产业二分网络拓扑结构演化的知识转移驱动机制研究
Research on the Driving Mechanism of Knowledge Transfer on the Topology Evolution of Industrial Bipartite Networks
DOI: 10.12677/MM.2018.86082, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 李守伟, 游宗君, 王作功:贵州财经大学贵阳大数据金融学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 知识转移网络结构协同演化计算实验Knowledge Transfer Network Topology Co-Evolution Computational Experiments
摘要: 随着技术创新复杂度的提高,越来越多的知识密集型服务嵌入到产业中。产业中的知识密集型服务机构群与创新企业群之间围绕技术创新活动形成了二分网络。基于服务机构与创新企业之间的知识距离,本文提出了产业二分网络上知识转移与网络结构的协同演化模型,并进行了计算实验分析。研究发现,适当的知识距离可以促进知识在服务机构和创新企业之间加速转移;网络知识存量随着知识扩散阈值的增大而增大,但链接粘性太高或太低都不利于网络知识存量的增加;网络知识增长速度在初始阶段快速增长,而后缓慢下降到稳定状态。产业二分网络的投影网络在演化过程中逐渐自组织形成小世界网络。研究结论对于加快知识扩散、提升技术创新能力有着重要的意义。
Abstract: More and more knowledge-intensive services are embedded in industry with the increasing com-plexity of technological innovation. The set of service institutes and enterprises form the bipartite network around the activities of technological innovation. Based on the knowledge distance be-tween service institute and enterprise, the co-evolution model of knowledge diffusion and industrial bipartite network is constructed, and then some computing experiments have made to analyze the evolutionary process of the model. Some conclusions are obtained from the analysis. The adequate knowledge distance can improve the knowledge diffusion between service institutes and enterprises. Average knowledge stock in network increases with the increasing diffusion threshold. However, too high or too low link stickiness has disadvantage to the increasing of knowledge stock. The increasing rate of knowledge is very fast in the beginning, and then slows down to stable status in the end. The industrial network forms a small world automatically during evolution. The conclusions are very important for increasing knowledge diffusion and promoting innovation capability.
文章引用:李守伟, 游宗君, 王作功. 产业二分网络拓扑结构演化的知识转移驱动机制研究[J]. 现代管理, 2018, 8(6): 644-653. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2018.86082

参考文献

[1] 魏江, 马克•鲍登.知识密集型服务业与创新[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.
[2] 李守伟, 陈永泰, 司春林, 彭本红. 基于KIBS的企业技术创新能力形成与演化[J]. 系统管理学报, 2011, 20(4): 421-427.
[3] Szulanski, G. (2000) The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Deci-sion Processes, 82, 9-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Argote, L. and Ingram, P. (2000) Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 150-169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 周文, 陈伟, 朗益夫. 集群创新网络知识动态增长研究: 基于过程视角[J]. 系统工程学报, 2015, 30(4): 431-441.
[6] Phelps, C., Heidl, R. and Wadhwa, A. (2012) Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 1115-1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Hansen, M. (1999) The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Reagans, R. and McEvily, B. (2003) Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240-267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 魏静, 等. 在线知识转移网络的复杂性扩散研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015, 27(7): 58-65.
[10] Yang, G., Hu, Z. and Liu, J. (2015) Knowledge Diffusion in the Collaboration Hyper Network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 419, 429-436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Tang, X., Yang, C.C. and Song, M. (2013) Understanding the Evolution of Multiple Scientific Research Domains Using a Content and Network Approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 1065-1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Ter Wal, A.L. (2014) The Dynamics of the Inventor Network in German Biotechnology: Geographic Proximity versus Triadic Closure. Journal of Economic Geography, 14, 589-620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Wang, S. and Groth, P. (2010) Measuring the Dynamic Bi-Directional Influence between Content and Social Networks. Proceedings of the Ninth International Semantic Web Conference, Shanghai. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Roth, C. and Contet, J. (2010) Social and Semantic Coevolu-tion in Knowledge Networks. Social Networks, 32, 16-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Iguez, G., Tague Martlnez, J., Kaski, K. and Barrio, R. (2012) Are Opinions Based on Science: Modelling Social Response to Scientific Facts. PLoS ONE, 7, 42122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Luo, S., Du, Y., Liu, P., Xuan, Z.G. and Wang, Y.Z. (2015) A Study on Co-Evolutionary Dynamics of Knowledge Diffusion and Social Network Structure. Expert Systems with Ap-plications, 42, 3619-3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Mowery, D., Oxley, J. and Silverman, B. (1998) Technological Overlap and Inter-Firm Cooperation: Implications for the Resource-Based View of the firm. Research Policy, 27, 507-523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef