网络研讨课中的师生权力关系研究——以研究生课堂为例
A Study on the Teacher-Student Power Relation in Webinar Classes—A Case Study of a Graduate Course
摘要: 研讨会是针对某一话题来进行研究、讨论、交流的会议。随着教育的不断改革发展，教师挣脱传统课堂的束缚，在课堂中采取研讨会的形式进行教学，给学生更多的讨论发言空间。互联网的快速发展以及新冠疫情的出现更是催生了网络研讨课。本研究基于Fairclough话语分析的三维框架，从词汇层面、语法层面和对话层面探讨了隐藏在网络研讨课中的师生权力关系。在此过程中，该研究以一节研究生网络研讨课的真实会话为语料，分析发现，网络研讨会课堂依旧以教师为主导，教师依旧享有较高的权力地位。这种不平等的权力关系与我国的历史文化因素、社会因素和现实因素密不可分。
Abstract: Seminar is a kind of meeting for research, discussion, and communication on a particular topic. With the continuous reform and development of education, teachers change the traditional way of teaching, adopt webinar class as a form of teaching and try to give students more opportunities to share their thoughts. Besides, the rapid growth of the Internet and the outbreak of COVID-19 have given rise to webinar. Based on Fairclough’s three-dimensional analysis framework, this study attempts to explore the power relationship between teacher and students in webinar class from the aspects of words, grammar and conversations. In this study, the discourse of a graduate webinar class is analyzed. The result shows that the class is still dominated by teacher who has much more power. This kind of power relationship is closely related with the cultural factors, social factors and realistic factors of our country.
文章引用：刘心语, 宗明霞. 网络研讨课中的师生权力关系研究——以研究生课堂为例[J]. 现代语言学, 2021, 9(5): 1315-1322. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2021.95179

参考文献

[1] Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. Longman Group UK Ltd., London.
[2] Esmat, B. (2017) The Question of Power in Language Classes from a Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective—Once a Student, Always a Student? Pragmatics and Society, 8, 542-570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 顾宇萍. 基于批评话语分析视角的初中英语教师课堂反馈语研究[J]. 基础外语教育, 2018, 20(6): 10-18+108.
[4] 国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年) [J]. 中国民族教育, 2010(Z1): 7-21.
[5] 刘永兵, 王冰, 林正军. 英语课堂教学量化研究工具的构想与设计[J]. 中国外语, 2009(3): 61-67+72.
[6] Hall, J.K. and Walsh, M. (2002) Teacher-Student Interaction and Language Learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 186-203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] 闫涛, 张丽云. 基于语料库的高校英语教师课堂元话语多维功能机制研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2013(2): 59-64+127-128.
[8] 郭红伟. 中国高校英语教师课堂元话语三维功能研究[J]. 中国外语, 2014(2): 60-67.
[9] 郭红伟, 卢加伟. 教师课堂元话语多维功能对比研究[J]. 现代外语, 2020, 43(2): 248-259.
[10] 何安平. 基于语料库的英语教师话语分析[J]. 现代外语, 2003(4): 161-170.
[11] 肖肃. 关联理论与课堂教师话语[J]. 西安外国语学院学报, 2003(3): 45-48.
[12] 寮菲, 冯晓媛. 英语课堂话语的认知语境与交际效果分析[J]. 外语教学, 2005(1): 1-6.
[13] Foulcault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. Routledge, London.
[14] Lukes, S. (1978) Power: A Radical View. The Macmillan Press Ltd., Hong Kong, 34.
[15] Fairclough, N. (2001) Language and Power. 2nd Edition, Longman, Harlow.
[16] Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation. Blackwell, Oxford, 49.
[17] Paltridge, B. (2000) Making Sense of Discourse Analysis. Antipodean Educational Enterprises, Cammeray.
[18] Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: Papers in the Critical Study of Language. Longman, New York.
[19] van Dijk, T.A. (1999) Critical Discourse Analysis. http://ca.search.yahoo.com/search
[20] Atkinson, J.M.A. and Heritage, J. (1999) Transcript Notation-Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Taylor & Francis, London. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Halliday, M.A.K and Hasan, R. (1985) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford University Press, London.
[22] Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold Ltd., London.
[23] Long, M. and Sato, C. (1983) Methodological Issues in Interlanguage Studies: An Interactionist Perspective. In: Davies, A., Criper, C. and Howatt, A., Eds., Interlanguage, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 253-279.