公司,重庆

核电SRTF工艺路线对比分析Nuclear Power SRTF Routing Comparative Analysis



Zhejiang Sanmen nuclear power plant and Shandong Haiyang nuclear power plant adopt the third-generation nuclear reactor named AP1000 which is developed by the United States. They are the first companies to use the combined process which combine with the nuclear waste disposal system and a site radwaste treatment facility (SRTF). However, the two plants have some differences in their SRTF processes. This paper contrasts and analyzes the processes of the two SRTF. It has played a positive role for making a comprehensive research on the treatment technologies of AP1000 reactor site radwaste and forming of standard and systematic treatment technologies and equipment. And it has a positive effect on realizing the safety management of the AP1000 reactor site radwaste and implementing the principle of waste minimization.

孔德生, 李斌, 马若霞, 耿忠林. 对我国AP1000核电离堆废物处理技术的对比分析[J]. 核科学与技术, 2017, 5(2): 94-102. https://doi.org/10.12677/NST.2017.52013


[1] 顾军. AP1000核电厂系统与设备[M]. 北京: 原子能出版社, 2010: 4.
[2] 林诚格. 非能动安全先进核电厂AP1000[M]. 北京: 原子能出版社, 2008: 8.
[3] 杨洋. 浅谈AP1000核电厂放射性废物处理[J]. 核电运行与维护, 2006 (3): 6.
[4] 陈斌. 核电厂低中放废树脂处理工艺[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2010, 30(1): 13-16.